User talk:Benjamin Mako Hill
Election committee questionEdit
It would be appreciated if you could take a look at the section of Danny's questions, entitled whistleblower policy. It contains a few negative statements which are not, in fact, questions. The first is a complaint from User:WiseWoman in which the entire content is a rant about women's rights and equality, not a bit about danny's candidacy. The second is a complaint from GerardM demanding the withdrawal of Danny's candidacy, which does not contain a single question or a single inquistitive statement. I have struck the latter, but was reverted and told "I do not have the right" so I am bringing it up here. I believe that having the committee maintain the integrity of the candidate's question sections is critical to ensuring a fair election:While candidates may sling mud at each other, it is entirely unfair for people qualified to give endorsements (i.e. excluding the board) to sling mud at them on their article. The segments in question should be moved to Danny's talk page. Also, I believe some sort of statement at the top of each candidate's question page should be made stating "This page is for actual questions to the candidates, not commentary on their platform"
Copying to the other members of the committee. Thank you for your attention and time.Swatjester 15:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
A great categoryEdit
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Interwiki_conflicts_discussions -- sj | help translate |+ 01:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Redirect for oral citationsEdit
Hello Benjamin Mako. Yesterday, you created the redirect "Oral citations", which redirected to "Oral citations". It was therefore nominated for speedy deletion, but I let it redirect to "Research:Oral Citations" instead. I hope that's okay. Kind regards, Mathonius 12:51, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry. That's definitely what I meant to do. Thanks for cleaning up after me! —mako๛ 22:02, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- Good! It's my pleasure, Mathonius 22:12, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Wikidata for RelationshipsEdit
See Dallan's note for me here :-) –SJ talk 05:49, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Please visit this page if you wish to contribute to a centralized discussion about a Wikimedia genealogy project. Thank you! --Another Believer (talk) 22:06, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Upcoming IdeaLab Events: IEG Proposal ClinicsEdit
Hello, Benjamin Mako Hill! We've added Events to IdeaLab, and you're invited :)
Upcoming events focus on turning ideas into Individual Engagement Grant proposals before the March 31 deadline. Need help or have questions about IEG? Join us at a Hangout:
- Thursday, 13 March 2014, 1600 UTC
- Wednesday, 19 March 2014, 1700 UTC
- Saturday, 29 March 2014, 1700 UTC
Hope to see you there!
This message was delivered automatically to IEG and IdeaLab participants. To unsubscribe from any future IEG reminders, remove your name from this list
Hello, I am interested in the status of WikiCite. Are you involved in this?. Open Research (talk) 13:14, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Canada and United States affiliates meetupEdit
RfC on implementing Flow in the Research namespaceEdit
EpochFail has started a new RfC that may be of interest to you as a Wiki researcher: Meta:Requests_for_comment/Enable_flow_in_the_Research_talk_(203)_namespace. Please consider adding your input! Cheers, Jtmorgan (talk) 18:20, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Did you ever attend Wikimania with your money? Talk to us!Edit
TL;DR: Fill a short Wikimania survey, it takes 5 min.
Hi, I'm writing you because you are listed in Wikimania/Frequent attendees. As you probably know by now, Wikimania 2016 Esino Lario wants to achieve a Wikimania format which allows people to "get things done" and leave the conference fully satisfied with the result of their investment of time and other resources (see pillars 2 and 4: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2016_bids/Esino_Lario/Pillars ). For this purpose, we consider all audiences (see https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2016_bids/Esino_Lario/Program#Target ).
Participants other than scholarship recipients and reimbursed representatives are one group we heard very little from, but we think they are important because: 1) they have financial resources and help make the Wikimania budget sustainable; 2) they have motivation to share and ideas on what makes Wikimania valuable.
We set up a form mainly to collect names of some such people and talk with them later: if you provide your contact, we may write you on this topic. We may release aggregate data from the resposes; data will be handled by us and the Wikimania 2016 fiscal sponsor "Ecomuseo delle Grigne" (under EU law). Please fill the whole form, it's short!
Feel free to forward this invite to anyone.
Federico Leva and Martin Rulsch
Wikimania 2016 team, scholarships subteam
08:30, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Authorship and entropyEdit
User:Rich Farmbrough/Jagged 85/Herbalism is an example page. The entropy page isn't added at this stage.
Rich Farmbrough 15:54 24 June 2016 (GMT).
Presenting Community Engagement Insights survey report: Tuesday, October 10, 1600 UTCEdit
Hi Benjamin Mako Hill,
I am reaching out to you because you signed up to receive updates about the Global Wikimedia survey.
We will be hosting a public event online to present the data, a few examples on how teams will be using it for annual planning, and what are next steps for this project. The event will take place on Tuesday, October 10, at 9:00 am PST (1600 UTC), and the presentation will be in English. You can watch the livestream here, and ask question via IRC on #wikimedia-office.
If you are unable attend, you can also find the report on meta, and watch the recording of the event at a later time.
We hope to have you join us online! -- María Cruz 23:29, 2 October 2017 (UTC)