Help decide our official logo from the designs created by the Wikimedia community by:
- Supporting a specific design by adding your name and signature to the support section of a design.
- Commenting on the logos.
- Adding your own designs to the competition using the same format as the logos below (until the 6th of November).
- 28 October - 6 November – New entries accepted
- 28 October - 11 November – Community input
The final decision will be made by Connected Open Heritage staff based on the votes and comments made by the community.
- It's a nice design, but it's a little bit too close to UNESCO's logo for me. I realise it's a fairly generic shape, but UNESCO's logo is probably quite recognisable to people working in the heritage sector. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 14:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- My favorite so far, everything is in it : the ⌘ knot which works both for Heritage (even if it's more common in the nordic countries, but there is no universal symbol anyways) and Connected and a reminder of Wikidata (which is a connerstone tool). Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 15:04, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- Cristian Cenci (WMI) (talk)
- Sign name here
- a little political and rough, but the concept is strong
- I really like the idea behind the design and I think it links back to the ideas behind Connected Open Heritage. But it's not immediately clear what the outline is and I had to look at the file description before I realised that it is one of the Buddhas of Bamiyan. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 12:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- Interresting but I'm not really sure I understand the idea (and the outline is unrecognizable). Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 14:55, 8 November 2016 (UTC)