위키미디어 재단 선거/2024년/후보자/레인 라즈베리
Lane Rasberry (bluerasberry)
bluerasberry (talk • meta edits • global user summary • CA • AE)
요약 정보 |
| |
---|---|---|
전체 신청서(필수 + 선택 질문)의 총 단어 수는 1000 단어입니다. | ||
필수 질문 | ||
위키미디어 재단 이사회에 출마하는 이유가 무엇인가요? 당신은 무엇에 기여하시겠습니까? 무엇에 대해 더 배우고 싶나요? | 커뮤니티에 대한 투자는 우리 목표를 달성하는 가장 좋은 방법이며 저는 커뮤니티 권한 부여를 통해 위키미디어 재단 사명을 발전시키는 예산을 개발하기 위해 이사회에 합류하고 싶습니다. 위키미디어 재단은 2017년부터 10억 달러를 모금했지만 연간 예산의 10%만이 보조금입니다. 이 금액은 충분한 리더십과 커뮤니티 거버넌스를 개발하기에는 너무 낮습니다.
위키미디어 서밋 2024에서 위키미디어 운동 가맹단체는 새로운 운동 헌장과 글로벌 협의회가 위키미디어 재단에서 사용자 커뮤니티로 권력을 이전하기로 결정했습니다. 이러한 권력 이양은 강력한 옹호 없이는 이루어지지 않을 수도 있지만, 저는 커뮤니티가 성공하는 데 필요한 자원을 협상할 것입니다. 여기에는 현재의 커뮤니티 프로그램을 유지하고 스페인어권 세계, 인도 및 아프리카 국가에 대한 기금을 늘리는 것이 포함됩니다. 현재 위키 조직의 구성원만이 일부 거버넌스 권한에 접근할 수 있기 때문에 그러한 멤버십이 없는 99%의 편집자와 독자를 위한 거버넌스 참여 옵션도 만들어야 합니다. 저는 위키미디어 전문 역할인 "상주 위키미디어인"로서 12년의 경험을 갖고 있습니다. 저는 버지니아 대학의 데이터 과학 학교에 재학 중이며 제가 소속된 기관에서는 법률, 회계, 윤리 및 기타 전문가 학문적 지원을 통해 이사회 업무를 지원할 준비가 되어 있습니다. | |
귀하의 위키미디어 경험(예: 위키미디어 프로젝트에 대한 기여, 위키미디어 조직이나 가맹단체 회원 자격, 위키미디어 운동 조직자로서의 활동, 위키미디어 운동 동맹 조직 참여 등)을 설명해 주세요. | *2012년부터 전문 위키미디어인으로 활동해 12년 동안 매주 40시간의 위키 활동을 펼쳤습니다.
| |
귀하의 관점에서 볼 때, 위키미디어 재단은 향후 5~10년 동안 무엇을 우선순위로 두어야 하며, 이를 가장 중요한 우선순위로 보는 이유는 무엇입니까? | 우리의 독특한 강점은 크라우드 소싱 분산형 거버넌스이며 우리는 그 성장을 후원해야 합니다.
| |
Optional questions - Professional Experience, Skills and Education | ||
Please describe your experience with governing bodies of organizations (nonprofit or for-profit), mentioning the scope of your responsibilities, as well as the complexity of the organization (in terms of scale of operations, budget, number of people involved, or other meaningful measures) and the size of the board or body. | Since I joined the School of Data Science at the University of Virginia, it has grown from 10 to 200 people, with annual budget of $24 million/year. In this startup environment we make all strategic decisions collaboratively, and my own contribution is emphasizing open science.
