Steward requests/Permissions/2008-08

Administrator access

Black Kite@enwiki

The following discussion is closed.

I request restoration of sysop access. Voluntarily given up previously for a wikibreak. Link to request for removal - [1].

  • Language Code: EN
  • Local Request Link: Not applicable. Proof of ID - [2].
  • Local User Page: En:User:Black Kite

Thank you. Black Kite 20:00, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

  Not done. If it was non-dramatical removal, then you should have no problems requesting at local bureaucrats. --FiliP × 20:02, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Ah, sorry - I thought I had to do it here! Black Kite 20:06, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Your request has been posted to the local bureaucrat noticeboard. Please keep an eye on this section in case they have questions or concerns. Thank you. Kylu 21:59, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Granted locally. Kylu 23:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

str4nd@fi wikisource

I request sysop access.

Thank you. — str4nd 19:34, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

One vote wasn't enough so I did another request which will end in two weeks. — str4nd 19:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: Archived. A new request will be posted in two weeks. Kylu 22:08, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

str4nd@fi wikisource (2)

I request sysop access.

Thank you. str4nd 18:43, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done--Shanel 20:22, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


I request sysop access.

Thank you. Gondnok 21:50, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done, please remember to upload preferably at commons: and to translate the interface at betawiki: only, thank You, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 22:02, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

American Eagle@simple wikiquote

I request that sysop access be given to user American Eagle. Thank you. Coppertwig 23:18, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done ++Lar: t/c 01:45, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


I request temporary sysop access.

Thank you. - Innv 02:48, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Ok, it expires 2 Aug 2008--Nick1915 - all you want 03:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
removed--Nick1915 - all you want 08:52, 2 August 2008 (UTC)


I request temporary sysop access.

Thank you. - Innv 08:54, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Expires 3 Aug 2008--Cspurrier 16:25, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
removed. --Thogo (talk) 09:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access


Please grant bureaucrat access to cedric31@oc.wikiccionari

Thanks. Cedric31 07:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done --Thogo (talk) 10:22, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Coppertwig@simple wikiquote

I request Bureaucrat access.

Thank you. American Eagle (talk) 07:34, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

  On hold voting started on 13. August. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 09:59, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Would you complete it now? It's now been a week. Thanks :) American Eagle (talk) 01:33, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

  DoneDan | talk 03:58, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


The following discussion is closed.

I request bureaucrat access.

Please let me know if I rather should apply for temporary access. Our bureaucrat does neither reply on e-mail nor is he active on the project; I therefore locally nominated myself to become a bureaucrat. --EivindJ 12:10, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

  On hold. As that bureaucrat has deleted his or her own user and talk pages, I wonder if s/he is vanishing without resigning. If so, you may want to discuss locally if that bureaucrat should be demoted. For the size of your community, I endorse your temporary access for 3 months. After that, you may then decide whether to continue as a bureaucrat per community opinion.--Jusjih 17:29, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
I am more than happy with a temporary access of three months, if you can provide me with that. After three months we will probably know better what to do, and we can figure out if the other 'crat wants to demote or not. Thanks. --EivindJ 22:52, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
  Not done In principle, temporary bureaucratships are not granted. You can ask the stewards for assistance where you normally would approach the bureaucrat (in case he is and remains inactive). It might be advisable to reconsider as a community whether you want the bureaucrat to remain in function at all. (makes asking stewards somewhat easier) Effeietsanders 16:31, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
That's ok. Soon we'll have global bot policy, which will give my bot and the other active one bot flag. I will ask the community to decide what to do regarding 'crats. --EivindJ 21:54, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


I request bureaucrat access.

Thank you. ~Innvs: 16:00, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done--Shizhao 11:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

CheckUser access


Please grant checkuser access to Cruccone@it.wikipedia due to successful poll

Thanks. --Brownout(msg) 10:13, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

  On hold please provide to send your identification to the Foundation--Nick1915 - all you want 12:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
STILL   On hold... This has been on hold for a long time. I have sent Cruccone another mail, using the en and it versions of the template. I hope that helps. ++Lar: t/c 13:41, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Cruccone's it.wikipedia user talk page says Cruccone is moving, and the user hasn't edited since 29 June 2008. I think this may be on hold for a while. :| Kylu 16:01, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
  Done Identified to Foundation (confirmation link: [4]) and bit set by Thogo at 17:58, 26 August 2008 UTC ++Lar: t/c 19:17, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


Please grant CheckUser acces to user Fluff on svwiki.

Thank you. --Caesar 19:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

  On hold until identification has been provided to the foundation.--Shanel 19:55, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment Identification information has been e-mailed. /Fluff 11:19, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
  Done per Cary's edit. --FiliP × 17:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


Please grant checkuser access to Cspurrier@en.wikinews due to a successful request for access. (25 unanimous supports)

Note: ID already confirmed, see [5]

Thank you, Cirt 20:47, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done --FiliP × 20:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
That was fast, thanks FiliP ! - Cirt 21:41, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


Please grant checkuser access to Brianmc@en.wikinews due to a successful request for access. (32 unanimous supports)

Thank you, Cirt 06:19, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

  On hold please provide to send your identification to the Foundation--Nick1915 - all you want 10:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
See Identification_noticeboard, both Brians are already identified. ++Lar: t/c 16:54, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 16:52, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

And welcome back! I'll turn your subscription back on as soon as I remember your email. Now get to work! ++Lar: t/c 16:54, 8 August 2008 (UTC)


Please grant checkuser access to Brian@en.wikinews due to a successful request for access. (32 unanimous supports)

