Hello. I'd like to ask you to please refrain from marking sections as resolved at Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat (as you did here) when you're not an administrator and, specially, in threads concerning you or your behaviour. Thank you for your understanding. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:15, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Accessibility and a warning


First, please change the header here, it's unreadable. Second, stop creating more busy work for people by trying to tag long since locked socks who don't exist locally as you did here. Praxidicae (talk) 16:18, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Praxidicae: What about this page User:Nipponese Dog Calvero? KhanhCN Defender1st Minh (talk) 16:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
leave socks and tagging alone. Full stop. Praxidicae (talk) 17:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
You still have not fixed your userpage and talk page per Accessibility Praxidicae (talk) 14:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Praxidicae: Not fixed?! KhanhCN Defender1st Minh (talk) 14:30, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tham gia nhóm UG


Cho dù bạn bị khóa vẫn hoàn toàn đủ tư cách tham gia nhóm Vietnam Wikimedians User Group vì đây là nhóm độc lập. Alphama (talk) 11:33, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply



Hi your signature is still linking to User talk:KhanhCN Defender1st Minh which does no longer exist since your account has been renamed. Please fix this at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-personal-signature. --Johannnes89 (talk) 06:18, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Fixed! Thanks Johannnes89.  ☀DefenderTienMinh☽  (discussion) 20:39, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nonsense translations


Hi DefenderTienMinh07, please don't react to nonsense translations by blanking the translation page [1][2]. Likewise it's not useful to blank a translation pages if speedy deletion has already been requested [3].

If an existing (and correct) translation was changed, just revert it, if the translation created a new page, ask for speedy deletion (like another user already did there [4]) which will lead to a reset to the previous version [5]. Thanks Johannnes89 (talk) 20:00, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Question about my account "Kazakh1989"


Hi DefenderTienMinh07, I know you're busy and all but some random person named "Elcobbola" blocked my account "Kazakh1989" and I want this account to be unblocked this instant! I tried contacting stewards but no use had come in mind! Isn't there any other way to get my account unblocked from Wikimedia Commons against that "Elcobbola" guy? Thank you! 22:32, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

@ Have you asked him why he blocked your account?  ☀DefenderTienMinh☽  (discussion) 22:47, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Not done @ Sorry I can't handle this for you because you and your account Kazakh1989 has been blocked on this project.  ☀DefenderTienMinh☽  (discussion) 23:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Change my mood


Hi. Sorry to interrupt your concerns but my account "UrduMacho" has been blocked by Elcobbola and I need to know how can I improve on my behavior on Wikimedia Commons? Thank you! 2A0D:5600:D:1001:0:0:0:7C47 23:32, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Not done Obviously you are, who had already been blocked on this project.  ☀DefenderTienMinh☽  (discussion) 23:39, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply



Please use edit summaries only for providing factual explanations of your edits. Even towards blocked/locked users insults such as „idiot“ [6] are unacceptable. Johannnes89 (talk) 06:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Again, please stop attacking users as you did here. You should be providing actual reasons to delete the page, not insults. --Ferien (talk) 15:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
@WikiBayer Could you help me to explain this pls? ☀DefenderTienMinh⛤☯☽ (talk) 15:45, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
For LTAs who keep coming back, this is an acceptable opinion and not an insult. it depends on the context in which the word is used.
In the case mentioned, this is an insult. Here there is no context that justifies it and lets it pass as an opinion. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 16:11, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Template locked/blocked


Hi DefenderTienMinh07, please note (regarding these edits [7][8][9]) that we rarely use {{locked global account}} or {{blocked}} at Meta (see my comment on this user talk page as well: [10]). Please leave it to the stewards/admins to decide if a locked/blocked template should be applied. Johannnes89 (talk) 16:51, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

@DefenderTienMinh07 please stop tagging locked accounts [11] Johannnes89 (talk) 10:40, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Johannnes89 I know, but one thing is, should I use the template {{Locked global account}} for some important cases? The userpage you mentioned belongs to the user who was community banned on viwiki. ☀DefenderTienMinh⛤☯☽ (talk) 15:21, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Please leave it to the stewards/admins who lock/block the account on Meta. If viwiki wants to tag these accounts, they can do so locally. Johannnes89 (talk) 15:40, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Johannnes89 now I got it :> ☀DefenderTienMinh⛤☯☽ (talk) 15:53, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
[12]?? this is by the way even factually wrong, because the account ist just globally locked and not WMF banned. Please just leave tagging (or not tagging) accounts on Meta to admins/sysops/WMF Johannnes89 (talk) 07:09, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

On a page like Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat wrapping the username in the section line will ping the vandal, so please just leave it unlinked. The {{vandal}} does all the necessary linking.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply