Meta:Requests for interface adminship/Putnik

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Putnik

Putnik (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.

Not ending before 10 November 2020 17:12 (UTC)

I am currently working on improving the Events calendar, and in particular, I would like to move related scripts to gadgets "namespace". Since the changes (including localization) will take some time, then I think that interface administrator flag is the best option for this.

At the moment, I already have an interface administrator flag in several projects, as well as experience in editing scripts and gadgets. — putnik 17:12, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Hi Putnik, do you already have 2FA? Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker ^(CA) 17:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- They should have as there are int-admin in commons and ru. The closing crat should be able to verify this if needed or can verify with some other steward/crat who can.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I have 2FA enabled. — putnik 18:12, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support: high level of both professionalism and social skills. Carn (talk) 18:09, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I am perhaps not understandig you well, and if so please accept my apologies in advance. You mentioned above that you would like to move related scripts to the Gadgets namespace. Do you mean the Gadget/Gadget_definition namespace?. I ask because nobody is able to edit those namespaces (i.e. no local group has the gadget-edit/gadget-definition-edit permissions) and as far as I remember from a chat with Krinkle, this is intentional as those NS shouldn't be used (yet). Do you mean instead the regular MediaWiki namespace? Thanks, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I was referring to the MediaWiki: namespace (or more specifically MediaWiki:Gadget-*), and I didn't think it might be ambiguous. — putnik 19:33, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Experienced and trustful, plus a clear use case. Meiræ 21:09, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support LGTM, per Meiræ --DannyS712 (talk) 00:39, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 10:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SupportCamouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I'd prefer to have seen many edit-requests for a non-admin asking for this, but due to experience on other projects I'm at least slightly supportive - do caution that adding default gadgets should not be done without a community discussion and using this access for other non-opt-in areas should only be done with extreme care. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support enough experience, no concerns. ミラP@Miraclepine 05:34, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -FASTILY 09:41, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:55, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above request page is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Comments about this page should be made in Meta:Babel or Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.