Thank you, Cirt 06:19, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

  On hold please provide to send your identification to the Foundation--Nick1915 - all you want 10:40, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
As a previous wikinews checkuser, and also as I am OTRS I have all ready identifyed - have asked cary to confirm. Thanks Brian Wikinews / Talk 16:32, 8 August 2008 (UTC) :)

  Done. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 16:52, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

And welcome back! I'll turn your subscription back on as soon as I remember your email. Now get to work! ++Lar: t/c 16:54, 8 August 2008 (UTC)


Please grant checkuser access to Skenmy@en.wikinews due to a successful request for access. (26 unanimous supports)

Note: ID already confirmed, see [6]

Thank you, Cirt 00:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done, user is confirmed. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:47, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

SB Johnny@commonswiki

Please grant checkuser access to SB Johnny at Commonswiki after a successful request.

SB Johnny is already identified to the foundation, and is already on the CU mailing list, since he holds CU on 2 other wikis, so there is no need to wait for identification.

This vote was discussed at Commons:Administrators/Requests and votes/SB Johnny (checkuser)/Bureaucrats discussion, where a consensus was reached on which votes to include and which to disregard. I was a significant part of the discussion, so I recuse from any Steward action regarding this matter. Please review the vote, and the bureaucrat discussion, as well as the associated talk pages, to validate that this is a true and accurate statement of the consensus outcome of this matter.

Thanks. ++Lar: t/c 17:15, 7 August 2008 (UTC) Thanks.

  Done --FiliP × 00:11, 8 August 2008 (UTC)


I request local checkuser access after receiving 25 supports without opposition.

Thank you. Jusjih 00:56, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

As a steward, already identified to Foundation...   Done and good luck with your new tasks. ++Lar: t/c 01:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Erkan Yilmaz@enwikiversity

Please anable CU access for Erkan Yilmaz, who has sufficient votes.

Thank you. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 01:49, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

On hold pending identification to the Foundation. ++Lar: t/c 01:53, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
  Done --Thogo (talk) 10:03, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Oversight access


The following discussion is closed.

I request Oversight access for en:User:Newyorkbrad.

User:Newyorkbrad on Wikipedia english. For the arbitration committee. FloNight 01:48, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Request confirmed. This is a resumption of oversight access I had between January 2008 (when I became a member of En-wiki ArbCom) and April 2008 (when I had to retire temporarily as a result of external events). I have already identified to the Office in late December 2007. Newyorkbrad 01:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
  On hold, until he is confirmed, thanks, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 01:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
This diff by Cary Bass confirms he is identified to the foundation (per last request)..--Cometstyles 02:14, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
  Done, [7], best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 02:15, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
  • From initial request to archiving in 17 minutes. That's efficiency. Kylu 02:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Removal of access

Inactive sysops@commonswiki

Will have to be de-sysoped because of this. The commons policy is here. I am sad to tell this. abf /talk to me/ 09:26, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
  Done --FiliP × 10:01, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Dani@huwiki, Dani@huwikinews

I request removal of my sysop and bureaucrat access in Hungarian Wikipedia, sysop access in Hungarian Wikinews.

Thank you. Dani (vita) 12:41, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done and thanks for all your work. --FiliP × 12:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


Please remove my 'crat access on Commons - I am insufficiently active.

Thanks. Herby talk thyme 11:52, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done :( Please let it reinstate whenever you want! :) Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:56, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks --Herby talk thyme 12:05, 30 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of my checkuser access.

Thank you. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 15:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done es:Drini 15:30, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much, drini. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 18:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of my sysop access.

Thank you. ▪ Eskimo 13:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done --FiliP × 14:07, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks ;). ▪ Eskimo 14:32, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Multiple@zh wikipedia

According to zh.wp policy zh:Wikipedia:管理員的離任/提請取消不活動管理員的權限, removed Zhuwq@zhwiki, Louer@zhwiki 下一次登录@zhwiki sysop status. --Shizhao 09:02, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of my checkuser access.

I no longer need checkuser access. Thank you. Daedalus 19:04, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done. Thank you for your service. ++Lar: t/c 19:19, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
PS note, sv.wp still has two CUs, Ceasar and Fluff [8] but it might be prudent to urge the commmunity to consider additional CUs. ++Lar: t/c 19:23, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
I think they'll do fine with two CU's, since they're both active (I haven't been active lately, which is why I no longer need the CU bit.). Daedalus 17:31, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Sogeking, Alfreddo, Davide21@it.wiktionary

I request removal of sysop access for users: wikt:it:User:Sogeking, wikt:it:User:Alfreddo & wikt:it:User:Davide21

Thank you. Wim b 22:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

All done.--Shanel 22:47, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Old Account @ testwiki

The following discussion is closed: done

Please revoke this accounts sysop and bcrat flag. Thanks. -- Cat chi? 23:23, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Done (self-request). —{admin} Pathoschild 23:25:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of valepert's sysop access.

Thank you. Helios 19:59, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done --Thogo (talk) 20:04, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Mercy@cs wikipedia

The following discussion is closed.

I request removal of his sysop access.

