Meta:Requests for adminship/Laaknor

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Laaknor edit

Laaknor (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

For some reason I tend to spend a lot of time on this wiki. Someone keeps spamming #wikimedia-stewards with xxx changed groups on xxx from (none) to autopatrolled, and since I already spend so much time here, I could probably help with that patrolling stuff, that I don't have access to on this wiki as a steward. Blocking vandals, editing protected pages and stuff I technically have access to, but it would be nice to have the metacommunitys permission to use it :). I think I know the most important policies, so that shouldn't be a problem... Laaknor 01:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cbrown1023 talk 03:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Don't see any reason why not, and since you are a steward there is obviously no issue with trusting you to use the tools properly. Ajraddatz (Talk) 03:18, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Knowledge of policies appears to be intact. :) sonia 05:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aphaia 08:22, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, of course. Jafeluv 08:44, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. PeterSymonds 09:13, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, please. --Mercy 09:15, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - trusted. -Barras 09:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely - should be part of any (active) stewards tools. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:34, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --M/ 10:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support a nobrainer! billinghurst sDrewth 10:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support sure --Nick1915 -^{all you want} 10:54, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --თოგო ^(D) 11:22, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course. JenVan (talk) 12:54, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trusted. Also, in my opinion, all stewards should become a meta admin automatically. Pmlineditor ∞ 13:50, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If I recall correctly and didn't misunderstand, it was our custom to think stewards meta b'crats and admins automatically. I have no idea when we abolished this custom ... --Aphaia 10:52, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Probably when global user rights became avalaible. Our global steward group gives us access to most of the admin/crat tools globally. --dferg ^{☎ talk} 13:36, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Maximillion Pegasus 16:08, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WizardOfOz ^talk 16:18, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:20, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course Mardetanha ^talk 23:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Please. –BruTe ^talk 13:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| 18:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --dferg ^{☎ talk} 11:18, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support convincingly argued --Jan eissfeldt 23:03, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Trusted. Tiptoety ^talk 01:53, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Hoo man (talk) 11:18, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. You know the most important policy, so why not? --Erwin 12:03, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
support —DerHexer (Talk) 12:26, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Tanvir • 13:08, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support micki t 15:45, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support oh yes --FiliP ██ 17:14, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Closed as successful thus meta has a new sysop Mardetanha ^talk 02:16, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]