2600:1702:38D0:E70:FD25:732E:F177:1A07
Do you want to be blocked completely, or how should I interpret your recent contributions? -- Tegel (Talk) 17:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- i mean i got blocked from editing templates 2600:1702:38D0:E70:FD25:732E:F177:1A07 17:34, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, and it can be extended if you continue to mess around. -- Tegel (Talk) 17:36, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Unblock request declined
This blocked user has had their unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request. Request reason: But I didn't edit the wiki in like 2 months! 2600:1702:38D0:E70:FD25:732E:F177:1A07 19:28, 2 August 2019 (UTC) Decline reason: No good reason given to unblock. Vermont (talk) 15:54, 8 August 2019 (UTC) বাংলা | English | español | français | magyar | italiano | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | українська | 中文 | edit |
|
|
Unblock request declined
This blocked user has had their unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request. Request reason: My edits are constructive, i was editing only templates though 2600:1702:38D0:E70:FD25:732E:F177:1A07 11:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC) Decline reason: Spamming us with unblock requests within your range is only going to lead to a longer block. — xaosflux Talk 14:25, 11 September 2019 (UTC) বাংলা | English | español | français | magyar | italiano | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | українська | 中文 | edit |
}}
Comment I believe that the community does not believe that the edits are constructive, whether they are templates or not. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:59, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note, has been spamming unlock requests (since deleted) - is within rangeblock Special:Contributions/2600:1702:38D0:E70:0:0:0:0/64. — xaosflux Talk 14:23, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Unblock request declined
This blocked user has had their unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request. Request reason: I really apologize. My templates were constructive Decline reason: No reason given. বাংলা | English | español | français | magyar | italiano | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | українська | 中文 | edit |
2600:1702:38D0:E70:FD25:732E:F177:1A07 00:22, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Could you reply to my question on User talk:2600:1702:38D0:E70:616A:838:8591:E38E? -- Tegel (Talk) 07:44, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Your templates were not considered constructive by the community. I suggest that your editing from an IP address is problematic as communication is too difficult with troublesome editing. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:50, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Unblock request declined
This blocked user has had their unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request. Request reason: I didn't do anything wrong cross-wiki! Decline reason: No reason given. বাংলা | English | español | français | magyar | italiano | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | українська | 中文 | edit |
2600:1702:38D0:E70:FD25:732E:F177:1A07 11:33, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 |
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. |