  • Language Code: cs
  • Local Confirmation/Request Link: none, see below.
  • Local User Page: cs:User:Mercy

I have been blocked on cs: on 23 August 2005 (exactly 3 years ago). On 23 May 2006 it was changed into 1 year, on 18 September 2007 into indefinitive. The only real reason behind this was to enable mocking me without possibility for defending myself. To remind only recent cases:

  1. -jkb- on 27 April 2008: Such reactions [of sysop Vrba] remind me of uncontrolled effusions of unsavable alcoholics ("takové reakce na mne dělají dojem nekontrolovaných výlevů nezachranitelných alkoholiků").[9] Then he compared me to sysop Vrba: "Obávám se, že reakce vašeho kolegy Vrby nechávají tušit, že zdejší komunita jednoho Z nechtěla, ale druhého chce."[10]
  2. Egg in May 2008 misused my real name as symbol of a bad behaviour: 1, 2, 3 a 4.
  3. Cynik on 20 August 2008: 1 a 2.

Because I am blocked, I asked all Czech sysops to remove this libel and to block Cynik. Sysop Mercy have replied to me: "I am sorry, but I refuse to fulfil my sysop's duty. You caused your problems by your attacs outside the Wikipedia." Yes, I agree that I had criticised bad sysops like Mercy many times on my blog and so does cs:Patrick Zandl[11] and widely read magazine cs:Reflex (časopis)[12]. But this is no reason for intentional breaching of en:WP:BAN: "As such, it is inappropriate to bait banned users or take advantage of their ban to mock them."

That's why I ask for sysopping of Mercy. Thank you. —Guy Peters 09:56, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

This is not the place to discuss such matters. We won't remove anyone's permissions without community approval.   Not done --FiliP × 09:59, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Phoebe@av wikipedia

I request removal of my sysop access.

I had sysop status on avwiki briefly way back in 2006 for a single wikimania-related edit. Rediscovered when I went to SUL. Clearly, I no longer need it ... thanks! phoebe 03:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done, thank You, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 03:46, 23 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of my bot with sysop access.

Thank you. ZorroIII 21:00, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done--Shanel 21:04, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Chet B Long@enwiki

I request removal of my sysop access.

Thank you. Chet B Long 05:49, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

  •   Comment Verified request is valid on enwiki. Thunderhead 06:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
    •   Done --FiliP × 08:33, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Paul August@enwiki

I request removal of my oversight access.

Thank you. Paul August 17:41, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done And thank you for your work. --M/ 17:43, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of my sysop access.

Thank you. PeterSymonds 06:07, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done, thank you for your work!--Nick1915 - all you want 10:09, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of my sysop access.

Thank you. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 23:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done and thanks for your work. --FiliP × 23:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


The administrator Janas is in accordance with the rules for the Norwegian language Wikipedia no longer regarded as active and should thus have his admin rights removed. His last edit was 12. december 2007 and he have had less than 50 edits the last year. The rule says no edits for the last six months and more than 50 edits last year. Ulflarsen 15:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

The local rule says might have their adminrights removed, and not shall. Would recommend this not be done before local debate. Laaknor 15:37, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
The user should anyhow be notified. Jeblad 15:58, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
  Not done, please make it first clear locally what to do and then open a request here, many thanks for Your understanding, best regards, (4 votes for removal? ), --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 21:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of access.

Thank you. —YourEyesOnly 08:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done --FiliP × 08:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

LX@commons and svwikipedia

I request removal of my administrative privileges.

Thank you. LX (talk, contribs) 21:17, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your work.
--M/ 21:19, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
M7! You should not work so fast! I want to assert that LX has resigned his adminship without allowing anyone to have the opportunity to discuss the matter with him (much less a staff member of the very organization that is persistently cited in this matter). And he can apply for immediate reinstatement at any time he wishes. Cary Bass demandez 21:26, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Cary, you're always welcome!
And, sincerely, I also hope so.
I'd will gladly see flags given back to him, if he changes his mind.
Thanks, M/ 21:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Cary, I genuinely appreciate your concern, but I've given it plenty of thought, and my decision is final. Given the nature of the reason for my request, I am grateful to have it processed swiftly. LX (talk, contribs) 21:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Ilya Voyager@ru wikiquote

I request removal of my temp sysop access.

Thank you :) Ilya Voyager 10:08, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done --FiliP × 10:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of my sysop, bureacrat and checkuser access.

  • Language Code: sk
  • Local Confirmation/Request Link: [18]
  • Local User Page: sk:User:Liso

Thank you. Liso 20:53, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done As I said, we will discuss the CU issue. --Thogo (talk) 20:59, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of my bureaucrat access.

Thank you. Archer7 10:19, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done, thank You for Your work as crat there, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 10:30, 17 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of my sysop access.

Thank you. BokicaK 18:23, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done --Thogo (talk) 18:35, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Ryo@fr Wikipedia

Removal of sysop rights. Reason: More than 6 months of inactivity.

Thanks in advance. Poppy 17:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

A message on the relevant user talk has already been placed. Thanks...
--M/ 19:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Jyp@fr Wikipedia

Removal of sysop rights. Reason: More than 6 months of inactivity.

Thanks in advance. Poppy 17:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

A message on the relevant user talk has already been placed. Thanks...
--M/ 19:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of my sysop access.

Thank you, 19:56, 12 August 2008 (UTC) (Hanno)

  Done, thank You for Your work there, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

I request removal of my sysop access.

  • Language Code: en
  • Local Confirmation/Request Link: (link)
  • Local User Page: (link)

I've resigned before; this time with full realisation of the magnitude of the consequences. I won't be reseeking the administrator tools on Wikipedia anytime in the future. If you could fulfill this request promptly, I would appreciate that. Thank you for your time. Kind regards, Rudget (talk) 19:34, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your help and work... Farewell or see you later, as you wish :)
--M/ 19:39, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your (quick) help. Rudget (talk) 19:40, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Oh, Rudget :( I'm so sorry to see you go - you're one of our best - Alison 20:43, 10 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of my sysop access.

Thank you. I outlined my reasons at commons:User:Pfctdayelise/Adminship. --pfctdayelise 00:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done with sorrow. --FiliP × 01:05, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of my sysop access. I will be inactive for a long time.

Thank you. Tomatejc 03:12, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Removed both sysop and bureaucrat rights, since I can't think of a reason to keep just the bureaucrat flag. Let me know if this isn't what you want. Regards — Dan | talk 04:25, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
I want both removed. Thanks a lot. Tomatejc 04:36, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
In that case, this is all   Done. — Dan | talk 19:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Drork@he wikipedia

I request removal of sysop access.

Thank you. Broccolitalk page 18:06, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

--M/ 12:04, 8 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of his sysop and bureaucrat access.

Thank you. Nemo 18:52, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done--Nick1915 - all you want 19:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of his sysop access.

Thank you. Nemo 18:52, 7 August 2008 (UTC)   Done--Nick1915 - all you want 20:00, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of his sysop and bureaucrat access.

  • Language Code: lmo
  • Local Confirmation/Request Link: Not active, according to the local policy, which has received a vast consensus (also) here.
  • Local User Page: w:lmo:User:Kemmótar

Thank you. Nemo 18:52, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done--Nick1915 - all you want 20:00, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Innv@ruwikisource, Innv@ruwikiquote, Innv@ruwiki

The following discussion is closed: this is not the place for insults, fights, whatever, we are in talk with, there is no need to keep this open atm. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:13, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

I request removal and block this user on Wikimedia wikis. This user is [[[:w:ru:User:Afinogenoff|Afninogenoff]]]'s (indefblocked vandal & troll) sockpuppet. Please remove all permissions and check this user! See this information - quote anonymous Wikipedia user: "Watch carefully for the community, Andy (AndyVolykhov) and VasilievVV reported that Afinogenoff on Wikipedia, and another heap of projects - a Innv." (russian: Следите внимательнее за сообществом, ВасильВВ и Энди сообщали, что Афиногенов в Википедии и еще куче проектов - это "участница" Innv.). This is serious sockpuppeter (more 28 indefblocked puppet), see Request for Russian Wikipedia Checkusers and old version list of sockpuppeter.

Tnank you, 22:21, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Why do You think this user is "Afninogenoff". Besides has local checkusers. Thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 23:08, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Yes, has local checkusers. Need cross-wiki check this user on more 50 Wikimedia wikis. 23:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
No, first there must be a reason for a check. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 23:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
This is sockpuppet of serious vandal Afinogenoff, see Pauk's quote in LJ: [russian:А разве Таллирдиева фотки публиковала? И тоже УЖЕ не в Википедии.][english:How Tallirdieva photos published? And also not ALREADY in Wikipedia.][comment:Tallidieva is Afinogenoff's indefblocked virtual] - they wrote this on livejournal community ru_wikipedia.
Answer to this post: 1) [AndyVolykhov:1) публиковала; 2) нет, в Википедии, под другим логином.][english:1) published; 2) No, in Wikipedia, under another username.]. 2) [AndyVolykhov:Фотка уже удалена, видимо. А ник сейчас, как писал админ меты на IRC-канале - Innv.][english: Photo has already been removed, apparently. A nick now, as the Meta-sysop wrote to IRC-channel - Innv.][comment:Innv=Tallirdieva=Afinogenoff]. 23:51, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Ok, that is no prove of it. If You continue to replace Innvs pages across wiki I will block Your account Сварог Всевышний, so please stop that (also don't do it with other accounts...). checkusers can comment here tomorrow, they might sleep now. Thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 23:55, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Ok. Thanks. Everything should be done to block all accounts this serious sockpuppeter/vandal. Afinogenoff created a lot of offensive sockpuppet and more provocations. 23:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. As I feared I can't reach anyone at this hour, I will talk to checkusers tomorrow as this is not an emergency right now. I have added Innv to our watchlist, so nothing unexpected can happen. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
There are similarities of style Innv and sockpuppets Afinogenoff:
  • Non-standart signature, with links to discussions, and contribution and anywhere. Please, compare: signature of T-tok, indefblocked virtual of Afinogenoff: t-tok, and Innv: --~Innvs: and Afinogenoff (on listed in the spam list resource, — Afinogenoff §, and Dream (renamed Afinogenoff on spam listed resource): Dream.
  • Abundant use of smile all Afinogenoff's sockpuppets: see user talk T-tok and user talk Innv.
  • See almost two entirely back-phrase: in user talk Innv on Meta-wiki: Всегда пожалуйста! Если что обращайтесь :) and phrase on spam listed resource: Всегда пожалуйста, если что — обращайся.. 00:43, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

I believe there is some error here, as Innv is an admin on Russian Wikisource (their SUL homewiki), and I have found this user to be productive on both Russian and English Wikisource. They are a sysop on many other wikis, notably mediawikiwiki. I suggest that this request be dropped unless someone in good standing puts their name to this request. John Vandenberg 00:41, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes, as I said, checkusers should comment here tomorrow. I have reverted all changes to Innvs pages btw. as this is not only unecessary but also without proove harassment, sorry, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:43, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Innv similar to AstroNomer its activities - he also was productive with the party elected writing articles, but has been blocked for similar reasons - sockpuppetry. 00:46, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Also T-tok participants was very positive, even had received permission "patroller", but it was blocked for sockpuppetry - Afinogenoff was puppeteers. 00:48, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Ok, please enough now, don't make this unreadable. This is all not convincing, we will talk to tomorrow, nothing more to add here, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:50, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Please, note: Trolling on this page began simultaneously with the commencement of work on puppeteers spam-listed resource. 11:01, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

ATTENTION! Next time someone will call anyone else a troll, vandal or will just revert someone's message. he will be blocked. Thanks — vvv 11:20, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

(misinformation deleted, my IP range is used by several people), ~Innvs: 10:59, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Innv blocked for this edit. Seriously, no calling anyone a troll or otherwise here. Kylu 19:14, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: approximately July 11, 2008 Afinogenoff (as Dream on spam-listed resource) wiki-break and Innv also a thing of the Wiki-break. The appearance of activity Afinogenoff on spam-listed resource coincided coincides with an activity Innv on Wikimedia wikis. 09:56, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

ShadeOfGrey@bg Wikipedia

I request removal of my sysop access.

and ack the user on the relevant talk page.
--M/ 08:26, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal of my sysop access.

  • Language Code: meta
  • Local Confirmation/Request Link: *Point to my current edit here on meta making the request for meta access removal*
  • Local User Page: User:KTC
  • I personally no longer require the temporary adminship that I was granted for the purpose of election 2008 related edits.

Thank you. KTC 02:06, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done Kylu 02:07, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Herr Th.@dewiki

I request removal of sysop access due to our inactivity policy.

Thank you. Thogo (talk) 18:08, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done --FiliP × 18:12, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Gabriel BEECHAM@eo vikipedio

The following discussion is closed.

I request removal of sysop access of user.

  • Language Code: eo
  • Local Confirmation/Request Link:

policy say that a person who not does any contribute for full one year, he become un-administrator automaticly - the make un-adminstrator then afterward announce in Diskutejo, and in discution page of the user. (Other type of make un-administrator need discus in Diskutejo, like if misuse (rule 2 of policy), but this type is automatic by the policy rule number 3) This policy is create in February, and remain stable after. User last make contribude in july of 2007 [20]

this is all clear with out controversy if a stevard may understand Esperanto for reading the policy

Thank you. Cacao 13:27, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Did you notify the user, at least as a courtesy?
--M/ 13:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello, and sorry that I do a delay before I reply. Before you write this - no, I confess, I do not tell him, because the policy did suggeest this to happen after. But now, yes, I write in his discution page. I hope that this is good. Thank you. Cacao 17:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

--M/ 12:34, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. Now I go to make an announce in the Diskutejo, to finish all requirement of the policy. Cacao 13:48, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Comment and warning: Cacao quoted the policy out of context. It does use the word "automatic", but earlier it states "at the request of the community". Cacao has been only a part of the community for less than a week, and was a troll while he was there. Certainly he does not speak for the EO:WP community. Yes, Gabriel was inactive, but M7 revoked his admin rights without ever checking with the user or the community, just based upon the word of one person who just created an account mere days ago. Please do better checking in the future. -- Yekrats 10:57, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

I request removal of my sysop and beaurocrat access.

Thank you. Lajsikonik 13:00, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Put this one on hold for awhile please. I wouldn't like to lose a valued sysop/bureaucrat. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 13:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Doesn't look like Lajsikonik can be persuaded... if you wish, please proceed with the removal of access. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 18:10, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
I've also left a message on the user's talk page.
--M/ 18:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


Please remove sysop access of it:Utente:Centrifuga due to failed reconfirmation poll.

Thank you. Brownout(msg) 14:49, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

  Support Yes, I confirm, waiting for another Steward in accordance with our policies. Thank you. --M/ 14:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
  Done --FiliP × 15:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

I request removal of my sysop acces due to not being re-confirmed in this position.

Thanks. -- 11:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done. - Andre Engels 11:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


I request removal sysop access.

Thank you. Wim b 22:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

--M/ 22:10, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (rejected and expired requests only)

Approved, ongoing requests should be moved to Requests for permissions/Approved temporary.

Prince Kassad@ugwiki

I request temporary sysop access (again!). There are many copyvios that need to be deleted.

Thank you. -- Prince Kassad 19:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Sounds fine to me, the pages You found seem to be copyvios, as they have existed before the article created on the wiki. One thing, please could You create a userpage there, so people can contact You if they have ever questions to You about Your actions, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 23:20, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
  Done - Granted until August 23 or if you come here prior to that requesting to remove the bit. --FiliP × 23:29, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm done. -- Prince Kassad 08:51, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Removed it. Thanks for your work! :) —DerHexer (Talk) 08:53, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

.snoopy.@as wikipedia

I request temporary sysop access.

Thank you. .snoopy. 14:59, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done Granted for up to 1 week. Since you want it for a day, just advise here when done so it can be turned off. ++Lar: t/c 05:38, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
  Done thanks --.snoopy. 05:57, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Removed. Thank you for your work. --.anaconda 15:15, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

.snoopy.@ba wikipedia

I request temporary sysop access.

Thank you. .snoopy. 14:59, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Can you provide your user number? I'm getting a "no user" when trying to flip this on for you... (I'll dig for it, but if you know it already...) ++Lar: t/c 05:38, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
This tool [22] suggests that you don't have a usernumber there. In other words that you have not yet logged in, even automatically... Can you do so and get back to us? Or tell me I'm confused (it happens!) Thanks. (note that Special:CentralAuth also suggests you've not visited there yet... but since I went to check on you there, it shows me). I think you just need to view a page there to get sorted. ++Lar: t/c 05:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
  Done soooorry, I visit this link but I haven't log in :( --.snoopy. 05:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
  Done and done... This is one to remember, at FIRST I was going crazy thinking I had to urlencode your user id, or that I had typed it wrong (How hard can it be to type ".snoopy." ?? :) ... but then I can't type my wife's ID, I always have to paste it)... took me a while to guess that yes, maybe you really didn't have an id there, I was disbelieveing the results of the tool :) !!! ... All sorted now, thanks for your patience. ++Lar: t/c 12:29, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

.snoopy.@frp wikipedia

I request temporary sysop access.

