User talk:Syum90/Archives/2016-01

Active discussions

Closing a request

Hi! Can you please close this request? Thank you. --Ochilov (talk) 06:14, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --Ochilov (talk) 08:12, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
You're welcome! Syum90 (talk) 08:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

request

I have done many edits here on meta and I think my edits should not be checked by Patrollers so can I get Autopatrol right here.-BRP ever 08:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

@BRPever: hi, although your contribs are good, almost all of them are translations; I would like to see you participating on other processes here on Meta before granting this permission. Best regards.--Syum90 (talk) 09:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
allright.--BRP ever 09:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Block request

Discussion continues at Requests for comment/Block request for BAICAN XXX at ro.wikinews.--Syum90 (talk) 08:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. I noticed you had some admin activity at ro.wikinews and that you're still active. At ro.wikinews we have a user that is causing us serious troubles. There are indeed 2 admins, but one of them (Ionutzmovie) retired (at least temporary) from ro.wikipedia and hasn't been active on ro.wikinews since 8.10.2015. The other one (MSClaudiu, also a bureaucrat) hasn't been active since 17.06.2015. I tried to contact him, but haven't received any reply. Therefore, since none of them is active, I decided to ask you to end this situation:

BAICAN XXX (see link), well-known user indefinitely blocked on ro.wikipedia and several other Romanian language projects and it.wikivoyage (for one year due to personal attacks) with many clones used along the time (see here, Clone cunoscute ale lui BAICAN XXX - Known clones of user BAICAN XXX), has already been blocked and warned several times on ro.wikinews (see here). Still, he continue in the very same manner that led to his account being blocked. His destructive edits include, but are not limited to: copyright violations, personal attacks, refusal to accept consensus (such as the one regarding the articles to be verified before being published, in almost the same manner as en.wikinews), deletion of the delete templates, creation of pages unrelated to ro.wikinews that contain personal beliefs and/or criticisms regarding other projects. After another set of warnings, including a final warning and only warning, and two other messages regarding personal attacks and acceptance of the consensus (both without any feedback), he (again) continues to act the same way. Therefore, time has come to put an end. Just for the record, his last block was for one month (see here).

Thank you for the time spent in reading this long message above. Hope you will consider in helping us out. Regards, Wintereu 16:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

If you need anything, like diffs or any sort of translations regarding the situation described, please let me know. Thanks again. --Wintereu 16:31, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
@Wintereu: Mentioned diffs and comments by other local users would be helpful.--Syum90 (talk) 09:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Warnings and notifications given to BAICAN XXX since last block

Below you will find a list of the warnings, notifications and other relevant messages given to BAICAN XXX since November 2015:

  1. Level 1 warning — given on 7.11.2015 for this edit on other user's comment. Împotrivă means against, although the comment made by user XXN was a simple question and nothing else.
  2. Notification given on 17.11.2015 regarding lack of sources for the articles created by this user.
  3. A second notification given on 22.11.2015 regarding lack of sources for another article this user created.
  4. Level 2 warning given on 2.12.2015 regarding the abusive deletion of the delete templates from several pages (see [1], [2], [3]).
  5. Notification given on 5.12.2015 regarding insults made to another user, using an IP address (see confirmation here).
  6. Level 3 warning given on 10.12.2015 for copyright violations regarding two articles created by the user.
  7. Level 4 warning (final warning) given on 28.12.2015 for abusive deletion of the delete templates within the following articles:
    • this article — proposed for deletion because it's not related to Wikinews and it's full of criticisms and insults against an administrator from ro.wikibooks.
    • this article — proposed for deletion because it's not a news (ro.wikinews has the very same criteria as en.wikinews).
    • this article — proposed for deletion due lack of neutral point of view and journalistic writing language.
  8. Level 4 warning (final warning similar to only warning) given on 2.01.2016 for:
    • another deletion of the delete template here
    • partial deletion of a previous warning given to him (see here) and again 23 minutes later (see here)
    • another deletion of the delete template here
    • deletion of the delete template here (deletion proposed for lack of neutral point of view and journalistic language style)
    • deletion of the delete template here (deletion proposed for lack of journalistic language style; article written almost entirely using quotes)
  9. Message in which I told this user about an article that he created using 3 different news from 3 different periods of time (imagine that). I also made a final request to stop adding the publicare template (the equivalent of publish template) before an article gets verified (according to consensus and criteria from our local tea house, which are the same as the ones from en.wikinews used to verify an article). I can give you lots of examples with this user adding the template before the articles get verified.
  10. Notification regarding other insults made by this user reffering to another user as a venetic patriot from the north (venetic is used in a pejorative way to describe a person who lives in a foreign country and considered as a foreigner in the place he/she established). The notification was given on 7.01.2016.

--Wintereu 00:48, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

It is also relevant the following fact. For any of the warnings and other messages above there was no feedback, nothing. There is not even a single attempt this user has made to collaborate with others, nor to learn from his mistakes. --Wintereu 00:58, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Defense

Hellou, Syum90! I regret that we can not, we are not able to resolve the dispute themselves on what is published and what is not published on ro.Wikinews. I hope to succeed at all to understand the exact situation at ro.Wikinews, Wikinews.

I write this in early 2015 after being blocked from other projects ro.Wiki. In 2015 I wrote about 70 news/articles to Wikinews, most in relation to other users, contributors, following news editor of me writing about about 12 news/articles, and 3rd place ... not much is none. And what me, in context, I find it very significant, one who reported me to you and ask you firmly blocking my user:Wintereu has not written/created any articles on Wikinews, he making only comments usually negative and obstructionist regarding articles written by me. I certify written here by next statistical table, undone me:

Thus, you may speak of that ro.Wikinews lived and worked - informing people in 2015, mostly through news redacted by me user:BAICAN XXX. But this does not matter, it seems, for a group of interest in user information belongs: Wintereu not want freedom of news, but news like censorship after their own interests. So my articles-news that unwanted group relatatat topics being published, the news came and stepped on red! I suppose, because I have reliable information about it that those two administrators from ro.Wikiştiri - Ionuţmovie and MS Claudiu did not want to work with Wintereu interest-group and the two ran away, and disappeared as administrators unactiving actually to Wikinews. It is somewhat comical and incomprehensible what would happen here by ro.Wikiştiri, if user:Wintereu blocked his BAICAN XXX, and so I will not be able to edit news !? Perhaps this - no longer news ro.Wikiştiri public - wants this user:Wintereu, which has not yet drawn any news! I do not go, however, inactivity, I have enough to do on other Wikimedia projects in English, German, Polish and why not in Wiktionario in Spanish!

