Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/elections 2010/votes/SETI3

< Stewards | elections 2010 | votes
Warning
English: The 2010 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
Suomi: Vuoden 2010 ylivalvojien vaalit on loppu. Uusia ääniä ei hyväksytä enää.
العربية: انتخابات المضيفين لعام 2010 انتهت. لا أصوات أخرى سيتم قبولها.
Deutsch: Die Stewardwahlen 2010 sind beendet. Weitere Stimmen können nicht mehr berücksichtigt werden.
Español : Las elecciones a Steward del año 2010 han concluído. No se aceptan más votos.
فارسی: .رای‌گیری در مورد انتخابات ویکیبدهای جدید پایان یافته است.رای‌های جدید مورد قبول واقع نخواهد شد.
Français : Les élections de 2010 pour Steward se sont conclues. Aucun vote au-delà de cette date ne sera compté.
Gaeilge: Tá na toghcháin Maoir 2010 dúnta anois. Ní féidir aon vótaí eile a glacadh as an am seo amach.
Galego: Xa remataron as eleccións a steward do ano 2010. Non se aceptarán máis votos.
Alemannisch : D Stewardwahle 2010 sin umme. Du chasch nimmi abstimme.
עברית: בחירות הדיילים לשנת 2010 הסתיימו. הצבעות נוספות לא תתקבלנה.
Magyar: A választás lezárult, további szavazatokat nem fogadunk el.
Italiano: Le elezioni del 2010 a Steward sono terminate. Nessun voto ricevuto dopo questa data sarà preso in considerazione.
日本語： 2010年のスチュワード選挙は終わりました。今後の投票は受け付けられません。
Nederlands: De stewardsverkiezingen van 2010 zijn gesloten. U kunt niet meer stemmen.
Polski: Wybory stewardów w 2010 roku zakończyły się. Nowe głosy nie będą akceptowane.
Português : As eleições para Steward de 2010 estão encerradas. Nenhum voto lançado a partir desta data será computado.
Русский: Выборы стюардов — 2010 завершены. Дальнейшие голоса не будут приняты.
Svenska: 2010 års val av stewarder är avslutat. Ingen ytterligare röstning kommer att accepteras.
中文： 2010年监管员选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文（简体）： 2010年监管員选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文（繁體）: 2010年監管員選舉已經結束。逾期投票將會作廢。
Ελληνικά: Οι εκλογές επιτρόπων για το 2010 έχουν τελειώσει. Δεν γίνονται δεκτές άλλες ψήφοι.
Türkçe: 2010 kâhya seçimleri tamamlanmıştır. Daha fazla oy kabul edilmeyecektir.
Azərbaycanca: 2010 eşikağası seçkiləri tamamlanmışdır. Daha çox səs qəbul olunmaz.

SETI3

edit

SETI3 talk · contribs · SULutil / stalktoy · globalcontribs · crosswiki-ness · confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
Deutsch:
Ελληνικά:
español:
  • Idiomas: en-4, fr-4, ru-4, pl-N
  • Información personal: Hola, este es SETI3, estoy activo principalmente en la Wikipedia en inglés.
suomi:
français:
עברית:
Bahasa Indonesia:
  • Bahasa yang dikuasai: en-4, fr-4, ru-4, pl-N
  • Informasi pribadi: tuliskan pernyataan Anda di sini
日本語:
русский:

Questions: See Stewards/elections 2010/Questions#SETI3

  Yes

edit
  1. Good language skills and not part of the sysop/steward cliche which is exactly what's needed.--Xania 01:31, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Szalakóta 20:25, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Hardenacke 09:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Culture & big experience on Polish Wikipedia. Paterm 00:20, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. No cross-wiki participation, sorry, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:07, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Not enough experience. –Ejs-80 00:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I doubt the candidate is interested in this election anyway after reading their statement plus I doubt they have enough experience. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Experience issues. Katerenka (d) 00:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Taichi - (あ！) 00:30, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. There is not enough experience. -Barras talk 00:30, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Obelix 00:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Mr.Z-man 01:07, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. -FASTILY (TALK) 01:10, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  10. RP459 01:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  11. —§ stay (sic)! 02:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Nope.  fetchcomms☛ 04:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you're ineligible--Nick1915 - all you want 13:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. -MBK004 05:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  13. He even didn't answered the questions! --MisterWiki 05:29, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Nope. Pmlineditor ∞ 06:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Vyk 10:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Galandil 10:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --WizardOfOz talk 10:09, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Treublatt 10:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Per above. cassius1213 10:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  19. to be active in en:WP is not a cause to be a steward. Marcus Cyron 11:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  20. sorry, per Cyron --Egmontaz♤ talk 12:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Mainly active and 150 edits, no, we don't need such "activity" — NickK 12:17, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Not enough experience. --Erwin 12:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Not a sysop in any of the Wikimedia wikis. -- Tofra Talk contributions 12:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Blanket 'NO' votes for all candidates as a form of protest against open balloting. Riffic 13:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  25. did not answer the questions, no real statement --MF-W 14:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Not enough experience, no flags, no statement...and no support from me. 1ForTheMoney 17:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  27. A Stop at Willoughby 19:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Doesn't seem interested in this election (no real statement, no answer to the questions). Not enough experience as a contributor or in cross wiki actions, and not a sysop. VonTasha 19:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  29. I agree with spacebirdy.--Alex Esp 21:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --თოგო (D) 01:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Lucas Nunes 01:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Miyagawa 09:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Not sysop on any WMF-wikis. Laaknor 09:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --junafani 10:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Not much crosswiki activity. --FiliP ██ 11:21, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  36. I'm not sure you really understand what stewards are about. And you don't have the sort of experience that's relevant for the job.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 14:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Fruggo 15:19, 8 February 2010 (UTC) I'm not sure you understand what a steward is.[reply]
  38. not on this occasion, no evidence provided of requisite skill set billinghurst sDrewth 02:16, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Per Julian. Razorflame 07:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  40. oppose - oscar 21:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Per birdy --FollowTheMedia 22:51, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Wesha 01:36, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Not enough experience. --Tryptofish 21:35, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Lacks experience as a sysop and lacks exposure to small wikis. John Vandenberg 22:50, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  45. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 23:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Juwena 11:23 12 February 2010 (UTC)
    You are not eligible to vote. Merdis 10:11, 14 February 2010 (UTC) [reply]
  46. no answers & no statement Comte0 01:36, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  47.   NO Kenrick95 05:18, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  48. No flag. ...Aurora... 13:08, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Stepro 04:53, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Per above.--Sulmues 16:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  51. didn´t answer questions in about a month's time --Trexpro 13:06, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  52. LeinaD (t) 19:33, 27 February 2010 (UTC) No, no, no... "I am mainly active on the English Wikipedia" (162 edits!) + inactive on home wiki (pl.wiki)[reply]
  53. Prodego talk 00:56, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  54. See above. --Geitost diskusjon 17:30, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    ru-4 he said? I do not know such guy. Incnis Mrsi 00:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]
    I am sorry but the vote ended at 11:59 on the 28th and to be fair I must remove this vote. If desired it is here for the board however. James (T C) 01:05, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. Please express your policy and answer our questions. Octahedron80 03:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Agree. I don't see Mr. SET13 here, only a code.Botteville 19:50, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2010/votes/SETI3&oldid=5738752"