Thank you. .snoopy. 14:59, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Can you provide your user number? I'm getting a "no user" when trying to flip this on for you... ++Lar: t/c 05:38, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
As above, please touch a page on this wiki... ++Lar: t/c 05:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
  Done sorry, I visit this link but I don't log in :( --.snoopy. 05:54, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
  Done and done. ++Lar: t/c 12:29, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

Requests for global permissions

Global rollback for Beetstra

I am one of the editors here active on the cross-wiki linkspam front (running multiple wiki link-addition monitoring bots). This flag will help me to quicker revert the more blatant spam on multiple wikis. Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T)

  Comment Highly trusted & competent cross wiki worker. --Herby talk thyme 11:31, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - Yes - very hard working and trustworthy. —Giggy 13:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support (I hope that template won't cause confusion, right?) — vvv 13:34, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support, contributions show cross-wiki spam fighting/reverting vandalism, user is trusted, thanks for helping, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 17:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  Support Per birdy. --Millosh 07:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
  'Support'support per birdy. —DerHexer (Talk) 08:09, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - Yes - Agree with Giggy, global rollback would only be a good thing for this user to be more helpful. Cirt 22:53, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  Support Yes, please. --Thogo (talk) 09:42, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for Giggy

Hello. I have been doing some crosswiki vandal fighting, occassional anti-spam work, and occassional deletion tagging as part of the SWMT and global rollback would make this easier and more productive. Examples of some stuff I've done: [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28]. I have experience with the tool on EnWP (rollbacker) and Commons (admin, crat), I'm also active on some other wikis as detailed on my userpage. Thanks. —Giggy 06:50, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

  •   Comment - Yes - respected and a hard worker across multiple projects, I have no doubts that Giggy will use global rollback appropriately. Cirt 07:50, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Ya — and I'll tap you as needed for id:wp issues; be handy having someone so active and approximately in my timezone to deal with he-who-shall-not-be-named on his next spree. Cheers, Jack Merridew 08:09, 3 August 2008 (UTC).
  •   Comment He has only recently started doing work for this (i.e. most of the work has been done in the past week). Maybe with more time, but I don't think he should be granted it now. Majorly talk 12:24, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Comment I am aware of the dramas that giggy seems to attract :) Equally I do see that he is relatively newly active in a real way in this area so that might be a reason to decline. However I can only say that from my interaction with him regarding Commons both on and off wiki my respect for him has continued to grow. I do not see that it is at all likely he would abuse these rights.--Herby talk thyme 12:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Comment -As mentioned on another request, I don't think new members should get this right, atleast not yet, Giggy has been with the Cross-wiki team for just over 6 weeks which I don't think is enough time to request this right, trust is NOT the issue here...--Cometstyles 13:11, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Comment - I must agree that this is a premature request - Giggy is not a core member of the SWMT (which is not to say that they have not done good work, rather that they have not been doing good work for very long). I would recommend declining this request in favour of continued participation in this area, and another request some weeks or months down the road.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 20:31, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the comments guys, I think I'll withdraw this now and maybe request again at some stage in the future when I've done some more work. Not sure if it's archived anywhere... —Giggy 00:52, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for Nixeagle

The following discussion is closed.

I'm planning on getting into counter vandalism again. I'm already a meta sysop, and I have experience in this task. One of the things that must be done is reverting crosswiki spam before or after we blacklist those links. You will see that I have been active back in April 2008: Spam_blacklist/Log#April_2008, and prior to that Spam_blacklist/LogPre2008#February_2007, for a period of about 3 months. (note that Eagle 101 was my old username). —— nixeagle 17:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

  • I would like to vouch for Nixeagle here. He often does excellent work in a variety of areas, and I believe he'd use this tool well. --Anonymous DissidentTalk 21:08, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
  • I support this, Nixeagle is a trusted user who I believe will contribute positively in this form. MBisanz talk 21:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Normally I'd suggest waiting a while, but Eagle is a well trusted user, and was, at one point the most active user on the spam blacklist pages. He's become more active lately in this area, and I think global rollback will suit him well. Majorly talk 21:44, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Hm, I tend to   Oppose (or better not yet). You did a couple of cross-wiki edits just in the 10 minutes after you put in this candidature here, but that was after 4 months of nothing (and the activity phase in March/April was also not more than two weeks). I would say, let's wait one or two months. --Thogo (talk) 21:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Looking at this, I really don't think she has any cross-wiki experience so as per Thogo, not yet...--Cometstyles 22:38, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
  • I unluckily concurr with Thogo: not yet, quite possibly later. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:43, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Comment Great user and has been really important to BL work however at present I agree with Thogo. --Herby talk thyme 07:43, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Comment Strong xwiki spam fighter, it was Nixeagle's idea that set up the current form of the XWiki spam detection of COIBot (and the linkwatchers). Will certainly use it properly. But indeed, low activity lately (due to other activities). --Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 11:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Alright, then just withdraw the request if the stewards are not wanting to grant it at this point :). —— nixeagle 13:01, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for Erwin

