Hello, and welcome to meta, a multilingual wiki for meta-content and discussions about the Wikimedia projects. Wiki welcome

You can get started in a few ways:

You can also leave me a message if you have any questions! SJ+ 16:01, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Global bans policy discussion edit

At Requests for comment/Global bans, where you have commented in support of Option 2, a third option has recently been implemented. The first two options did not prove a way for respondents to indicate that they oppose global bans entirely, i.e., that it is not possible to write a meaningful global bans policy that would attract their support. Option 3 is intended to provide that opportunity, and to aid in distinguishing between people who oppose the proposed policy because it requires improvements and those who oppose the proposed policy because no policy permitting global bans should be adopted.

Because the third section was added late by a respondent, it is possible that some people who responded early in the RFC have commented at option 2, but would really prefer to support option 3, or support both. If so, you may voluntarily choose to move your original comment or to or strikethrough your original comment and add new comments. This is a courtesy notice of the change, and there is no requirement that you take any action. WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:41, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

thekohser would like to speak with you edit

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=30173#p30173. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 14:38, 15 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

I actually only saw this message yesterday and then went to check the Facebook thing, which apparently doesn't notify you or anything about stuff in the "Other" message folder. And, yeah, no thanks. This isn't actually of any real importance to him, he just wants to get his kicks in about comments I made on an obscure Wikipedia page that no one else is going to read. Silver seren (talk) 19:22, 18 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Actually, even if they do read that page, they won't see your comments since an anon removed the comments. thekohser wishes to clear up a misunderstanding: http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=29937#p29937. Aren't you concerned that your claims might be inaccurate? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 00:23, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
I think the fact that he accepted a job to whitewash an article of any criticism isn't all that much different than if he then went and did it or not. And the fact that the material in question was subsequently removed from the article is suspicious enough. Perhaps it wasn't him, fine, but then it was still someone involved with the person he accepted the job from. Silver seren (talk) 00:30, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply