< Stewards‎ | confirm‎ | 2010
English: The 2010 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
Suomi: Vuoden 2010 ylivalvojien vaalit on loppu. Uusia ääniä ei hyväksytä enää.
العربية: انتخابات المضيفين لعام 2010 انتهت. لا أصوات أخرى سيتم قبولها.
Deutsch: Die Stewardwahlen 2010 sind beendet. Weitere Stimmen können nicht mehr berücksichtigt werden.
Español : Las elecciones a Steward del año 2010 han concluído. No se aceptan más votos.
فارسی: .رای‌گیری در مورد انتخابات ویکیبدهای جدید پایان یافته است.رای‌های جدید مورد قبول واقع نخواهد شد.
Français : Les élections de 2010 pour Steward se sont conclues. Aucun vote au-delà de cette date ne sera compté.
Gaeilge: Tá na toghcháin Maoir 2010 dúnta anois. Ní féidir aon vótaí eile a glacadh as an am seo amach.
Galego: Xa remataron as eleccións a steward do ano 2010. Non se aceptarán máis votos.
Alemannisch : D Stewardwahle 2010 sin umme. Du chasch nimmi abstimme.
עברית: בחירות הדיילים לשנת 2010 הסתיימו. הצבעות נוספות לא תתקבלנה.
Magyar: A választás lezárult, további szavazatokat nem fogadunk el.
Italiano: Le elezioni del 2010 a Steward sono terminate. Nessun voto ricevuto dopo questa data sarà preso in considerazione.
日本語: 2010年のスチュワード選挙は終わりました。今後の投票は受け付けられません。
Nederlands: De stewardsverkiezingen van 2010 zijn gesloten. U kunt niet meer stemmen.
Polski: Wybory stewardów w 2010 roku zakończyły się. Nowe głosy nie będą akceptowane.
Português : As eleições para Steward de 2010 estão encerradas. Nenhum voto lançado a partir desta data será computado.
Русский: Выборы стюардов — 2010 завершены. Дальнейшие голоса не будут приняты.
Svenska: 2010 års val av stewarder är avslutat. Ingen ytterligare röstning kommer att accepteras.
中文: 2010年监管员选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文(简体): 2010年监管員选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文(繁體): 2010年監管員選舉已經結束。逾期投票將會作廢。
Ελληνικά: Οι εκλογές επιτρόπων για το 2010 έχουν τελειώσει. Δεν γίνονται δεκτές άλλες ψήφοι.
Türkçe: 2010 kâhya seçimleri tamamlanmıştır. Daha fazla oy kabul edilmeyecektir.
Azərbaycanca: 2010 eşikağası seçkiləri tamamlanmışdır. Daha çox səs qəbul olunmaz.


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

  • Sprachen: pt, es-2, en-2, gl-2
  • Informationen zur Person: Steward seit der letzten Wahl; ich bearbeite die Anfragen auf SRP. Ich hoffe, dass ich den Wikiprojekten in diesem Jahr mehr helfen kann. Danke.
  • Languages: pt, es-2, en-2, gl-2
  • Personal info: Steward since last election, I work with the requests on SRP. I hope can help the wikiprojects more this year. Thanks.
  • Idiomas: pt, es-2, en-2, gl-2
  • Información personal: Soy steward desde la última elección, trabajo con solicitudes en SRP. Espero poder ayudar a los proyectos wikis más este año. Gracias.
  • Langues: pt, es-2, en-2, gl-2
  • Renseignements personnels: Steward depuis la dernière élection, je travaille sur les demandes à SRP. J'espère que je pourrais assister les wikiprojects encore cette année. Merci.
  • שפות: pt, es-2, en-2, gl-2
  • מידע אישי: אני דייל מאז הבחירות האחרונה ואני עובד עם בקשות על אישורים. אני מקווה יכול לעזור יותר בשנה הבאה. תודה.
  • 言語: pt, es-2, en-2, gl-2
  • 候補者の情報: 昨年の選挙でスチュワードに選任頂き、主に SRP の依頼を扱っています。今年は一層ウィキ・プロジェクト群に貢献したいと思います。有難うございます。
  • Línguas: pt, es-2, en-2, gl-2
  • Informações pessoais: Steward desde a última eleição, trabalho com os pedidos em SRP. Espero poder ajudar os wikiprojetos mais este ano. Obrigado.
  • Языки: pt, es-2, en-2, gl-2
  • Личная информация: Стюард после последних выборов, я работаю с запросами на SRP. Я надеюсь помочь википроектам в этом году больше. Спасибо.
  • Γλώσσες: pt, es-2, en-2, gl-2
  • Προσωπικές πληροφορίες: Είμαι steward από τις τελευταίες εκλογές, δουλεύω με τις αιτήσεις στο SRP. Ελπίζω να μπορέσω να βοηθήσω τα εγχειρήματα περισσότερο αυτόν τον χρόνο. Ευχαριστώ.

