Meta:Requests for CheckUser information

Requests and proposals Requests for CheckUser information on Meta-Wiki (for other wikis please go to here) Archives (current)→
This page allows you to request CheckUser information on Meta.
  • Please read the CheckUser policy before asking for a check.
  • When adding new requests, please use the {{checkuser}} template to list the user names in question and {{checkip}} for IP adresses, which simplifies investigation.
  • List your request at the bottom of the "Requests for Meta-Wiki only" heading.
  • When asking for a check we need to know:
    • why do you believe that the accounts are related (please present evidence for that with the help of diffs, etc.),
    • why, if the accounts are related, they are being used abusively, in violation of policy; and
    • why a block or other measures can't be justified without the need of technical evidence.
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}:  Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Symbol wait.svg Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale
{{Declined}}: Declined Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}:  It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball
Filing cabinet icon.svg
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day.

Requests for Meta-Wiki onlyEdit

‎Pratap PanditEdit

Pratap Pandit was active on Meta.Wikimedia until 21 June,[1] and he was blocked as a sockpuppet of BabbarJatt on Wikipedia as seen here. This new account Guy Foxx was registered on 7 August and makes same edits as the concerning blocked socks:[2][3]  Aman.kumar.goel (talk) 17:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

@Ajraddatz: Are you available? Aman.kumar.goel (talk) 15:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
  Done, technical results are   Inconclusive. Please note that there is limited CU evidence available for the second account, which could result in a false negative here. Please evaluate based on behavioural evidence. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

See alsoEdit