Strategi/Wikimediabevægelsen/2018-20/Arbejdsgrupper/Partnerskaber

Overblik

Anbefalinger

Implementering

Rapporter

OSS

Overblik

Nøgleord

Collaboration, Big Open, GLAM, Open Science, Education, Revenue Streams

Fokus

Fokus

• muligheder og udfordringer i forhold til opbygning af partnerskaber på det lokale, regionale og globale plan;
• strategiske fremgangsmåder til eskalering af det arbejde vi udfører på måder ud over vores egen kapacitet og rækkevidde;
• samarbejde med andre organisationer og bevægelser for at fremme vores vision og værdier;
• og flytte i vores strategiske retning med muligheder for bredere indvirkning.

Rationale

Our vision statement says nothing about Wikimedia being the only entity that brings us closer to our vision. Partnerships are happening on global, regional and local basis, and some of our successes would not have been possible without the critical support from our partners. Partners are crucial to increase our scope, outreach, and impact, and can also be funding partners. Partnerships can also help us focus on our specific field of expertise and avoid duplicating structures in the broader open movement beyond ourselves.

Organizations and groups are lacking the necessary resources and capacities to fully tap into the benefits of working together with others in local, regional and global partnerships. Movement entities also have different approaches to deciding whom to partner with, and how to ensure alignment between our goals and the goals of partners.

There are no established practices of how to best share responsibilities with partners from within and outside of our movement, and how to communicate about partnerships and share experiences. There are no clear means for agreeing to and executing partnerships at a global level. Most of our movement and the majority of our projects were designed around individual contributors, and our technologies and practices do not easily accommodate collaboration or contributions from institutions.

We want to become the essential infrastructure of the ecosystem of free knowledge. How do we then build the capacities to successfully work together with our ecosystem and create the needed impact to collectively change the world, especially in those regions where we are still lacking sustainable partnerships?

Vejledende spørgsmål

These questions are not meant to be answered one-to-one but should help the group frame their own conversations and their consultations with movement stakeholders.

• How do we build our collaborative capacity to be the best and most effective partner?
• What are the specific areas where we need partners to advance in our strategic direction?
• What are the partners we want to work with, and how do we ensure alignment in our goals?
• How do we best share global, local and thematic responsibilities with entities inside and beyond our movement?
• What structural, including technical, changes might we need to make to be more partner-friendly?

Postliste

wg2030-partnershipswikimedia.org

Medlemmer

Navn	Organisation / projekt	Rolle	Geografi
Abhinav Srivastava	Wikimedia India	Frivillig	Sydasien
Alek Tarkowski	Creative Commons, Centrum Cyfrowe Foundation	Frivillig	Central og østeuropa
Andrea Patricia Kleiman	Wikimedia Argentina. Muj(lh)eres latinoamericanas en Wikimedia. Wikimedia Uruguay. Wikimedia España.	Frivillig	Latinamerika
Ben Vershbow	Wikimedia Foundation	Ansat	Northern America, Western Europe, Central and Eastern Europe
Jack Rabah	Wikimedia Foundation	Ansat	Vestasien, Nordamerika
John Cummings	UNESCO	Frivillig	Vesteuropa
Olaniyan Olushola	Affiliations Committee	Frivillig	Vestafrika
Lisa Lewin	Wikimedia Foundation	Bestyrelsesmedlem	Nordafrika
Shani Evenstein	Wikipedia & Education User Group; WikiProject Medicine User Group; WMIL; GLAMWiki; WikiWomen	Frivillig	Vestasien
Stuart Prior	Wikimedia UK	Ansat	Vesteuropa

Reports and documents

Anbefalinger

Please take a look at the draft recommendations (September 2019):

1. Provide the knowledge needed for understanding and solving global issues
2. Wikimedia as steward of the Free Knowledge Ecosystem
3. Shared ecosystem of services and tools for content partnerships
4. Data partnerships approach to fulfill the vision of knowledge as a service for our partners
5. Focus on knowledge equity when determining priorities for Partnerships
6. Partnerships as part of a Distributed Vision
7. Partnerships as a shared and equitable resource and activity
8. Prioritise documentation
9. Invest in sharing knowledge about partnerships across the movement
10. Support the skills development of people working on partnerships
11. Invest in the leadership potential of community members
12. Establish recognition principles for new partners for attribution and content donation
13. Additional research for areas where we have identified issues but haven’t made recommendations

First draft recommendations are available as well (August 2019).

There is also an abbreviated, translated version prepared for easier engagement.

Scoping document

• Omfangsdokument (marts 2019)

Aktiviteter og rapporter

• Meeting summaries

Wikimedia Conference Working Group Report (2018)

This is an overview of the outputs from the discussion about Partnerships at the Wikimedia Conference 2018. The group discussed 1. What the scope of this thematic area should be, 2. Who should be in the Working Group, 3. How the Working Group should work.

Samtalens fokus

One of the core messages from the discussion group was that partnerships on different levels and in different cultures (geographical, organisational, etc.) will have different structures and practices. Given the scope of the movement, the implementation of multi-layered partnership structures might be one of the biggest challenges in the work of the Working Group and the Strategy Process in general.

Hvad?	Hvem?	Hvordan?
Shared understanding of reasons for partnering and flexible [enough] system of decision making that enables creating partnerships/collaboration/alliances by different actors and on different levels. How to build a structure for partnerships in the movement? What is the difference between collaboration vs partnership vs coalition? Which segments are appropriate to participate? What is the difference between internal and external partnerships? How much control do we need to have in a given partnership?	There should be a good balance of people representing The Wikimedia community and other social movements current and future partner organisations; people with experience in creating partnership guidelines for movements/networks; people with expertise in different dimensions of partnership processes (legal, financial, technological, etc) people who work with knowledge (GLAM institutions, universities); people who represent different cultures.	The group tried to come up with a realistic plan for a one year process, which can include: Reviewing and editing existing partnership philosophy/principles Mapping existing and potential partners Conducting series of interviews with diverse stakeholders and build on their experience and knowledge about partnerships.

Hvis du kunne tænke dig at lære mere om denne arbejdsgruppes beslutninger om dette tema, så tag da endelig gerne et kig på dokumentationen.

Ressourcer

Eksisterende materialer

This is a non-exhaustive list. Please add more sources that provide context, background information and insights related to the thematic area.

• Phase I – Cycle 2: Engaging in the Knowledge Ecosystem
• Partnerships and Resource Development on Meta
• Partnerships Group Statement
• WMF partnerships reflections
• Considering 2030: Future of reference and open knowledge
• State of Creative Commons
• ...