User talk:Teles/Archive/2016

Negruzjaimes

(creo que sabes español pero te hablo en inglés). Hi Lucas. I see you've blocked globally to negruzjaimes. This user is this user and sockpuppets if you do a global lock (LTA). But I do not know if necessary. Answer me on es.wikipedia. See you later. -San- 23:50, 23 January 2016 (UTC).

Lo sé, así hacemos en esa wikipedia, por ejemplo: el administrador Taichi también hace algunas de esas listas. Saludos. -San- 00:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC).

@~Expresses life: Perdóname pero no estoy de acuerdo con ustedes. Como he dicho, están reproduciendo los insultos, y ayudando a aquello que estamos bloqueando.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 00:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Ya ha sido borrada la lista de todas formas, gracias por el aviso, hay que usar el sentido común :/ -San- 00:21, 24 January 2016 (UTC).

@~Expresses life: Creo que puedes mantener los nombres que no son insultantes. Pero es algo que ustedes tienen que decidir con otros usuarios de su wiki. Gracias por considerar mi opinión.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 01:05, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

De nada. Está bien recibir opinión de otros usuarios. Nos estamos viendo. Un saludo. -San- 02:02, 24 January 2016 (UTC).

Should FuzzyBot remove all potentially outdated translations?

Hello, thanks for adding multiple new translations in your language here at Meta-Wiki in recent years. Please join the discussion with your opinion: Should FuzzyBot automatically remove all potentially outdated translations?. Nemo (talk) 12:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Confirmation discussions

Dear Teles,

As you probably know, the confirmation discussions for Stewards have been closed. In order to determine the outcome of these discussions, you are invited to comment on Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2016 before scheduled closure of the confirmation section "one week after the appointment of the newly elected stewards" (Sunday 6th of March, 17:22 UTC), though the closing time might be extended at the ElectCom's discretion for an extra week if it is believed "further input is required before concluding". All stewards are welcome to comment, including those newly elected.

For those who ran for confirmation, consider revising comments regarding you, and replying to those where appropriate. Savh^ñ 08:01, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

RfC notice: Designated space for editors to give and seek advice about topic bans and other sanctions

You are being contacted because you commented on the proposal for a designated space in which users, including topic-banned and other sanctioned users, could ask questions and seek information about topic bans and other sanctions, "IdeaLab/Area for topic banned editors to talk freely about their ban, e.g. to ask questions of experienced wikipedians." There is now an RfC in progress concerning this proposal. Your participation is welcome. Darkfrog24 (talk) 03:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Change to project you endorsed

Hi, Teles, thank you for your endorsement to the Edit-a-thon on Neuroscience and Mathematics. I am one of the organizers, and I am writing to communicate a slight change in the budget. This change has not affected the overall budget and is basically due to buying more snack itens than what we had initially expected to buy. I am glad to answer any question you might have on this change. --Joalpe (talk) 13:51, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Notice of review of adminship

Hello Teles. In accordance with Meta:Administrators/Removal and because you have made fewer than ten logged administrator actions over the past six months, your adminship is under review at Meta:Administrators/Removal/October 2016. If you would like to retain your adminship, please sign there before October 18, 2016. Kind regards, MF-W 01:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Announcing a new mailing list for Meta-Wiki administrators

Hello!

As a regular administrator on Meta-Wiki, you're allowed to subscribe to the recently created metawiki-admins mailing list. This is a closed mailing list for announcements, asking for help and discussion between Meta-Wiki administrators. If you wish to subscribe, please fill the form at this page and then contact Savh or MarcoAurelio via Special:EmailUser using your administrator account so they can verify the authenticity of your request and address. You'll find more information on the mailing list description page. Should you have any doubts or questions, feel free to contact any of us. We hope that this tool is useful for all.

Best regards,
-- MarcoAurelio and Savh 12:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Mailing list administrators for metawiki-admins mailing list.

Message sent to members of Meta:Administrators/Mass-message list. Please see there to subscribe or unsubscribe from further mass messages directed to the whole group of administrators.

Grants Friendly space expectations

Thank you for your participation in grants discussions.

However, your comments on are off-topic and have been hidden according to the Friendly space expectations.

We would suggest rephrasing your comment to be more constructive and productive.

Contributors to the Meta-wiki Grants namespace are expected to follow the Friendly space expectations at all times. These expectations are needed to ensure a pleasant environment for focused discussions where contributors engage respectfully.

When you feel you can provide comments that are more on-topic, we welcome your participation in the discussion.

Questions? Contact friendlyspace(at)wikimedia.org.

I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 17:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

@I JethroBT (WMF): Hi. Regardless of my tone, please pay attention to what is being said on that request. Others and me are seeing something we consider to be wrong and it is our role to bring that up. If I didn't bring it in the best way in your opinion, at least bear in mind some important things that were raised there. Are you open to discuss them in a polite conversation?
I assure you that I had reasons to react that way. That didn't come out of nowhere. Obviously, that is not going to be raised by Padula as it affects his work. However, it is clear to me that a part of what is being presented on reports are not what is really being done and it is hard to describe it with the best wording. Assume that what I brought can be true. Isn't it relevant to the discusion a correct evaluation of the reports? Did you see the unanswered questions raised by Joalpe?—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 20:02, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

cs.wiktionary

Hi, can you please answer my question posed on your cs.wikt Talk page? Thank you. --Auvajs (talk) 23:42, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi again, Teles, can you please answer the second question posed there too? Tnx. --Auvajs (talk) 18:45, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

@Auvajs: Hi! Sorry, but I can't answer that. Those requests are considered private and, for that, I am not allowed to publish who requested it here or anywhere publicly.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 22:19, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

No renaming between November 20 and November 27

Hi,

You’re getting this because you’re a steward or global renamer. The Community Tech team are working on cross-wiki watchlists. We need to add a couple of fields to the localuser table in centralauth database. In order to be able to do this, we’d need to run a script that will get in the way of renaming users. Our apologies – we realize this is getting in the way of your work.

We ask that you do not rename anyone between 00:00 November 20 (UTC) and 00:00 November 27 (UTC).

(UTC means that if you live in the Americas, it will be on the evening or afternoon of November 19 when the script starts running, and if you live in Oceania or eastern Asia, it can be closer midday on November 27 before we can be sure the script is no longer running.)

Phabricator task.

If there are any problems related to this, or you have any questions, please write me on my talk page. /Johan (WMF) (talk) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)