Meta:Requests for adminship/Aude

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Aude

Aude (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

Discussion to end at or after 01:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC).

Requirements

Be an administrator, bureaucrat, or checkuser on a local Wikipedia or related project. Admin on English Wikipedia, since 2006; Admin on Wikimedia Commons since 2007.
Have a user page on Meta, with links to the user pages on other participated projects. Have both a wikimatrix and a SUL unified account.
Have a valid contact address. You can contact me via Special:Emailuser/Aude
Currently an active contributor on Meta. Yes, I'm especially active editing Wikimania pages, Wikimedia DC (future) and NYC chapters pages, also helped out with the 2010 fundraiser, often "stalk" Special:Recentchanges here to see what's new, and do whatever else I can to be helpful.
Language boxes I'm a native English speaker, but also know intermediate-advanced Arabic and some Spanish. Languages are noted on my user page.

I am interesting in becoming an admin on Meta-Wiki, in order to be useful with whatever tasks I see need to be done. That way I can just do them rather than try to hunt down another admin or just post on the Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat. I'm happy to keep an eye on that requests page when I can.

In 2004, I joined English Wikipedia, became an admin there in 2006 and on Wikimedia Commons in 2007. I'm also an admin and have helped out on Outreach and Ten Wiki. I had temporary adminship on Meta-Wiki during the recent fundraiser to help out with those pages. As well, I edit some on Arabic Wikipedia and increasingly will do so as my language skills have improved a lot, doing maintenance and cleanup.

I hope that in my time here, I have gained your trust that I won't abuse the tools, will use good judgment, and be generally helpful around Meta-Wiki. Cheers. Aude 01:03, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cbrown1023 talk 01:13, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lucas Nunes 02:27, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Needs the tools, trusted, uses a Wikimatrix. Sure. Kylu 02:30, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:12, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure. fetchcomms☛ 05:13, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
sure, why not --თოგო ^(D) 10:29, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, fine by me. -Barras 10:31, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, why not? - Hoo man (talk) 13:25, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per kylu. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure. Theo10011 18:27, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Grunny (talk) 07:39, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course. PeterSymonds 08:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support —DerHexer (Talk) 13:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Sure. Ajraddatz (Talk) 15:25, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Charming, intelligent, thoughtful, patient, listens well, helpful, kind, caring, aware, clear-headed, able, willful, etc. etc. etc. Ottava Rima (talk) 18:07, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Maximillion Pegasus 20:28, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WizardOfOz ^talk 19:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
full support --Jan eissfeldt 19:23, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 09:40, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support –BruTe ^talk 13:49, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rock drum (talk·contribs) 20:56, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mercy 10:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 11:02, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clear consensus to promote. vvv^t 01:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]