The two (user Wintereu and Robbie SWE) who will unconditionally as I, BAICAN XXX, to be blocked, are users who do not write and have written/redacted no news at ro.Wikiştiri. I suppose the fact that they both work, more or less, for any intelligence service concerned may in censorship. Robbie SWE, which is admin at ro.Wikţionar, locked myself there because I wanted to introduce to Wicţionar a lot of categories (Domain, Grammar, etc.) that do not exist and that he wants them as are, for example fr.Wikţionar or en.Wikţionar. He simply mind in saying that I had other conflicts in Wiktionary, I worked well with foreign Wicţionars, including FR, DE, ES, PL, and EN.Wiktionary. E.g. by en.Wikţionar to me, actually, I kinda 7,000 contributions ... so it puts a rhetorical question, if my contributions there were not quality it would have allowed the British to do/write to her 7,000 contributions?

BAICAN XXX (talk) 20:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


And there is something related to en.Wikţionar, I contradicted myself there during a principle discussion Robbie SWE, severel years ago, I advocated the introduction of clear texts written in Romanian traditional Romanian diacritical characters ș,ț,Ș,Ț, while he, Robbie SWE, argued against keeping me s and t with cedilla character. But I was right with Romanian diacritics, they were then placed on all Wiki. So it could be and revenge from him, and this is possible! BAICAN XXX (talk) 21:00, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Syum90, please proceed as you think is best and right for fair news readers, news editors and Wikimedia projects! Goodbye!

  • in Romanian

Hellou, Syum90! Eu regret că noi nu putem, nu suntem în stare să rezolvăm singuri disputa privind ce este publicabil și ce nu este publicabil la ro.Wikinews. Eu sper să reușești cât de cât să înțelegi exact situația de la ro.Wikinews, Wikiștiri.

Eu scriu aici de la începutul lui 2015, după ce am fost blocat la alte proiecte ro.Wiki. În anul 2015 am scris cam 70 de știri/articole la Wikiștiri, cele mai multe în raport cu ceilalți utilizatori-contribuitori, următorul redactor de știri de după mine scriind cam vreo 12 știri/articole, iar pe locul 3... nu prea mai este nimeni. Și ceea ce mie, în context, mi se pare foarte semnificativ, cel care m-a reclamat la tine și îți cere ție ferm blocarea mea, user:Wintereu, nu a scris/creat nici un articol la Wikiștiri, el făcând doar comentarii, de regulă negative și obstrucționiste privitor la articolele scrise de mine. Certific cele scrise aici prin tabelul statistic următor, nefăcut de mine: *http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikinews/RO/TablesWikipediaRO.htm#wikipedians

Astfel, s-ar putea vorbi de faptul că, ro.Wikinews a trăit și activat - informând oamenii în anul 2015, mai ales prin articolele create de mine, user:BAICAN XXX. Dar acest lucru nu contează, se pare, pentru un grup de interese în domeniul informațiilor de care aparține user:Wintereu care nu vrea libertate de știri, ci vrea cenzurarea știrilor după propriile interese. Și deci articolele-știri ale mele care au relatatat despre subiecte nedorite de grup a fi publicate, aceste știri au intrat sau călcat pe roșu! Eu presupun, căci nu am informații sigure despre asta, că cei 2 administratori de la ro.Wikiștiri - Ionuțmovie și MS Claudiu nu au vrut să colaboreze cu grupul-Wintereu de interese și cei doi au dat bir cu fugiții, nemaiactivând ca administratori și dispărând de fapt de la Wikiștiri. Este oarecum comic și de neînțeles ce se va întâmpla aici la ro.Wikiștiri dacă acest user:Wintereu cere blocarea lui BAICAN XXX, și deci eu nu voi mai putea redacta știri!? Poate tocmai asta, - să nu se mai publice știri la ro.Wikiștiri -, vrea acest user:Wintereu, care nu a redactat până acum nici o știre! Eu nu duc, oricum, lipsă de activitate, am destule de făcut pe alte proiecte Wikimedia în engleză, germană, polonă și de ce nu și la Wiktionario, în spaniolă!

Pe tine, Syum90, te rog să procedezi cum crezi că este mai bine și corect pentru cititorii de știri corecte, redactorii de știri și pentru proiectele Wikimedia! S-auzim de bine! BAICAN XXX (discuție) 11 ianuarie 2016 16:13 (UTC)BAICAN XXX (talk) 16:29, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Contra-argument la admin-candidatul Voloh28, că ce declară el aici despre BAICAN XXX este neadecvat și neautorizat:
  • În lipsa unei analize decente a argumentelor și cât de cât profesională, trebuie să mă plasez în tabăra contra până la capăt. Iată încă o intervenție a candidatului cu valoare de argument. Adică, pe lângă o listă întreagă de lacune, candidatul dă garanții, în loc să argumenteze. Adevărul este că argumentul solicită efort intelectual.
Eu propun să fim serioși! Pe bune, dacă nu dorim să ne batem joc și de acest proiect și să găsim un candidat decent dacă chiar e musai.--Silenzio76 (discuție) 12 ianuarie 2016 17:57 (UTC) BAICAN XXX (talk) 19:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Regarding the message above:
  • I actually wrote (in my limited spare time) an article (see here) that respects every single policy and guideline (which are the same as on en.wikinews) with no exceptions. The user BAICAN XXX lied saying I haven't written any article.
  • The quality of the most pages created by him vary from poor to worse. See my previous comment on this page.
  • "... I have reliable information about it that those two administrators from ro.Wikiştiri - Ionuţmovie and MS Claudiu did not want to work with Wintereu interest-group and the two ran away, and disappeared as administrators unactiving actually to Wikinews." — That's a blatant lie. There wasn't any communication between me and MSClaudiu, except for a recent e-mail I sent him, regarding his long-term absence from ro.wikinews. Also, the only time I spoke with Ionutzmovie about BAICAN XXX was on 19.09.2015, as you can see here. --Wintereu 02:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

I activate on Romanian Wikipedia and Romanian Wikinews. I confirm that BAICANXXX makes problems on ro.Wikinews and should be blocked.--VolohD 03:48, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Discussion continues at Requests for comment/Block request for BAICAN XXX at ro.wikinews.--Syum90 (talk) 08:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

@Infinite0694:   Done--Syum90 (talk) 10:22, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Requesting revdel

This edit is spam. Since you deleted some other spam from the main page's talk, I thought you would like to remove it. Thanks. 96.237.19.20 22:15, 10 January 2016 (UTC) wait, not spam: but promotion.