Comments about AlexanderpsEdit

  • Inactive... Maybe not inactive, but what Laaknor said is... concerning. Pmlineditor  07:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Inactive. User should be removed as a steward. Tiptoety talk 08:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Inactive. --WizardOfOz talk 10:30, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Inactive. Doesn't need the tools -> remove. -Barras talk 11:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Confirm, though I would like to see more activity. --Erwin 14:09, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
    Remove per Laaknor. --Erwin 13:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Basically inactive and doesn't demonstrate any need for the tools. According to this section of the village pump, on pt.wikinews checks were done by Alexanderps routinely on editors without a serious motive to do so (including a bot account). User should be removed as a steward. Ruy Pugliesi 14:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • inactive - so adios! Marcus Cyron 17:29, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • sadly inactive but if he prefers to go on his job as steward then yes please but otherwise remove --Mardetanha talk 17:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Inactivity, can't reconfirm this user as steward. Finn Rindahl 01:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Keep, per Erwin. Obelix 02:20, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Keep, per Erwin. Not so inactive.--Jusjih 03:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Of the 99 rightchanges he has done, 30 are in his home wiki/native language where he according to the steward-policy shouln't change rights, and the local community has said that they do not trust him (because of this?!), and the rest of his steward-work is mostly "easy" stuff like SRP. Because of this, I have to say remove Laaknor 08:43, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Basically inactive. Rights are granted for the benefit of the community, when they ceased to be used to any degree they can be removed --Herby talk thyme 09:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • not completely inactive (there was activity in December and before that), but Laaknor's concern is somewhat valid. neutral so far --FiliP ██ 11:32, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Sorry, if you're not around helping us then it isn't helpful for you to have the tools.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 14:16, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Per Laaknor and others, sorry you aren't very active and don't seem to have an interest in becoming active. That coupled with the loss of support from your community makes me worry. James (T C) 23:28, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Inactive, remove. Razorflame 07:15, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • keep - my view in general is that keeping onboard trustworthy people who have for some time been less active but are willing to continue using steward tools even when used very sparingly, will eventually lead to a greater evolutionary diversity in the stewards group. such diversity is essential, not only of talents or knowledge, but also variety of experience and number of years of service. with all respect, we don't want a uniform group of hyperactives solely, nor is there need of an overthrow of some sort of government, there is none here, since stewards do not rule. so let's keep such experience onboard where we can. in my philosophy, extended-rights communities should always be kept growing on a healthy wiki. please stay onboard by being/becoming sufficiently active (see current policy which sets the limits, but can use some updating as well imo). oscar 00:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Not because of this, Laaknor. The community doesn't trust him anymore cause the checkuser tools were used without a valid reason. He says here that any recently created accounts were being checked, with no reason, with no use of summary. The ombudsman commission was comunicated about the fact. According to "CheckUser policy" the tool should removed immediately. It was not done, wich is a shame for this project. I have to say that I'm sure this user has good faith and it wasn't done for his own benefit.Teles (talk / pt-wiki talk) 02:06, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Hard to fathom why. The role is mop and bucket extraordinaire. If you want to use them, then please do so, if not, then move on. It seems to be a simple decision, but not one where your intentions are stated, just a small smattering of words. Yes if there is going to be output, no if you intend to repeat 2009 billinghurst sDrewth 12:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • confirm. Xqt 21:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Inactive. Remove, unfortunately. -FASTILY (TALK) 22:02, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Keep. Even small but regular involvement is helpful to other stewards. --Millosh 13:12, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • I've not been around the whole year to know, but logs suggest inactivity, so no need for the tools. --Egmontaℨ 08:55, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Remove rights because of preventive checkuser of new users at pt-wikinews (see link above). The Ombudsman committee was approached with this, but since ombudsmen are supposed to deal only with the Privacy policy (which was not violated) and not the Checkuser Policy ("There must be a valid reason to check a user."), I forwarded the case to the WMF. But I stated my opinion clearly that a checkuser must not perform checks without a valid reason, and that reason must be justified by the behaviour of the user to be checkusered. The fact that there is a persistent troll out there is not sufficient to checkuser random newly registered accounts, some of them without any edits on that wiki, others regular editors in good standing on other projects. --Tinz 18:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • remove Concerns about overuse of checkuser are severe and have not been addressed. JoshuaZ 03:40, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Remove because of inactivity. --FollowTheMedia 23:56, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Remove per the lack of activeness. --Caspian blue 16:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Remove regarding the statement of Tinz above. --Stepro 03:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Inactive, remove --Church of emacs talk · contrib 12:23, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep, per Erwin too. Mwaldeck msg 02:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep--Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 23:37, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Remove. Due to inactivity. Thank you for your service. NonvocalScream 00:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Inactive. Prodego talk 06:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Oppose because inactive. SlimVirgin (talk) 13:12, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  •   Remove because of lack of trust (and per Teles, Tinz, Laaknor) --Geitost diskusjon 15:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • Sorry, I'm not trust you. Self-granting oversight right on home wiki doesn't look good. LeinaD (t) 16:34, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[]
  • No any activity after creating of statement (log info) and unstabil checkuser actions in pt-wikinews → remove. —Innv {ru-ws} 09:53, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
  • I felt comfortable this year with every single member of the team. This is true, regardless of the mere count of actions and the amount of interactions on wiki, mailing list, IRC, social networks or real life. Therefore I'd feel much more comfy if all current stewards are confirmed. --M/ 23:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[]