User talk:M7/Older talk 2

Latest comment: 14 years ago by LaPizia in topic Re:Oh!

Sysop Edit

Thanks for the rights & the support - regards --Herby talk thyme 09:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have mail btw --Herby talk thyme 14:40, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bot flag on meta Edit

Hi M/. As a bureaucrat on meta, could you please take a look at Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat#Dellie: Meta bot? Thanks in advance! guillom 10:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi M7, thanks for your comment on Requests for help. The name of the bot is User:DellieBot. Cheers, Tangotango 04:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User rename Edit

Mi rinomineresti in User:Helios ? Helios89 16:13, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fatto --M/ 14:24, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oops :S Edit

I was running a script that has worked before and apparently something has changed as to make the script not work. Thanks for undoing me so fast :) Now I have to go and see what has changed to make this script not work :P. Again thanks. —— Eagle101 Need help? 23:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

heh, thats why the revert button is there :P, I'm fixing the script now so I can get at this spam blacklist backlog :P —— Eagle101 Need help? 23:24, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oversight Edit

Didn't find revision number? Uhm, mai capitato di cliccare sulla data dell'edit nella cronologia della pagina? (Devi prima recuperarla.) --.anaconda 03:56, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Ed Edd & Eddy Style Edit

Ciao, potresti bloccarlo pure qua? È lo stesso di Wikiquote. Chiedo a te perché non hai riportato i risultati. Grazie :-) --.anaconda 22:36, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

grazie :-) Edit

molto grazie per il traduzione molto veloce! ciao, oscar 00:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sei sempre il benvenuto :) --M/ 00:29, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

re: translation Edit

You're welcome! :D ~Rex••talk•• 14:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request for CheckUser information processed Edit

Hello M7. Your request for CheckUser information has been granted and archived (see "ajerra@it.wikibooks, caucciù@it.wikipedia & LpL@wikipedia-it"). —{admin} Pathoschild 22:26:13, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

grazie Edit

Ciao M7, mille grazie per la traduzione :) --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 23:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Stewards/elections 2007/statements/Adambro Edit

Thanks for taking the time to translate my statement. Regards. Adambro 17:02, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Translation Edit

Thanks for translation in Italian. I have just one note: Sorbian is lusaziano :) --Millosh 13:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks Edit

For the 'crat flag, feel free to let me know if I get anything wrong :) Regards --Herby talk thyme 12:01, 20 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It seems... Edit

that you or someone else forgot to translate Oscar's blip here when the rest of the page was translated. Would you mine just finishing the translation of that section? :-) Cbrown1023 talk 04:28, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Looks like you've done it. Grazie! :-) Cbrown1023 talk 19:22, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Grazie Edit

Per la tua traducione  --Aphaia 00:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RE: Sections Edit

Actually I divided them into sections because then it would be easier to vote, and also avoid from edit conflicts. Maybe the user you mentioned got to modify his automated edit summary and then go and split into sections... --Edmund the King of the Woods! 23:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK I'm going to ask him. Then the election will be fair - just imagine if voter A support, then he/she/it has edit conflict with voter B who oppose... --Edmund the King of the Woods! 00:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yeah, only experienced Wikimedians can vote, but the problem is not here. I'm just afraid that someone may play trick and then... --Edmund the King of the Woods! 00:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Checkuser-user Edit

I am now likely to go through checkuser voting on huwiki. Is it possible to create a separate user (a "sockpuppet") just for having the checkuser rights? This would be useful for password safety reasons. I use my account often, and from public computers as well as from home. CU is not for everyday use. Bináris 22:25, 6 December 2007 (UTC) → Transferred to itwiki. Bináris 22:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please allow a couple of days, since CU policy is WMF's matter and I'm going to repeat your question. Thank you, --M/ 22:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Changing username Edit

I confirm my own request placed on en.wikibooks. --M/ 09:40, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sounds fine, please create an account under an alternate (throwaway name), leave me a note, and I'll change your name to M7 :). --SB_Johnny|talk|books 09:58, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey there! Edit

Hey there M7! I've noticed that you aren't very active on the Simple English Wikipedia, and here is me asking if you would be able to be maybe a little more active on the Simple English Wikipedia? Please let me know, Razorflame 18:24, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My spare time is a little bit low at the moment, but I like a lot :) Thank you, M/ 18:30, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

checkuser Edit

Hello, how do I exactly confirm my identity, and for who? Please help in that. Cheers, SyP 14:32, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You've to contact Cary Bass, using "E-mail this user" function. He will be glad to help you. --M/ 14:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for the help! Syp 15:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My successful request for adminship Edit

Thank you for supporting my request for adminship with 28 supports unopposed.--Jusjih 00:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Input Edit

Your input would be appreciated on closing this. Please see the talk page. Thanks, Majorly (talk) 00:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Confirmation edit Edit

This is my own edit to --M/ 14:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seen, action in progress :-) SpeedyGonsales 15:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done. SpeedyGonsales 15:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you
--M/ 15:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Confirmation edit Edit

This is my own edit to --M/ 15:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done ;). — Svetko 16:10, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Confirmation edit Edit

This is my own edit to --M/ 15:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Renaming done. - Kaare 16:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Confirmation edit Edit

This is my own edit to --M/ 16:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Confirmation edit Edit

This is my own edit to --M/ 16:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done. -- Olve 17:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

could you look at this again Edit

Steward_requests/Permissions#Personne@lawikisource. John Vandenberg 03:54, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gabriel Beecham Edit

Je suis profondément choqué qu'un steward puisse retirer l'accès de sysop d'un utilisateur sur la simple demande d'un autre utilisateur sans aucune vérification sur le sérieux de la demande. "Cacao" n'apparaît que depuis le 31 juillet, n'a fait qu'une vingtaine de contributions, dont la plupart sont très discutables - à la limite du vandalisme-. En quoi est-il légitime que cet individu réclame la suppression du statut d'administrateur d'un contributeur inscrit depuis plusieurs années ? Même s'il est vrai que Gabriel n'est plus actif depuis plusieurs mois, et que le retrait de son statut soit justifiable, Cacao n'a aucune légitimité à faire cette démarche. Si la demande provenait de la communauté des utilisateurs actifs, il en serait autrement. Je ne demande pas le rétablissement des droits de Gabriel Beecham, mais un peu plus de circonspection lors de telles demandes. Grazie mille Arno Lagrange  20:49, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Il s'agit de Steward_requests/Permissions/2008-08#Gabriel_BEECHAM.40eo_vikipedio

J'ajoute : Cacao t'a induit en erreur en citant le règlement de Vikipedio. La première ligne -qu'il n'a pas citée- dit "Maladministantigi uzulon povas stevardo laŭ peto de la esperanta vikipedia komunumo en jenaj kazoj " soit "Un steward peut enlever les droits d'admin d'un utilsateur à la demande la communauté des wikipédiens espérantistes dans les cas suivants :". Cacao n'a aucune légitimité à parler en nom de la communauté, il n'a consulté personne et joue de l'ambiguïté du mot "anonci" qui peut être compris comme informé après ou avant un événement. Cacao est un troll et il s'est bien joué de nous. Arno Lagrange  21:00, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As an admin of the eo Wikipedia, I would like to add another voice to Arno's. Cacao/Kakao has been on our Wiki for less than a week, has done minor nonsensical vandalism to the main discussion page. We have two very active stewards who treat issues like granting and revoking of sysop rights. It is generally a task left up to the community as stated in our policy. A single user who has been on one week does not speak for the community. If you have any future issues dealing with EO:WP, please contact Arno or me. I ask that you restore Gabriel's sysop rights. -- Yekrats 21:14, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am withdrawing my request, but in the future I ask that you be much more careful. You let a troll (who has only been active in Wikipedia a week) select statements out of our policy to trick you into revoking Gabriel's sysop rights. What should have happened is: He should have gone to the community, and the community should have discussed it and possibly revoked it. Yes, we use the word aŭtomate, but what Kakao did not tell you about was the clause right after that "At the request of the Wikipedia community". There was certainly no consensus of the Wikipedia community.
My point is: If you do not speak a language, you should be much more careful about granting or revoking rights in that Wikipedia!!! Certainly, you should check with the community there first. What you did was wrong. In the future, if you ever have a question about the EO:WP, you can generally bring it up in the Diskutejo in your preferred language and generally someone will answer your question soon. -- Yekrats 23:07, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Revoking Gabriel's rights should sound right. The big problem is how it has been done. Cacao has none legitimity to talk for esperanto wikipedia community and steward should check that before revoking rights. Arno Lagrange  21:32, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks Edit

And yes, I will remain active on pl.wikipedia, but without sysop tools. :) Lajsikonik 03:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

151.49... Edit

See mailing list. ;) --Thogo (talk) 00:42, 30 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

grazie :) Edit

Ciao M7, thanks for that. This one made me laugh I hope You too because laughing is healthy, kind regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 16:05, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Confirmation of user rights Edit


Just letting you know that your user rights are up for confirmation this quarter; the discussion is currently taking place at Meta:Administrators/confirm.

Daniel (talk) 00:13, 1 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Translation Edit

Thanks for the translation. --Erwin(85) 17:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Translate Edit

Thank you for providing the Italian translation of my statement.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 19:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Confirmations Edit

Sorry, I couldn't help but notice this, which seems to imply that bureaucrats' opinions or votes carry more weight than those of "ordinary" users. Surely bureaucrats are not elected to elect admins (or remove them) but rather to determine whether the community wants someone to be an admin (or have it removed)?! Your opinions should have been voiced at Meta:Administrators/confirm already - your job as a bureaucrat is to weigh up the opinions found there - not have a bureaucrat-vote to see what the bureaucrats want. Please reconsider what you're doing here, as it's improper, IMO.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 20:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See the talk page of the page... Majorly talk 20:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

:-) Edit

Yes!!! Sorry i was too eager and didnt read the notification that voting starts later :-). Will i have to vote again in order my voice to get counted? مبتدئ 22:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok no problem!! I have to apologize (my mistake). Thanks for your hints!!! مبتدئ 22:38, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re Edit

but... --Wmrwiki 04:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: Edit

Grazie a te di averle sistemate! :-) ^musaz 21:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

reversion Edit

Hello M7, I have reverted this [1], because I guess it was a missunderstanding, it was just a translation of the statement not a voting, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 22:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

P.S. please can You consider to unprotect Your talkpage for anons? Thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 22:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No worries, no harm done, but I had to laugh now that "ja" made You think of "yes" :)))
Kind regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 23:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

cancellazione Edit

Ciao, scusa la mia meta-ignoranza, ma come si fa a mettere in immediata una pagina su meta? perchè questo utente è privo di requisiti e la sua candidatura andrebbe rimossa. Grazie e buon lavoro,^musaz † 11:35, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Uh grazie! tralaltro non sapevo fossi amministratore pure su qua. Ciao, ^musaz † 13:55, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply] Edit

Can you provide some input here? Given that it was spambot abuse that got it blacklisted, I doubt that there is any need to remove the domain, but I'd like to have some perspective. Thanks  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks Edit

Thanks for your work. Alex Pereira falaê 19:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re:Oh! Edit

Dai, non è mica un addio...ho solo bisogno di aprire Wikipedia senza avere come primo pensiero "che rogna mi tocca oggi?", tutto qua ;-) Bacix --LaPizia 17:46, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Return to the user page of "M7/Older talk 2".