This edit has been removed and that's enough for me since it is not blatant spam in my opinion and there are no spam links on the edit summary. Anyway thanks for report it. Regards.--Syum90 (talk) 09:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletions

speedy deletions no useful content thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 188.113.197.160 (talk) 12:21 21 January 2016 (UTC)‎

It is a redirect, why is not useful in your opinion? Syum90 (talk) 12:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
no broken redirect the arabic language delete! (188.113.200.204 20:16, 21 January 2016 (UTC))
I'm sorry but I don't understand you, I don't see any reason to delete this redirect. Regards.--Syum90 (talk) 08:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

:-)

Me alegra mucho ver tu candidatura. Te deseo la mejor de las suertes. Un abrazo, —MarcoAurelio 11:42, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

@MarcoAurelio: Muchas gracias Marco, un honor viniendo de ti. Aprovecho para agradecerte tu enorme apoyo y confianza desde el principio, espero estar a la altura en caso de ser finalmente elegido. Un abrazo.--Syum90 (talk) 11:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Lo siento. La verdad es que llevaba tiempo sin ver elecciones tan difíciles. No te desanimes, sigo pensando que eras un buen candidato. Un abrazo. —MarcoAurelio 14:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio: Muchas gracias Marco, no te preocupes por mí, por mi parte estoy muy agusto como GS. Un abrazo.--Syum90 (talk) 14:49, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Future IdeaLab Campaigns results

Last December, I invited you to help determine future ideaLab campaigns by submitting and voting on different possible topics. I'm happy to announce the results of your participation, and encourage you to review them and our next steps for implementing those campaigns this year. Thank you to everyone who volunteered time to participate and submit ideas.

With great thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation. 23:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

No sé...

Hola. No sé si es que la lista negra de títulos no funciona o es que el filtro y la lista funcionan al mismo nivel, porque sino no entiendo por qué, a pesar de haber bloqueado el patrón que utilizan, el filtro sigue bloqueando IPs como si hubiesen conseguido editar :-S. Supongo que nos tocará ser pacientes y esperar a que se cansen. —MarcoAurelio 11:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

@MarcoAurelio: En efecto, creo que es por esto mismo que tú indicas, por lo que yo sé funcionan al mismo nivel. A mí me parece bien que reciban doble ración, bloqueo del filtro e imposibilidad de crear el título por parte de la lista negra :-) Syum90 (talk) 11:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio: sólo comentarte que he podido verificar sin lugar a dudas que la lista negra funciona perfectamente. Un saludo.--Syum90 (talk) 10:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Gracias. Me hubiese gustado poder acceder al registro de la lista negra para ver cuánto impacto tiene y si siguen fastidiando, pero son registros que se guardan en la base de datos con muchos datos en bruto y hace falta firmar un NDA adicional para ello. Intentaré insistir a ver si me pudiesen dar una muestra o al menos una estadística. Saludos, —MarcoAurelio 10:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio: lo he verificado tratando de recrear algunos títulos que he añadido recientemente a la lista, por supuesto en no-GS-wikis, el sistema no me ha dejado.--Syum90 (talk) 11:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Dichosa curiosidad. Que Special:Log/spamblacklist estaba disponible, asumo que ya sabiáis, pero yo al menos no me había fijado que (aunque que yo sepa no logea nada), en el dropdown aparece también Special:Log/titleblacklist. Será alguna seña...? Savhñ 11:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@Savh and MarcoAurelio: efectivamente no registra nada, pero creo que la mejor manera de comprobar si la lista funciona es tratando de crear alguno de los títulos de la lista; en este sentido cuando trato de crear por ejemplo w:kk:Жавад Рамезани, título de nuestro viejo conocido JR que he añadido recientemente, el sistema no me permite crear la página y me dice:

Advertencia: solo los administradores y los usuarios con el permiso tboverride pueden editar esta página porque esta aparece en la siguiente entrada de la lista negra de títulos: .*[ҶЏЖ]ав[оа]д\s{0,5}\w{0,5}\s{0,5}Рам[ае]з[оа]н.*

Lo cual creo deja claro que la lista funciona, al menos hoy.--Syum90 (talk) 11:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@Savh: Conozco dicho registro, pero se encuentra desactivado por razones de protección de datos, en tanto que podría llegar a registrar direcciones IP de usuarios tratando de crear cuentas, etc. Ver T68450. Un saludo. —MarcoAurelio 14:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Sara Mednick

Hola, soy un usuario activo de Wikipedia y me he sorprendido al ver que inmediatamente después de publicar un nuevo artículo (que era una prueba que iba a continuar modificando) usted me lo ha borrado. No entiendo el motivo y me gustaría recibir una respuesta.

Gracias —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Icfez99 (talk) 08:57 2 feb 2016‎ (UTC)

@Icfez99: Hola, ya te he contestado en tu página de discusión. Debo informarte por si no te has dado cuenta de que esta wiki no es en absoluto una Wikipedia, tienes más información en castellano en Meta:About. Saludos.--Syum90 (talk) 09:06, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

ブロックを解いてください

最高権限行使

荒らし行為は止めてブロックを解除されたい。Commos4.0

Commns4.0 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ナカネコ (talk) 10:30 2 feb 2016‎ (UTC)

@ナカネコ: You're blocked on MediaWiki.org so please request the unblock at your talk page there. Regards.--Syum90 (talk) 11:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion thanks. (195.189.123.203 17:04, 2 February 2016 (UTC))

  Done, thanks.--Syum90 (talk) 17:13, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

for deleting a fake article on IGBO Wikipedia today. There is another one: ig:Obodo Nordik‎. It is an advertizing text for a german locksmiths office (Schlüsseldienst). You can check it by runnig it throug a translating unit or by following the given link there in the article. The article has no igbo text in its history, means it was not vandalized. Thank you! --Tschips (talk) 19:58, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