I'd like to able to have global rollback access as I'm active in reverting cross-wiki spam and vandalism. Please note that I've been on holiday lately and haven't made any contributions during that time. --Erwin(85) 10:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Note for stewards
  • SUL is not complete, please chose a wiki (e.g. Metawiki) if You add him to global rollback, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 11:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
  Support, contributions show long time cross-wiki spam removing, thanks for helping, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 11:41, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment, dedicated crosswiki worker. Active & trusted. --Herby talk thyme 11:43, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
  'Support'supportDerHexer (Talk) 11:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment, very active on cross wiki anti spam front. Certainly trusted. --Beetstra public 21:10, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment Trusted user, should have global rollback for reasons mentioned in user's nom. Cirt 22:55, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  Support sure. --Thogo (talk) 09:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
  Yes please  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 20:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for Kylu

I do a bit of cross-wiki work, and this would be handy. I hadn't thought about applying for it until it was suggested in the SWMT channel, but I can see it taking a bit of time off reverting. Thanks either way. :) Kylu 00:02, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

  Support, active (x-wiki experience), helpful, friendly, trusted, thanks for helping, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:34, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment; Kylu is very trustworthy and would do good work. —Giggy 01:10, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  Yes please!  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:10, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  yes, because if she gets this she won't clean up after my messes here any more. that's a yes, son++Lar: t/c 01:12, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Hah! Like SRP's gonna get rid of me THAT easily! Kylu 01:14, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - I'll have to agree with Lar on this ...--Cometstyles 01:38, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
This is a   Support. --Thogo (talk) 10:06, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
active, trusted etc.   Support--Nick1915 - all you want 10:37, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Ah,   Support --M/ 10:38, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  Support and echoing all the above. --FiliP × 08:54, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  No reason to oppose. --Aphaia 21:00, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Of course.   Supportes:Drini 22:32, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - anyone who knows Kylu at all will know just how dedicated she is to cross-wiki counter-vandalism. One of the best :) - Alison 22:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment kylu is an ideal candidate for this flag. Anthøny 19:23, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done --FiliP × 00:16, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for Jorunn

I've been doing some cross-wiki work, reverting vandalism and removing cross wiki linkspam, for the last year, and I think global rollback would be of help for me in that work.

I have a global account, but it doesn't include my main account on my home wiki (nn:user:Jhs). I have myself blocked nn:user:Jorunn to prevent me editing from the account. I have been blocked for a short while on et.wikipedia and for some days on tpi.wiktionary. According to my home wiki is either yi.wiktionary or no.wikipedia, while user:Jorunn has the most edits on en.wikipedia. If you can set a home wiki for the account I would prefer meta. There are some 26 unattached User:Jorunn accounts. They are mine, but they are on closed wikis. Jorunn 01:18, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

  Support, definitly - verrry - about time, thanks a lot for helping, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 01:20, 7 August 2008 (UTC) - P.S. maybe the most active swmt member, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 10:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment I think the tpi.wiktionary block situation is well known to the stewards and shouldn't impede your request. Kylu 01:21, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - The only person that REALLY deserves this right, a very good cross-wiki vandal fighter and the best cross-wiki spam fighter !!!!!! ...--Cometstyles 01:38, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment, as far as I know a very trustworthy user (: --EivindJ 09:33, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  Support. A very helpful user. --Thogo (talk) 10:07, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment absolutely, definitely, unquestionably :) Yes, completely trusted and a very valuable cross wiki worker. --Herby talk thyme 10:10, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  Support sure!--Nick1915 - all you want 10:38, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment - Jorunn is absolutely everywhere. Anyone who's involved in cross-wiki work will have encountered him at some stage. Nobody is more worthy than Jorunn! :) - Alison 10:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
"her" I would think :) best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:48, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  Support oh yeah! es:Drini 22:32, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  Support Jon Harald Søby 18:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  Done--Nick1915 - all you want 11:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for Alison

Hi there. I'm also a member of the Small Wiki Monitoring Team. I'm also checkuser on the English Wikipedia so tend to be involved in cross-wiki vandalism reversion, especially on Celtic-language wikis. Global rollback would be seriously useful in dealing with vandalism - Alison 08:52, 8 August 2008 (UTC) (PS: Link to my interwiki matix here)

  •   Support, Allie is responsible and active in cross-wiki counter-vandalism efforts. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 16:35, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Obviously  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 17:30, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Why? Not as tho Allie ever comes across anything needing reverting anywhere (that is support completely btw!). --Herby talk thyme 17:44, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Support sure--Nick1915 - all you want 17:47, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Comment I don't see a lot of vandal reversions in your cross-wiki edits, perhaps I'm missing them. Could you point me to them please? Thanks. Majorly talk 20:04, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Hi Majorly. They're there all right & I've been doing them for some years now. A lot of them are not self-evident as I tend to revert with comments in the local language. Here is just one example; "Athúsáideadh an leagan deireanach le Guliolopez", and another, and one from Manx WP. Here's a gawikiquote one [29] including one to the main page which lasted over a year![30] (Please dont' ask for a translation!! :) ) I've also had a lot more pre-SUL edits from up to late last year which were done either anonymously or on my old username, User:Ali-oops. Back, pre-sul, I often didn't even bother to log in, partially to prevent my being a target on other wikis. I've plenty more examples but this is just a cursory 5-minute dig - Alison 22:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Support I would say I'm rather concerned that Ally is too overloaded already, we seem to lean on her so much. So I would almost support NOT giving this to her just to try to get her to relax. But if she wants it... of course. Eminently sound candidate. ++Lar: t/c 20:37, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Thank you, Lar :) Bear in mind that I'm going to go do the vandalism reverts anyways - rollback tools or not. This would just mean that I can be quicker & thus be able to take longer breaks :) - Alison 22:17, 8 August 2008 (UTC) (lazy @ heart)
  •   'O wait': I'll try to find a convincing reason why to refuse ... it'll be as easy and short as counting how many angels can dance at a pin head, I'm sure. --Aphaia 20:56, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Comment OK then, I can see you'll be more useful with an addition tool. Majorly talk 22:24, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  • The Drini says yes.   Support es:Drini 22:32, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Comment, to be honnest I can't see much cross-wiki involvement in swmt area, also not with the old account Ali-oops, sorry, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 09:24, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Comment - I'm not sure that Alison is trustworthy enough ;-) —Giggy 10:30, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Support --FiliP × 10:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Comment absolutely. Anthøny 19:30, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  Done--Nick1915 - all you want 12:08, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you so much, everyone. Ok, I have some work to do :) - Alison 19:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for EivindJ

