< Stewards‎ | confirm‎ | 2010
English: The 2010 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
Suomi: Vuoden 2010 ylivalvojien vaalit on loppu. Uusia ääniä ei hyväksytä enää.
العربية: انتخابات المضيفين لعام 2010 انتهت. لا أصوات أخرى سيتم قبولها.
Deutsch: Die Stewardwahlen 2010 sind beendet. Weitere Stimmen können nicht mehr berücksichtigt werden.
Español : Las elecciones a Steward del año 2010 han concluído. No se aceptan más votos.
فارسی: .رای‌گیری در مورد انتخابات ویکیبدهای جدید پایان یافته است.رای‌های جدید مورد قبول واقع نخواهد شد.
Français : Les élections de 2010 pour Steward se sont conclues. Aucun vote au-delà de cette date ne sera compté.
Gaeilge: Tá na toghcháin Maoir 2010 dúnta anois. Ní féidir aon vótaí eile a glacadh as an am seo amach.
Galego: Xa remataron as eleccións a steward do ano 2010. Non se aceptarán máis votos.
Alemannisch : D Stewardwahle 2010 sin umme. Du chasch nimmi abstimme.
עברית: בחירות הדיילים לשנת 2010 הסתיימו. הצבעות נוספות לא תתקבלנה.
Magyar: A választás lezárult, további szavazatokat nem fogadunk el.
Italiano: Le elezioni del 2010 a Steward sono terminate. Nessun voto ricevuto dopo questa data sarà preso in considerazione.
日本語: 2010年のスチュワード選挙は終わりました。今後の投票は受け付けられません。
Nederlands: De stewardsverkiezingen van 2010 zijn gesloten. U kunt niet meer stemmen.
Polski: Wybory stewardów w 2010 roku zakończyły się. Nowe głosy nie będą akceptowane.
Português : As eleições para Steward de 2010 estão encerradas. Nenhum voto lançado a partir desta data será computado.
Русский: Выборы стюардов — 2010 завершены. Дальнейшие голоса не будут приняты.
Svenska: 2010 års val av stewarder är avslutat. Ingen ytterligare röstning kommer att accepteras.
中文: 2010年监管员选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文(简体): 2010年监管員选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文(繁體): 2010年監管員選舉已經結束。逾期投票將會作廢。
Ελληνικά: Οι εκλογές επιτρόπων για το 2010 έχουν τελειώσει. Δεν γίνονται δεκτές άλλες ψήφοι.
Türkçe: 2010 kâhya seçimleri tamamlanmıştır. Daha fazla oy kabul edilmeyecektir.
Azərbaycanca: 2010 eşikağası seçkiləri tamamlanmışdır. Daha çox səs qəbul olunmaz.


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

  • Languages: fr, en
  • Personal info: Personal info: Hi ! Although my steward related activities have been very light in the last year, I am still interested in keeping steward access. I'm currently struggling to start professional activities, so my involvement in steward stuff has been limited. But I'm still motivated and involved through the chapter in particular. I'll be happy to keep those access, but I would also fully understand (but regret :)) if removed due to my limited activity.
  • 言語: fr, en
  • 候補者の情報: 対象者より: こんにちは。昨年はごく僅かしかスチュワードとして活動できませんでしたが、スチュワード権限を維持したいと思っています。専門研究の立ち上げに手を取られ、スチュワードとしてはごく限られた活動しかできていません。しかし、活動への熱意は(支部活動が中心ではありますが)変わりません。活動量が少な過ぎて解任され得ることは重々(残念ながら :))承知していますが、続投させて頂ければ幸いです。
  • Языки: fr, en
  • Личная информация: Персональная информация: Привет ! Хотя моя деятельность в качестве стюарда были весьма небольшой в прошлом году, я по-прежнему заинтересована в сохранении стюардского доступа. Я в настоящее время занята для того, чтобы начать профессиональную деятельность, так что моё участие в роли стюарда носит ограниченный характер. Но я все ещё имею мотивацию, хоть и частичную. Я буду счастлива сохранить свои права доступа, но я также хорошо пойму (но, к сожалению :)) если их удалят из-за моей ограниченной деятельности.