  Deleted, thanks for report it.--Syum90 (talk) 08:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you again for immediate action :-) --Tschips (talk) 17:08, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism

deleted is Wikipedia:Maqala baslawshılar ushın qısqa qollanba vandalism. (195.189.123.203 17:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC))
  Done by me. Thanks,-Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Article about movie downloading

Hi, could you please have a look on this article at Igbo Wikipedia, it is written in english and I do not know, what to do with it... Thank you already. --Tschips (talk) 22:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

hola amigo, estuve confundido, solo es pagina de discusion. lo arreglaré yo. --Tschips (talk) 14:43, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
That page and another one created by the same user were spam, I've deleted them.--Syum90 (talk) 08:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Super, thanks for solving the problem this way. --Tschips (talk) 14:40, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Not close

Blocked you forever!Commns4.0 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ナカネコ (talk) 21:42 4 feb 2016‎ (UTC)

You were blocked by Shirayuki due to vandalism. If you want to be unblocked on MediaWiki.org please make a request at your talk page there.--Syum90 (talk) 08:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Actores

Hola amigo, tengo problema con unos articulos sobre actores femeninos en Wikipedia Igbo. Podria hablarte con esto? Saludos, --Tschips (talk) 19:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

@Tschips: Hola, te ayudaré en lo que pueda pero debes tener en cuenta que no entiendo el idioma. Un saludo.--Syum90 (talk) 09:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Sí claro, y antemano gracias por tu ayuda. El problema es muy simple. Hay varias pagina de actrices con links a paginas raras, como ig:Misty Stone (links por adultos) y me pregunto, si debo corregirlas. --Tschips (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
@Tschips: No parece haber problema con esos links, además como puedes ver también aparecen en las versiones en otras lenguas como en inglés o en castellano.--Syum90 (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Super! Gracias! Estuve inseguro, ahora todo claro. Saludos --Tschips (talk) 14:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Eligibility

Please don't manually add eligibility tags to the voting pages, this is already done by a bot. Thanks, --Vogone (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

@Vogone: Ok, thanks.--Syum90 (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
In case you want to help: Template:Stewards/Elections 2016/Voters/Check. The bot will then update the voting pages accordingly. Kind regards, --Vogone (talk) 18:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Kategorias

Hola, tengo pregunta sobre kategorias en igbo wikipedia. La kategoria :ig:Òtù:Oshimiri es parte de la mas alta kategoria :ig:Òtù:Úwà que significa "el mundo" (seres humanos, animales). En mi opinion debería ser parte de :ig:Òtù:Geography. Puedo cambiar el objetivo de la de Oshimiri sin hacer vandalismo? Gracias y saludos, --Tschips (talk) 12:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

@Tschips: hola de nuevo, no me has dicho que significa Oshimiri así que no sé qué decirte; en cualquier caso no sería vandalismo, ya que éste consiste en hacer las cosas mal a sabiendas, que no es el caso.--Syum90 (talk) 12:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Hola y lo siento: "Oshimiri" significa océanos. Se puede ver si mires el contenido de su kategoría :ig:Òtù:Oshimiri. En la kategoría :ig:Òtù:Geography ya existe la sub-kategoría "Continentes". Sorry, no me expresé muy claro, solo quería saber si es posible cambiar el objetivo de una kategoría baja sind hacer un lío... :-)
Saludos, --Tschips (talk) 20:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
@Tschips: lo que te recomiendo es que te fijes en cómo están organizadas otras wikipedias, por ejemplo: w:es:Categoría:Océanos, w:en:Category:Oceans o w:de:Kategorie:Ozean: Un saludo.--Syum90 (talk) 07:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Buena propuesta, voy a mirarlas. Gracias por tu ayuda en discutirlo. Saludos --Tschips (talk) 13:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Resuelto, gracias. --Tschips (talk) 19:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

De nada :-) aquí estoy para lo que necesites.--Syum90 (talk) 20:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Kategoría para borrar

Hola amigo, esta Kategoría debería ser borrado. Hay otra en lengua Igbo con unas paginas, qual ya conecté con su objetivo "continente". Gracias :-) --Tschips (talk) 23:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

  Borrada--Syum90 (talk) 07:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Removal of the Article about Raymond Amumpaire by 41.210.154.127 09:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

man how could you go ahead and delete my article please return it back. thanks 41.210.154.127 09:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, what wiki?--Syum90 (talk) 09:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Бюллетень «Википедии на языках России», выпуск #3 (февр.'16) / «Wikipedias in the languages of Russia» newsletter, issue #3 (Feb.'16)

Уважаемый коллега,

Большое спасибо всем и каждому, кто вносит свой вклад в развитие   Разделов Википедии на языках России. В этом выпуске:

  1. На сайте ВМРУ заработал механизм перевода страниц PageTranslation и настроено автоматическое определение предпочитаемого пользователем языка отображения контента. Служебная:Регистрация переводчиков
  2. В нашем братстве ожидается пополнение: одобрен перевод тестового раздела на адыгейском языке в общее пространство.
  3. Самых вежливых и полезных участников проекта "сосчитает" 'Thanks report'.
  4. В Башкирской Википедии заработал машинный переводчик
  5. Опубликован список наиболее редактируемых статей РуВики за 2015 г.
  6. Статистика: первая полная за месяц на базе WikiStats и помесячная посещаемость за год (заглавные страницы, stats.grok.se)
  7. Подготовка образовательных видео по работе в Википедии и родственных проектах (с субтитрами) вышла на стадию препродакшен.
  8. Категория:Средства массовой информации на языках России и аналог в английской Википедии готовы для улучшения и связывания.
  9. Викимедийцы Башкортостана запустили оффлайн Вики-школу с занятиями и домашним заданием.
  10. Викиновости:Многоязычность: Русский раздел предоставил пространство и всячески содействует развитию версий на региональных языках России.
  11. Участники Викиданных приглашают малые Википедии, желающие повысить энциклопедическую полезность раздела для его читателей, принять участие в тестировании возможностей инструмента Placeholder.
  12. В РуВики запущен проект Сайнпост-Дайджест.
  13. Размещенное на Мета-Вики описание проекта "Википедии на языках России" и его подстраницы можно не только редактировать, но и переводить на ваши родные языки. Добро пожаловать!
  14. Следующий проект коллег из БашВики - Неделя Башкортостана в РуВики.
  15. Чтобы Википедия жила вечно, Фонд Викимедиа создал Целевой финансовый фонд Wikimedia Endowment.
  16. Викимедиа РУ приветствует языки народов России - заглавная страница теперь и на казахском, на саха (якутском) и на татарском. Кто следующий?
  17. m:Wikimedia Russia теперь также и на аварском! Какой будет следующим?

Подписаться/Отписаться. Готовы поделиться своими новостями или опытом? добавляйте ссылку в следующий выпуск!

Dear colleague,

Great thanks go to each and everyone contributing into developing   Wikipedias in the languages of Russia. In this issue:

  1. PageTranslation is installed and User's content language preference recognition is set up at Wikimedia Russia wiki. Special:Translator signup
  2. Our community is about to increase: Incubator Wikipedia in Adyghe language is getting its domain soon.
  3. 'Thanks report' "discloses" kindest and most useful wiki-contributors.
  4. Machine translation started working in Bashkir Wikipedia
  5. RuSsian Wikinews published the list of most edited articles in Russian Wikipedia in 2015
  6. Statistics: first WikiStats-based full monthly report and stats.grok.se based two-year monthly Main Page Pageviews.
  7. Filming motivational and educational videos on contributing into Wikipedia and its sister projects (with subtitles) is now in pre-production.
  8. Category:Media by language of Russia and its Russian mirror are ready to be improved or linked to.
  9. Wikimedians of Bashkortostan launched offline Wiki-School with classes and homework.
  10. Викиновости:Многоязычность: Russian Wikinews is ready to lend space and otherwise support development of versions in regional languages of Russia.
  11. Wikidata participants invite small Wikipedias that want to increase own encyclopedic utility for their readers to take part in testing opportunities offered by ArticlePlaceholder feature.
  12. RuWiki partocipants launched The Signpost Digest project.
  13. "Wikipedias in the languages of Russia" project description on Meta and its sub-pages don't have to be limited to editing, you can also translate them in your mother tongues. Welcome!
  14. Next project of our colleagues from BashWiki - Bashkortostan dedicated week in RuWiki.
  15. To make Wikipedia eternal, Wikimedia Foundation has established Wikipedia Endowment.
  16. Wikimedia RU welcomes languages of Russia on its wiki - homepage materials can now be also viewed in Kazakh, in Sakha and in Tatar. Which language is going to join those next?
  17. m:Wikimedia Russia is now also available in Avar! Will your language team be the next one to join our efforts?

Subscribe/Unsubscribe. Ready to share own news or valuable experience? Add a link into the next month issue!

--Frhdkazan (talk) 12:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Kategoría rara

Hola, puedes mirar esto, por favor? Si toco el link de la subkategoría "Germany" no pasa nada... ? Me parece un poco raro. Saludos --Tschips (talk) 15:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@Tschips:   Listo, era una redirección hacia w:ig:Òtù:Jémanị; contenía una página que ya he movido a la categoría correcta.--Syum90 (talk) 15:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Ya pensé algo así. Gracias y saludos --Tschips (talk) 04:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Thnkʃ

Thank you for adding me in the right place. Amazing so quickly. Hats off to you people. --Drcenjary (talk) 10:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

@Drcenjary: you're welcome! Also you can add this template to your user page if you want. The code is {{User SWMT}}. Kind regards.--Syum90 (talk) 10:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 This user is a member of the Small Wiki Monitoring Team.

Semi-protección de la página "Ȯra Imo"

Hola, he visto que la página ig:Ȯra Imo tiene semi-protección hace 5 años... Supongo que se puede removerlo. Qué piensas tu? Saludos --Tschips (talk) 17:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Estoy de acuerdo, la he desprotegido. Saludos.--Syum90 (talk) 17:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
No sé como hacerlo... :-) --Tschips (talk) 17:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Ya has echolo! Gracias. Pensé que debería escribirlo en alguna lista... :-) --Tschips (talk) 17:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
@Tschips: no puedes hacerlo, es necesario ser administrador :-) Syum90 (talk) 18:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Sí, como no! :-) Saludos!! --Tschips (talk) 13:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

"Talking:Israel"

Ahora hay otra nueva página rara: ig:Okwu:Israel. El título del artículo significa "Talking:Israel". El texto es aleman y es algo sobre el estado de Israel. Supongo que se tenerá que borrar. Saludos, --Tschips (talk) 13:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

  Borrada--Syum90 (talk) 08:22, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Dos Kategoría del mismo tema

Hola, hay dos kategorías de Odiani: ig:Òtù:Odinani y ig:Òtù:Odinạnị, la segunda en lengua igbo. La primera ya está vacía y supongo que se puede borrarla. --Tschips (talk) 00:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

  Borrada--Syum90 (talk) 08:22, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

...y otro: podrías mirar esté artículo: ig:Ogbunabali, por favor. Hay un link [[en:Ogbunabali]] que no entiendo. --Tschips (talk) 00:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

@Tschips: Era un enlace interwiki, que ya no es necesario porque se utiliza Wikidata, lo he eliminado. Por cierto, también puedes comunicarte conmigo a través de mi página de discusión en ig.wp si te es más cómodo. Un saludo.--Syum90 (talk) 08:22, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Sería mas comodo, gracias, comunicar contigo en la igbo wikipedia. Pero ahora no existe esa página, ya lo has borrado :-) Puedo crearla? Mientras tanto hay la pagina igbo ig:Nwanne con otras enlaces. Podría borrarlas yo mismo o es cosa de administrador? Saludos --Tschips (talk) 17:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
@Tschips: He eliminado yo mismo los enlaces interwiki, pero los puede eliminar cualquiera ya que se trata de realizar una edición normal. Por supuesto puedes crear mi página de discusión en ig.wp cuando quieras :-) Saludos.--Syum90 (talk) 17:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Candidatura

Ho acabo de veure aquí i a la taverna. Vaja, sap greu, ens quedem sense qui podria haver sigut un excel·lent steward, aquest any si més no. Ànims, l'any que ve? :).--Yeza (talk) 07:56, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

@Yeza: Hola, moltíssimes gràcies pel teu suport i pel teu comentari :-) Jo ja no seré candidat però donaré suport a qualsevol usuari de la nostra comunitat que es presenti, sens dubte.--Syum90 (talk) 08:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Hola

¿Podrías terminar de traducir Admin_activity_review/Notice_to_communities/ca y revisar Admin_activity_review/Notice_to_inactive_right_holders/ca? Voy a empezar a enviar mensajes del AAR15 en breve. Un abrazo, —MarcoAurelio 18:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

@MarcoAurelio:   Listo :-) Syum90 (talk) 09:07, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio: Había pasado por alto un pequeño detalle, pero ya lo he subsanado en la Viquipèdia y en Viquinotícies. Saludos.--Syum90 (talk) 14:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Should FuzzyBot remove all potentially outdated translations?

