Meta:Requests for adminship/Tegel

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Tegel

Ending 12 September 16:54 UTC

Tegel (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

Hello fellows, today I am nominating Tegel for adminship on Meta. He is actively working on Meta for around 7 months. He is mainly active in spam and vandalism fighting jobs which you can see by taking a look over his contributions (also see his deleted contributions which is a lot). He often asks for quick blocks to administrators. With sysop bit he can take care of these things all by himself. As a global rollbacker, he is also active in global vandalism fighting tasks, therefor really experienced in these matters. He is already eligible for adminship on Meta as he holds the sysop and bureaucrat rights on Swedish Wikipedia. I believe Tegel is another perfect choice for adminship here. Hope you all will agree with me too. — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 16:54, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I accept the nomination. -- Tegel _(Talk) 16:55, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support per above. — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 16:54, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Mathonius 16:57, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Barras 16:58, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support sure, per Tanvir. –BruTe ^talk 17:10, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Finn Rindahl 17:17, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 17:23, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I like Tegel airport. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:32, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of course. Good candidate. Trijnstel 17:35, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, no problems here. Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:53, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Striker ^talk 18:00, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Der Hex. –SJ talk | translate 18:58, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per DerHexer :D --WizardOfOz ^talk 21:09, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support the more the merrier :) a×p_de ^Hello! 07:24, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Grunny (talk) 09:20, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bara du inte försvinner från svwp nu :) -- Lavallen 10:26, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, por supuesto. Sa vh ^ñ 13:23, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 13:25, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Per Barras. Jafeluv 15:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alex Pereira ^falaê 18:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure, why not? Theo10011 18:42, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:15, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Agreed. ” T_ele^s (T _{@ L C S}) 22:56, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Matanya 04:59, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --თოგო ^(D) 11:13, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? --^Email Vaibhav ^Talk 12:16, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite active (unlike admins like me :() Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:33, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Sokac121 19:44, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, why not - Hoo man (talk) 20:19, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I trust both nominator and nominee --FalconL ^?! 15:31, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Courcelles 02:09, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lucas Nunes 15:45, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jca raballo 21:56, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sì --M/ 10:08, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --N KOzi^Talk 10:12, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Srikant Kedia 10:21, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Successful -Barras 17:01, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]