Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Working Groups/Partnerships
The group has prepared a set of draft recommendations. Skip to the section with a list of the draft recommendations.
Collaboration, Big Open, GLAM, Open Science, Education, Revenue Streams
- opportunities and challenges related to building partnerships at the local, regional and global levels;
- strategic approaches to scaling the work that we do in ways beyond our own capacity and reach;
- collaboration with other organizations and movements to promote our vision and values;
- and move in our strategic direction with opportunities for wider impact.
Our vision statement says nothing about Wikimedia being the only entity that brings us closer to our vision. Partnerships are happening on global, regional and local basis, and some of our successes would not have been possible without the critical support from our partners. Partners are crucial to increase our scope, outreach, and impact, and can also be funding partners. Partnerships can also help us focus on our specific field of expertise and avoid duplicating structures in the broader open movement beyond ourselves.
Organizations and groups are lacking the necessary resources and capacities to fully tap into the benefits of working together with others in local, regional and global partnerships. Movement entities also have different approaches to deciding whom to partner with, and how to ensure alignment between our goals and the goals of partners.
There are no established practices of how to best share responsibilities with partners from within and outside of our movement, and how to communicate about partnerships and share experiences. There are no clear means for agreeing to and executing partnerships at a global level. Most of our movement and the majority of our projects were designed around individual contributors, and our technologies and practices do not easily accommodate collaboration or contributions from institutions.
We want to become the essential infrastructure of the ecosystem of free knowledge. How do we then build the capacities to successfully work together with our ecosystem and create the needed impact to collectively change the world, especially in those regions where we are still lacking sustainable partnerships?
These questions are not meant to be answered one-to-one but should help the group frame their own conversations and their consultations with movement stakeholders.
- How do we build our collaborative capacity to be the best and most effective partner?
- What are the specific areas where we need partners to advance in our strategic direction?
- What are the partners we want to work with, and how do we ensure alignment in our goals?
- How do we best share global, local and thematic responsibilities with entities inside and beyond our movement?
- What structural, including technical, changes might we need to make to be more partner-friendly?
|Name||Organization / project||Role||Geography|
|Abhinav Srivastava||Wikimedia India||Volunteer||South Asia|
|Alek Tarkowski||Creative Commons, Centrum Cyfrowe Foundation||Volunteer||Central and Eastern Europe|
|Andrea Patricia Kleiman||Wikimedia Argentina. Muj(lh)eres latinoamericanas en Wikimedia. Wikimedia Uruguay. Wikimedia España.||Volunteer||Latin America|
|Ben Vershbow||Wikimedia Foundation||Staff member||Northern America, Western Europe, Central and Eastern Europe|
|Jack Rabah||Wikimedia Foundation||Staff member||West Asia, Northern America|
|John Cummings||UNESCO||Volunteer||Western Europe|
|Olaniyan Olushola||Affiliations Committee||Volunteer||West Africa|
|Lisa Lewin||Wikimedia Foundation||Board member||North America|
|Shani Evenstein||Wikipedia & Education User Group; WikiProject Medicine User Group; WMIL; GLAMWiki; WikiWomen||Volunteer||Western Asia|
|Stuart Prior||Wikimedia UK||Staff member||Western Europe|
Reports and documents
Please take a look at the draft ecommendations (August 2019):
*Note: some of the recommendations are not based on full consensus of all the members of the working group yet. We are looking forward to discussing the nuances of these at Wikimania.
“How might we build Wikimedia into an effective convener of impactful partnerships, coalitions, and collective action based on a shared vision of free Open Knowledge Movement, such as the “Big Open” framework? What should be the purpose of such partnerships?”
Summary of recommendations
“How do we develop technical infrastructure, capacities and the support we need in order to be an effective partner to share ‘the sum of all knowledge” and fulfill the vision of knowledge as a service for our partners?”
“How can we empower people and organizations working on partnerships within our Movement to get the support they need to fulfill our potential and carry out diverse, sustainable, effective and impactful partnerships?”
“How do we create an inclusive, movement-wide culture of sharing knowledge, skills, and practices on collaborations and partnerships - so that everyone in the movement can participate in and benefit from them?”
There is also an abbreviated, translated version prepared for easier engagement.
- Scoping document (March 2019)
Activities and reports
Wikimedia Conference Working Group Report (2018)
This is an overview of the outputs from the discussion about Partnerships at the Wikimedia Conference 2018. The group discussed 1. What the scope of this thematic area should be, 2. Who should be in the Working Group, 3. How the Working Group should work.
- Focus of the conversation
One of the core messages from the discussion group was that partnerships on different levels and in different cultures (geographical, organisational, etc.) will have different structures and practices. Given the scope of the movement, the implementation of multi-layered partnership structures might be one of the biggest challenges in the work of the Working Group and the Strategy Process in general.
Shared understanding of reasons for partnering and flexible [enough] system of decision making that enables creating partnerships/collaboration/alliances by different actors and on different levels.
There should be a good balance of people representing
The group tried to come up with a realistic plan for a one year process, which can include:
If you would like to know more details about the Working Group discussions on this theme, please consult the documentation.
This is a non-exhaustive list. Please add more sources that provide context, background information and insights related to the thematic area.