Hello, thanks for adding multiple new translations in your language here at Meta-Wiki in recent years. Please join the discussion with your opinion: Should FuzzyBot automatically remove all potentially outdated translations?. Nemo (talk) 12:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

LG wikipeidia

New sock is blanking pages and adding vulgar messages. Suspected to be ItsLassieTime on english. 2601:184:200:8067:649B:6A61:425B:FC53 10:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Open Call for Individual Engagement Grants

Greetings! The Individual Engagement Grants (IEG) program is accepting proposals until April 12th to fund new tools, research, outreach efforts, and other experiments that enhance the work of Wikimedia volunteers. Whether you need a small or large amount of funds (up to $30,000 USD), IEGs can support you and your team’s project development time in addition to project expenses such as materials, travel, and rental space.

With thanks, I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources 15:57, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Comment by Tommaso Rossi (Top-Tom)

Excuse me, Sir, but may you offer a proper argument for deleting my USER PAGE?!? There are so many pages reffering to actors/actresses, comedians, entrepreneurs, sportsmen/women and public characters, that they are almost unaccountable. So, would you please gimme a proper reason what on earth gives you the right to choose who can publish and edit voices, which stand on the same level? That has nothing to do with treating Wikipedia as an hosting platform!!.;) I'll wait for you to fulfill all my doubts and considerations, and, before acting, to offer a proper reasonable solution!!=) Regards!!=) Tom —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tommaso Rossi (Top-Tom) (talk) 15:34, 6 April 2016 (UTC)‎

@Tommaso Rossi (Top-Tom): Hi, please note that this project is not Wikipedia; I've deleted the page because it is completely out of project scope, please see Meta:About. Regards.--Syum90 (talk) 15:47, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Requests for comment/Sysop abuse on Russian Wikipedia 2

Use {{support}}. --5.228.45.107 07:32, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Request changing protection level on ace.wikipedia's main page

Dear Syum90. I'd like to request changing protection level on main page of Acehnese Wikipedia and it's all pages linked to it to be edited by autoconfirmed users. I request since there's no active sysop there. Thank you, ··· 👦 Rachmat04 · 💬 09:00, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

@Rachmat04:   Done for the main page; please provide a list with all pages you need changing the protection level.--Syum90 (talk) 07:03, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! The main page is all I need (and also the pages which affected by the cascaded protection). ··· 👦 Rachmat04 · 💬 12:02, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
@Rachmat04:   Done, I've only found this another page protected by cascade, let me know if do you need to change the protection level of other pages.--Syum90 (talk) 12:33, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

New SPAM account on Victionarium

Hello Syum90, thanks for your recent anti-SPAM activities on the the Latin wiktionary. Today a new SPAM account has been established. If you like, please take a look at User Tfwarren. Thank you, --YaganZ (talk) 12:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

@YaganZ:   Done: Blocked, deleted the page, and locked. Thanks and regards.--Syum90 (talk) 08:43, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Correo

Hola. El sistema de notificaciones me dice que me has mandado unos correos, pero no los veo por ninguna parte en mi bandeja de entrada. ¿Te importaría mandarlos de nuevo? No están en ninguna carpeta. Un saludo, —MarcoAurelio 08:14, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

@MarcoAurelio: Hola, claro, enseguida te los envío de nuevo, contienen enlaces para suprimir contenido; si siguen sin llegarte contáctame si quieres por IRC y te los doy por allí, estoy en cualquiera de los canales especificados en mi página de usuario. Saludos.--Syum90 (talk) 08:21, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Intento conectarme al IRC, pues siguen sin llegarme. Un saludo. —MarcoAurelio 08:25, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

There are open request

There is a open request make a central notice banner here, urgent help is appreciated. Jim Carter (talk) 10:10, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

@Jim Carter:   Done, regards.--Syum90 (talk) 13:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Now Commons

91.9.118.166 18:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

  Deleted Thanks and regards.--Syum90 (talk) 19:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks to you! 91.9.118.166 21:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

91.9.118.166 21:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi, all files on pdc.wp have been already deleted; on csb.wp there is an active local admin who can do the job, please request it to him. Regards.--Syum90 (talk) 09:11, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. @csb - On 12 May 2016 at 19:21 I did request at the page of the only admin, who is almost absent [4] - 26 contribs in 2014, 9 in 2015, 5 in 2016 - before I came in. On 12 May 2016 at 19:26 he promised "I'll clean them up in the evening." [5]. The question on the following day "Which evening?" [6] is left unanswered. 91.9.104.18 09:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
All files have been   deleted. Regards.--Syum90 (talk) 09:17, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! transferred some more csb:Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:NowCommons. Also csb:Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Delete. 91.9.126.111 17:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Ten are now in Commons: csb:Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:NowCommons. 91.9.122.22 11:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
  Deleted all files transferred to Commons.--Syum90 (talk) 12:16, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Another SPAM account

Hello Syum90, thanks for your anti-SPAM actions. It seems to be a never ending story. Please take a look at User MatkaSatta. Thank you, --YaganZ (talk) 15:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

@YaganZ: Yeah, more and more spam;   account blocked and page deleted, thanks for reporting.--Syum90 (talk) 15:20, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Cross-wiki watchlists

Hi! You voted for the cross-wiki watchlist as an important suggestions in the community wishlist survey last year. I'm pinging editors who showed interest in that task to tell them we have some suggestions for how things could look, if you'd like to glance at them and give us some feedback. You can find them on the project page on Meta. If you'd like to share any comments, you're very welcome to do so on the talk page. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 00:53, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