I have designed budgets and annual reports for Wikimedia New York City, Wikimedia Medicine, and Wikimedia LGBT+, so I understand Wikimedia community governance. Since 2007 I have been on an ethics board reviewing ethics for multinational HIV vaccine clinical trials. Lessons from medical research can inform Wikimedia challenges. The United States government funds this from a US$3 billion budget. I founded an LGBT community center (Q2945640) which hosts concerts. This includes posting artist profiles in Wikidata and Wikimedia Commons to showcase regional culture. Our events have helped 100 people in 커밍아웃 (Q208099) as LGBT+. | |
Please describe your professional career experience. | I am a data scientist and principal investigator in multiple research projects.
After university I conducted medical 임상 연구 (Q5133849), which I still do indirectly in ethics and data curation. From 2012-18 I was Wikimedian at Consumer Reports, which is a nonprofit 소비자보호 (Q664183) organization sharing product safety information in Wikipedia. Since 2018 as a data scientist at my university I do projects to promote 오픈 사이언스 (Q309823) and 공공 데이터 (Q309901). Partner organizations like these invest money in the Wikimedia platform, and we should seek more. | |
Please briefly describe 3 situations that show how you tackled, or advised others on, a complex problem in an organization. How did you work with others to address the situations? | .
| |
Please describe your educational background, including degrees, certificates, and courses of study finished, and their relevance to board work. | My bachelor of science in chemistry led me to medical research, then to ethics, diversity, and openness, and then to Wikimedia medical content. | |
Please add any relevant links describing your professional background, experience, profile (such as LinkedIn, staff page, etc.). | . | |
Optional questions - Leadership Experience | ||
Please describe ways in which you have helped to form a bridge between multiple communities (such as by working on projects outside your home wiki, or working on a collaboration between multiple affiliates). | I edit medical content. During COVID my outreach recruited translators for articles.
On-wiki, I support Wikimedians in applying for Wikimedia grants. My own experience and the gaps in our funding reports have convinced me that many Wikimedians are unable to access money. I feel that financial transparency would increase trust in the Wikimedia grants strategy. As is common among LGBT+ wiki editors, I get harassed. Because my town Charlottesville had a Nazi rally in 2017 and because I live in the United States where shootings are routine, I support increased discussion of disaster response. Development of protection resources for LGBT+ people, women, neurodivergent people, and other vulnerable groups will make Wikimedia safer for everyone. | |
Can you describe a policy, on wiki or off, that you helped to create or change? What did you learn from this experience? | At my university, I developed my school's open access policy . I learned why people either support or fear openness.
I organized community protests in the controversies over Superprotect, the removal of WMF CEO Lila Tretikov, the rebranding, Can San Fran Ban Fram?, fundraising messages, and others. These are major wiki demonstrations with many petitioners. While protests are helpful, it would better if they were not necessary. I wish to reconcile conflicts with financial transparency and consensus-building. | |
How have you been able to empower people to make their voices heard? | I empower people to be heard by joining and bringing media to protests, as I just described. | |
Sometimes in professional situations, there are personality conflicts. Explain how you remain productive even with personality conflicts. | I remain productive by addressing conflicts with de-escalation (Q1182511) techniques. Many organizations already have developed ways to address conflicts, and I want to bring these practices to Wikimedia. For example, feminist scholar Sara Ahmed (Q15437208) describes how society systematically dismisses women's complaints, and teaches how to avoid this. | |
Optional questions - Strategic Thinking | ||
Where do you see the need for greater diversity in the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees or within the movement? What steps would you take to improve diversity on the Board or within the movement? What steps would you recommend the Board take to improve diversity? | The need for greater diversity is in the Wikimedia Foundation budget. Although our volunteer recognition programs are diverse, our investments are not. More transparency about Wikimedia Foundation budgets and the Wikimedia Endowment would inspire global confidence in our programs. | |
확인 | 위키미디어 재단 직원이 수행한 신원 확인과 선거 위원회가 수행한 자격 확인 | |
적임: 확인됨 입증된: KTC (talk) 20:03, 3 June 2024 (UTC) |
신분, 신분증: 확인됨 입증된: – NahidSultan (WMF) (talk) 08:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC) |