Comments about AnthereEdit

  • basically inactive, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 01:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • True that Anthere is inactive but (as with Angela, who decided to resign making the point moot) I think there is merit in having the benefit of her expertise available to Stewards. Reconfirm. ++Lar: t/c 01:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • I disagree with Lar here... Angela's decision was the right one.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • I count two steward actions within the last year. If this is true, I respectfully move to remove as inactive per policy, though she's still quite a valued Wikimedian. The foundation is encouraged to add Anthere to an internally-run group (such as Staff) if an exception is warranted. If there are more than ten actions (and I may well be missing some, such as deletion review) please let me know so I can modify this opinion. Kylu 02:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Unfortunately, inactive. Pmlineditor  07:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Inactive. --WizardOfOz talk 10:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Remove, sorry, but only 2 steward actions after last confirmation. —Innv {ru-ws} 10:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Inactive. Doesn't need the tools -> remove. -Barras talk 11:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Hardly any activity, so I'm afraid I must say remove. I do agree with Lar about benefiting from your expertise, but I think you simply are too inactive. (Especially if Kylu's right about the two steward actions.) --Erwin 14:07, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
    Perhaps we need a "steward emeritus" role, folk who left without controversy/in good standing, and who can still stay on the mailing list so we can benefit from their insight and advice, but who no longer have the bit itself? ++Lar: t/c 14:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
    I like that idea. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 14:48, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
    Me too. I'd like to add that Angela and Anthere were only active in the earliest days and their memory and experience is valuable. --Aphaia 12:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • inactive - so adios! We have too little active Stewarts but so much users think beacuase of Stewards like you we have enough. Marcus Cyron 17:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • she told she wants to be active but she couldn't find anything to do , anyway i would be happy to see you as a active steward but till then i have to say remove --Mardetanha talk 17:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Basically inactive. Rights are granted for the benefit of the community, when they ceased to be used to any degree they can be removed --Herby talk thyme 09:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • totally inactive, remove (sadly) --FiliP ██ 11:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Neutral. Obelix 11:45, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • spectacular person who has given a lot to the foundation and its projects (and likely will continue to do so). However, it appears that she doesn't really need the tools and I would tend to say it is better to remove them for now. James (T C) 23:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Inactive, remove. Razorflame 07:16, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep - Waerth 16:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC) - After everything Anthere has done this is the way she gets treated? Everyone should be ashamed of themselves![]
  • Keep, I'm sure we can find work for her. bastique demandez! 23:28, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • keep - my view in general is that keeping onboard trustworthy people who have for some time been less active but are willing to continue using steward tools even when used very sparingly, will eventually lead to a greater evolutionary diversity in the stewards group. such diversity is essential, not only of talents or knowledge, but also variety of experience and number of years of service. with all respect, we don't want a uniform group of hyperactives solely, nor is there need of an overthrow of some sort of government, there is none here, since stewards do not rule. so let's keep such experience onboard where we can. in my philosophy, extended-rights communities should always be kept growing on a healthy wiki. please stay onboard by being/becoming sufficiently active (see current policy which sets the limits, but can use some updating as well imo). the case of anthere is special as well, and i know from experience how energy and time-consuming wmf board-work is, and that one really needs time to recover and pick up old and new routines and work again. oscar 00:43, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • keep - turstworthy enough -- ※   JéRRy   ┼   雨雨   ※  16:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • if outside life is the priority, make it so, revel in that, the requirement of stewardship is to have a requisite level of activity to meet the needs of the community. The only person who can tell us whether that is capable of being fulfilled is the steward. If you think that what you do matters, and meets the requirement, then you have my support to continue. billinghurst sDrewth 13:31, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep -FASTILY (TALK) 22:03, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Keep. She wants to keep being steward. This is good enough reason for me :) --Millosh 13:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Keep, per Bastique (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 02:29, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Well, any choice will be okay ultimately :-) Perhaps I need to explain why I wish to keep steward access. Some months ago, when I decided not to run again for elections, it was also out of true exhaustion. I needed a break and a very serious one. I feel much better now. But I also need to run like crazy to get again my own life in a working condition (well, such as earning money) and that's a tough one. I kept a few activities in wikimedia related world because I still want to help. But to be fair, that's less than I wish I would do. Last time I went on Commons, I was completely lost within the new rules for deletion and I ran away after a dozen deletions because I was told three times in a row that I should do it this way, not that way, but specifically like this and not like that. I felt completely out of it. A few times, I came to the steward page and felt similarly paralyzed and out of fear of just not doing it the *right* way, I decided to not do anything. I honestly wonder if other oldbies do not feel the same :))) I feel a bit stretched between the idea that I should just do as Angela and completely drop the whole idea of helping in that area (and that would possibly be more reasonable ?), but having the fear that when (if) I want to help again in that area, I will just not be able to do it, and I *know* that I will be too lazy to go again through the entire process to be reelected. It feels like "giving up". To be fair, perhaps the best comment above is the one from Bastique: "Keep, I'm sure we can find work for her." Yeah, what can I be useful for ? Meanwhile... all my thanks to ALL active stewards that help things working properly. Anthere
    But, Anthere, when you say A few times, I came to the steward page and felt similarly paralyzed and out of fear of just not doing it the *right* way, I decided to not do anything., why didn't you simply ask if something was unclear? You really don't need to be ashamed for asking other stewards if you don't know what to do or how. ;o) We are there to help, you know. :) And actually, if you do something wrong, it can always be undone, explained and fixed. We are not on Commons, you won't get shouted on if you don't do things the "right way" after a longer break. ;) --თოგო (D) 00:34, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[]
    Believe it or not... I am easily "not bold". Back in 2001... it took me a full month before daring to do my first edit :) Anthere
    Anthere, we don't need you for the stray bit flip or rename or global account lock or what have you. We need you for your experience, going way back, so that when we float new ideas on the mailing list you can say "we tried that in 2006 and here's what happened", and when we try to figure out thorny problems, or review policy implications, you can share your expertise with us. That's far more important than bit flipping. IMHO anyway. ++Lar: t/c 16:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Fair enough, and for your question, that was exactly what I felt when I was back to meta from my several month long wikibreak, and that was mainly why I didn't ask for granting the permission I had lost during my break (it had been just few days ago I came back, lol) ... so   stay here, I sure bet you find yourself again quite comfortable and familiar in months or even in weeks, just I'm feeling so again. --Aphaia 02:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Per Millosh. Kropotkine 113 08:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Per Anthere's explanation. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 01:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Will Beback 09:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Looks okay.--Caspian blue 05:30, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Keep trustworthy user, her experience is a valuable asset we should not refuse. Lechatjaune 10:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  •   Remove Sorry, inactive. Thanks for your hard work, but I think it's time to move on. Majorly talk 22:12, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  •   Remove. Inactive. SM ** =^^= ** 21:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep--Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 23:38, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Two actions are more than one, and I'm not sure I find inactivity to be a very good reason for removal anyways. Anthere can clearly be trusted as a Steward. I don't see how the various projects benefit from a removal in this case. JoshuaZ 02:03, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  •   Remove – per Kylu and Lar. Too inactive. --Geitost diskusjon 03:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Confirm Institutional memory serves, and past history of exemplary service. Thank you for continuing. NonvocalScream 00:57, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep I agree with Joshua. If Anthere wants to remain a steward, that's good enough for me. Sarah 04:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Inactive. Prodego talk 06:17, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Keep. Anthere has always provided a level head around the project, and I'd like her to be a steward for that reason alone. SlimVirgin (talk) 13:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • I'm afraid you will be still inactive, since you write statment you didn't make any steward action. LeinaD (t) 16:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep. Jayjg 19:56, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • I felt comfortable this year with every single member of the team. This is true, regardless of the mere count of actions and the amount of interactions on wiki, mailing list, IRC, social networks or real life. Therefore I'd feel much more comfy if all current stewards are confirmed. --M/ 23:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[]