You are so addicted to househole-made fake antique,dont you ? ^_^--VitaDei (talk) 10:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

deletion requests

Hi Syum90

Now,I want all the articles that I had created in Classical Chinese Wikipedia to be deleted,can you help?--VitaDei (talk) 18:16, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

I propose an author request for deletion today,and the local sysop called 損齋 blocked me for a month,please help.--VitaDei (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

@VitaDei: Hi, as you can see on the Meta:Deletion policy you can request deletion of your articles satisfying this rule "Deletion per request of the author, if the author is the only significant contributor, the request is not in bad faith, and the content is not to the benefit of the Meta-Wiki", and this rule is practically the same on all wikis; probably several of your creations satisfy this rule and several not. In addition to this you don't have to remove the content of the articles, this is why the admin have blocked you I think, what you have to do is speak with local admins and explain to them your motivation. Regards.--Syum90 (talk) 07:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

nope,I am the sinificant author of almost all my articles,maybe you can check them and delete it for me thanks.--VitaDei (talk) 07:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

@VitaDei: Sorry but I can't, if there are active local admins on that project, as is the case, they have to decide if the articles have to be deleted or not, not me. The only that I can do is speak with them. Anyway, why do you want to delete your creations?, have you thought enough about that?--Syum90 (talk) 07:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

because i regret writing articles there,and now i dont want to stay there anymore,and i want all my creations gone with me.they just add some links,and changed several words,i am the main contributor you know,so please do help!--VitaDei (talk) 08:03, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

and the local admin have bloked both my ip and id,i cant speak to anyone there,he just like a dictator.--VitaDei (talk) 08:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

the local active admin is temporary he is not permanant!--VitaDei (talk) 08:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

@VitaDei: It is not important if the admin is temporary or indefinite, the local admins are who should decide; you have to treat this issue with them. I've sent a comment to 損齋, you can speak with him here at Meta. If you think he/she is abusing the admin tools you can start a discussion about that at the Wikimedia Forum or open a RFC. Regards.--Syum90 (talk) 08:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Hi,here is the issue, User Vitadei requested a mass deletion of those articles that should be deleted according to his personal opinion. However, there are other users who also contributed to these articles. User vitadei should not consider those articles as personal properties or anything that he can decide on his own. These articles have no problem at all and are good articles, there are many of them and are very important to our small wikipedia, user vitadei is trying to remove these articles, I ask why, his response is that, he is mentally ill and those articles should be removed. I do not think his mental health has anything to do with the deletion and can certainly not justify his action. He also began to remove the content of "his"(according to his opinion) articles that actually have other contributers. In order to stop further destruction, I decided to block this user. ----損齋 (talk) 08:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  • I suggest user vitadei do not take it personal or take me as an offender. I am simply doing anti vandalism. Any user would have encountered the same situation if he or she were to remove articles without qualification.----損齋 (talk) 08:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

The socall other contributors just add some words and links,there is no significant contribution,all in all I am still the main author,in accordance with the policy I have the right to ask for deletion of my own creations--VitaDei (talk) 09:02, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Words are contributions. Your own creations are no longer your private properties according to the policy of Wikipedia. They are not yours. ----損齋 (talk) 09:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  • The wanting to delete articles simply because the first editor do not want it anymore is not a reasonable justification.----損齋 (talk) 09:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

I just want to send the flood to destroy what regreted to create, as God did.is that unreasonable difficult ? do I offend anyone? the policy says the main author do have the right ask for a speedy deletion,and I am the sole contributor of most of my articles namely there is no other one participanted --VitaDei (talk) 09:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

  • I do not know of your personal faith. You are not the sole contributor of these articles according to the editorial history. I am sorry but I can not delete them. You are, and only are, the first editor of these articles. These articles have no problems and should not be deleted by your will.----損齋 (talk) 09:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

some do,the other not,please check it carefuly and delete it please.last time when i propose a speedy deletion request by the author,and the article was deleted very quickly by other global admin!--VitaDei (talk) 09:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

  • I do not see why.----損齋 (talk) 09:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

I want to leave the Classical Chinese Wikipedia now,and I want all my stupid works to be gone with me. --VitaDei (talk) 09:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

  • What can be deleted are those articles with 1 contributor, which is you, and is very partial or poorly written. Any articles that have multiple editors will not be deleted. ----損齋 (talk) 09:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

okay just delete those one contributor craps--VitaDei (talk) 09:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

By the way,please delete my userpage there also,thanks--VitaDei (talk) 09:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Understood. You are welcome. God speed. ----損齋 (talk) 09:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Well, after reading your comments I'm quite agree with 損齋, and he/she is who should decide; I fully understand his/her decision on not to delete the articles. VitaDei, the Meta:Deletion policy is aplicable only at Meta, I've mentioned it only as an orientation; other wikis have its own deletion policies, generally very similar, but at the end a local admin should decide, and in this case the local admin has already decided. If there is another local admin at the wiki you can request his/her opinion or mediation, if not you can request mediation to another local user. Anyway I'm happy seeing that you 損齋 and VitaDei are just achieving an accordance :-) Syum90 (talk) 09:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

I've never said I have mental problem, what I mean is that I think contribute wikipedia in an ancient language is stupid, how come he insult me like that! I don't like the local admin ,that is why I decided to leave , He is unjust and always attack others in a mocking way .I really don't like that guy!--VitaDei (talk) 09:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

He is now against the promise as he reject to delete those sole-author articles! https://zh-classical.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:近易 --VitaDei (talk) 10:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

  • What I said is:I will delete those with 1 contrubutor and in the same time are very partial and poorly written.----損齋 (talk) 10:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Your personal opinion upon me is irrelevant.You do not need to love or like me. ----損齋 (talk) 10:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Well, alright ! you can keep them,since you are so addicted to them !I don't mind.--VitaDei (talk)

  • I did not insult you. here is what you have said:吾今欲退大典。作者有權提刪己文。(嘗有日本人謂拉丁文、漢文、世界語等寫維基皆中二發病,我今欲止吾中二之行矣。)

The sentence 嘗有日本人謂拉丁文、漢文、世界語等寫維基皆中二發病,我今欲止吾中二之行矣。 Means as follow: Once there is a Japanese said that editing Latin,Classical Chinese, and Esperanto is the breaking out of the illness of "2nd year Junior high school".(A Japanese way of saying “naive”), and I(user vitadei) want to stop my 2nd year of junior high school-like behavior. I view it as a statement of the mental state of User vitadei. ----損齋 (talk) 10:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

What I want to say is that writing ancient language with people like you is so bored and naive, now I want to quit.et Those who always vandalise the lovely small place,they are your sockpuppets I believe! bro --VitaDei (talk) 10:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)


I think we should close all the wiki wich written in ancient dead and artificial languages don't we? it is useless and naive!--VitaDei (talk) 10:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC)


  • You can perform a user check. Otherwise your sentences does not have any effects. This accusation is serious, I would also request a usercheck if User vitadei agrees?----損齋 (talk) 10:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  • User vitadei removed his accusation that I use sock puppets. But if he still want do a user check, i will request it. For i have nothing to fear on this matter. ----損齋 (talk) 10:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

損齋,my dear lad,be happy with ancient toys,I am nomore with you--VitaDei (talk) 10:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Maybe Classical Chinese and Latin (or other languages such as Sanskrit) do not fit you. I am an editor only. That is it. God speed. ----損齋 (talk) 10:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

You are so addicted to househole-made fake antique,dont you ? ^_^--VitaDei (talk) 10:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Mocking is of no use. Take it easy and a deep breath.----損齋 (talk) 10:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  • I do not mind if they close Latin, C Chinese, Anglisc or Sanskrit. I am an editor of Wikipedia and I also edit English wikipedia as well. However, as I have said, your opinion upon those languages (from your Japanese friend) have nothing to do with the issue today.----損齋 (talk) 10:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Japanese people,they are very smart and wise,as they closed the ridiculous Classical Japanese Version.(just to ban nerds like you Haha )--VitaDei (talk) 10:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

  • I think the situation is clear now. @Syum90 I think that what he has said is offensive, his side of this talk can no longer be constructive.----損齋 (talk) 10:54, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  • User vitadei, do you have anything else to say other than your offensive personal opinion upon me and Classical Chinese, Latin and other languages?----損齋 (talk) 10:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

I don't see any useful contributions you made in English wikipeidia,what I saw is that you always argue with people! and in Japanese wiki,you never speak japanese properly,in stead, you always use your okashi(ridiculous) classical chinese.(french wiki also^_^)--VitaDei (talk) 10:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)


  • As I have said, irrelevant accusations with no facts or partial opinions are of no use. Have you got anything else to say on today's topic?----損齋 (talk) 11:00, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  • I see you looked at all my contribs, I am impressed........So, anything else?----損齋 (talk) 11:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

I wont speak to you again, sayounara sonsai kun!hahahaha I --VitaDei (talk) 11:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

  • I see, Please, if it is still possible, do not take it personal. I have no opinion upon you. Good bye. ----損齋 (talk) 11:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

oh! I should tell you,VitaDei means God's life in Latin, It is not God speed . latinic people know that.how come you claim you speak spanish anyway, Syum90 is spanish people,can you communicate with him in spanish ?--VitaDei (talk) 11:10, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

  • ........God speed 是指一路順風,我沒有說你的名字,我一直在說一路順風。我根本不關心你Vitadei是什麼意思。
  • I have explained that when I say God speed I mean good bye to him. He might have not understood what I have said.----損齋 (talk) 11:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

You claimed you know spanish and japanese, I want you prove it now.--VitaDei (talk) 11:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Look at yourself Vitadei. You have been like this all this afternoon, I hope you can find peace in your heart. Good bye.
  • Mira Vitadei, ya estaba tocando conmigo toda la tarde, Yo no sé porque tampoco sé la razon de su comportamiento hoy. Ojala tenga su paz de corazon.
  • My japanese is elementary. that is it. ----損齋 (talk) 11:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

君好自為之。--VitaDei (talk) 11:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)


Please stop, I will not tolerate any insult or underestimation more. @VitaDei: please note that 損齋 is trying to help you, and his attitude is very positive in my opinion, but don't forget that he has to protect the wiki, this is the most important. Please conclude this confrontation.--Syum90 (talk) 11:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Contributions are licensed under GFDL and CC-BY-SA. Revocation is not permitted. It can harm a Wikipedia to delete content, only because someone feels so. E.g. user U writes a perfect article A. No one ever touches it, because it was perfect or other things were more important. The article is used by others via reading, linking etc. Then suddenly user U wants it to be deleted. Maybe there have been users in the meantime that would have written parts of the article, but since the content was there already, they had no incentive to do so. It looks very weird to remove the content in these cases. 91.9.119.49 15:39, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Central Notice request

Copied to RFH.--Syum90 (talk) 18:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, we need a central notice for the upcoming Train-the-Trainer event. Train-the-Trainer is a national-level Wikievent in India that attempts to groom leadership skills among the Indian Wikimedia community members. This is going to be the third iteration and it will be conducted between 15-17 June 2016 in Bangalore. Editors from all Indian Wiki-communities are expected to participate in this event. Please learn more about the event at: TTT or see this year's event page at TTT2016.

Proposed banner details

  • Language: English
  • Start date: Now
  • End date: 31 May
  • End time: 12:00 UTC
  • Geo-target: India
  • Project: Wikipedia
  • text1: Train-the-Trainer (2016) will be held between 15-17 June in Bangalore. See details.

Thanks. -- Tito Dutta (talk) 18:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

@Titodutta: Hi, I'm sorry so much but I can't do it today because I have to go right now, I've copied your request at RFH in order to be attended by another user. Thanks and regards.--Syum90 (talk) 18:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I have made minor changes in the notice there . If the request is not attended if possible please check the request when you'll get time. Thanks and regards. -- Tito Dutta (talk) 18:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Could you check it please? -- Tito Dutta (talk) 18:12, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

  Done. Sorry for the delay, I have not could connect to the wiki until today.--Syum90 (talk) 09:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of some pages on Kannada Wikisource

Some pages have be marked for Deletion on kn.wikisource.org. I request you to delete them as soon as possible. You can find those pages in this link-(https://kn.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%B2%B5%E0%B2%B0%E0%B3%8D%E0%B2%97:Deletion_requests&action=edit&redlink=1)--Ananth subray (talk) 08:03, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

All pages have been   deleted. Regards.--Syum90 (talk) 11:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Syum90/Archives/2016-01".