Member of the Small Wiki Monitoring Team, trying to revert all vandalism I come over at small wikis. E.g., [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38]. I haven't been a SWMT member for too long, so if more contributions are necessary before I can request Global rollback, please let me know! Thanks in advance. EivindJ 11:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

  Support, trusted user (sysop nowikt), helpful, friendly, hard working, active helping in swmt, thanks for helping, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:02, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment, former sysop nowiki, interested in many languages and only good experiences with him from nowiki. Laaknor 23:23, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment, I don't think new members of the SWMT would qualify for this, since people who have cross-wiki experience for a very long time should be a priority...--Cometstyles 22:56, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
That's not a reason to deny someone. Majorly talk 23:02, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
I find that highly irritating, I looked at his contributions not when he added some template to his userpage. And his contributions show cross-wiki vandalfighting experience, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 23:14, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment Trusted user and active on smaller projects (and trusted there) as mentioned above, should be useful with global rollback. Cirt 23:00, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  Support Short period of activity is no reason why not. --Thogo (talk) 09:44, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment A user who'd benefit from the tool immensely. Rudget. 13:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
  Support--Nick1915 - all you want 16:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment I think this candidate would benefit from access to the tool. Anthøny 19:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  SupportDerHexer (Talk) 19:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
  Comment User would benefit from the extra tool and prove helpful, agree with above comments by birdy. Cirt 00:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
This one is already   Done by User:Nick1915 [39] - Alison 08:32, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Global rollback for EVula

I spread out over lots of non-English projects (matrix!), and occasionally run across vandalism. I'd like it if I could roll it back in the language of the wiki; I try to keep my use of English to a minimum, and using the localized rollback verbiage would be nice (not to mention easier). For those that are unfamiliar with me, you can find a quick summation of my admin rights at User:EVula#Mini-matrix; I'd say I'm rather trust-worthy, but who knows, maybe I've got ex-girlfriends on here that would argue that point. ;)

I'm also aware that I'm not necessarily hurting by not having global rollback, and that there are others that would perhaps put it to more use than I would; it'd just be a nice supplement to my interwiki editing, and unless there's a maximum number of global rollbackers, I figure it'd be a net-gain. EVula // talk // // 16:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

  •   Comment I don't see much in the way of vandal reversion in your edits. Could you please point me to them? Thanks. Majorly talk 20:07, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
    • Off the top of my head, I can think of one on the Greek Wikiquote[40] that was a couple of days old (I could probably dig up more, but I don't really have time right now to go through 300+ sets of contributions...). But like I said, I'm not as heavy on the anti-vandalism as other candidates here, I just think it would be helpful to have; if nobody else agrees, that's just fine with me. :) EVula // talk // // 20:42, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  • I'd normally vouch for EVula, but for now, Global Rollback seems to be given out to those particularly active in the field, and you don't seem to be. I don't see a point in giving this to you when you haven't really demonstrated much activity in the area. Sorry. --Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:42, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
    • Really, no need to apologize; I'm really not going to get bent out of shape over this. :) EVula // talk // // 15:43, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Comment, I can see that You work cross-wiki, but I can't see involvement in spam/vandalism reversion, sorry, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 09:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Comment,I agree with birdy, building userpages and babel templates does not warrant cross-wiki vandalism reversion..--Cometstyles 13:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
    • Er, I do want to comment on this just a bit. :) The "userpage building" is only so I can consistently present who I am (and, most importantly, that I can't speak the wiki's language), I work on babel templates because they're the most reliably tracked across projects (though I do manage interwikis on plenty of other pages), and I also use the accounts to place free images from Commons.
      Again, I don't mind not getting the rollback bit, and I don't mean to come across as pissed off here, but I do want to clarify what it is that I do cross-wiki; the above summation was a little on the dismissive side. EVula // talk // // 16:00, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Comment Substantial cross wiki work. However, as with the other comments, I see nothing much in the way of reversions that might make this right of value to you & the project. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 16:15, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  •   Comment Although I was thinking of supporting Evula's Global Rollback request, but from what I've seen you seem to be either semi or inactive on most wikimedia sites (e.g Wikiversity, WikiSource, wikiquote) and others, with either a few reverts or none from those sites, despite of this you are a good administrator - but I am concerned about the Global Rollback request at this stage, if you became active on those sites and if we see some more cross-wiki vandalism reversion then maybe I'll give you my support. Dark Mage 18:38, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
  Not done. There's not enough consensus, I'm sorry--Nick1915 - all you want 17:41, 15 August 2008 (UTC)