Преглед на администраторската дейност

This page is a translated version of the page Admin activity review and the translation is 33% complete.
Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Bahasa Melayu • ‎Basa Banyumasan • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Jawa • ‎Lëtzebuergesch • ‎Nederlands • ‎Nordfriisk • ‎Sunda • ‎Tiếng Việt • ‎Türkçe • ‎asturianu • ‎azərbaycanca • ‎català • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎føroyskt • ‎italiano • ‎kurdî • ‎norsk • ‎oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎română • ‎suomi • ‎svenska • ‎čeština • ‎Ελληνικά • ‎български • ‎русский • ‎тоҷикӣ • ‎українська • ‎ייִדיש • ‎עברית • ‎ئۇيغۇرچە • ‎العربية • ‎فارسی • ‎मराठी • ‎हिन्दी • ‎বাংলা • ‎ਪੰਜਾਬੀ • ‎தமிழ் • ‎മലയാളം • ‎ไทย • ‎中文 • ‎日本語 • ‎粵語 • ‎한국어

В заявка за коментари от април-юни 2013 г., за администраторите и други носители на разширени права бе решено да се определи максимално време на бездействие, без преглед на дейността от общността, от две години.


Проведен от стюарди преглед на дейността на бюрократи и администратори във всички уикита (засягащ едновременно редактирането и административните действия) показа, че има значителен брой бюрократи и администратори:

  • които никога не са използвали техните права;
  • които може да са използвали правата си в миналото, но вече не са активни в уикито, в което имат такива права

Освен това, поглед назад върху "искания на стюарди за промяна на потребителски имена", показа, че в някои уикита тези искания са останали неизпълнени от местните бюрократи, или изпълнени едва след изключително дълго време.


  1. Максималният период на неактивност без преглед от страна на общността за притежателите на разширени административни права трябва да е две години.
    За по-голяма яснота, притежателите на разширени административни права в този документ се определят като
  2. Inactivity for this case is defined as zero edits and zero administrative actions on the wiki where the rights are maintained.
  3. Stewards will undertake a regular audit of the activity levels of advanced permissions holders.
    The audit will either be an annual or semi-annual process, according to the decisions of each current set of stewards.
    This review process will examine all public wikis. However, wikis where stewards will not perform notifications nor removal actions include:
    • wikis with an active Arbitration Committee, e.g. English Wikipedia, as such projects can decide about their inactivity removals;
    • wikis with currently active review processes, such as Commons Wiki;
    • special wikis designated by the Wikimedia Foundation, including private wikis, fishbowl wikis and wikis operated by Wikimedia chapters.
  4. The following outlines the procedure for contacting inactive rights holders, the expected response from these rights holders on their respective wikis, and the process for removal of rights.
    On wikis where no formal advanced rights review process exists locally, the stewards or their delegates will:
    1. notify those advanced rights holders who have exceeded the maximum allowed time period for inactivity. Such a notification (notice of maximum inactivity) will be sent as a message to the user's talk page on the wiki where they hold their respective rights.
    2. The notified users should then post information to the local community about the notice of maximum inactivity they received from the stewards in order to discuss the matter. If the community then decides to manage these inactive advanced administrative rights holders on their own, they should contact the stewards at the stewards' noticeboard, where the messaged user could provide evidence to the stewards about the local community's decision.
    3. If the stewards do not receive a suitable reply as outlined above after approximately one month, they will evaluate the responses and decide whether to refer the management decisions back to the local communities for comment and review, or to remove the advanced administrative rights from the inactive user. The aim of this process is ultimately to leave each decision to local communities if there are any, which will be upheld and supported by the stewards.

Nota bene

  1. Some WMF communities already have processes to review holders of advanced administrative rights. Examples of such processes currently in use are:
    • minimum activity levels by number of edits or administrative actions;
    • maximum inactivity by time period;
    • a recall process;
    • a confirmation process.
  2. Most of these wikis with such processes also use an approximately twelve-month time period as part of the processes for reviewing activity levels of advanced administrative rights holders.
  3. This policy does not override the authority of any currently existing review processes of any communities, including any such more restrictive systems currently used by the communities. For example, stewards are currently confirmed on an annual basis by the global Wikimedia Foundation community; whereas checkusers and oversighters are currently subject to a higher standard of inactivity policies.