Community Wishlist Survey 2021/Notifications/Real-Time notification

Real-Time notification

  • Problem: Notifications are not Real-Time if encase of surprise block after users save the edit, however this need to be refresh the page to seen notification.
  • Who would benefit: Contributors
  • Proposed solution: while Contributors are editing may receive an notification without refreshing an page, this helpful for slow internet connection and while reading.
  • More comments:
  • Phabricator tickets:
  • Proposer: Farpen (talk) 03:55, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion

  • Hi Farpen. I have some questions about your proposal. You mention blocks in your "problem" statement. Is that an example of how you came up with this idea? Would your wish be for "real-time" notifications that don't require a page refresh even if those notifications are not about blocks? What other kinds of notifications would be helpful as "real-time" notifications? --AEzell (WMF) (talk) 23:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
    • If user was blocked from editing, a "you have a new message" will appear without refreshing, but if user tried to save an edit then an blocked text will appear. Other kind of notification like alerts from "your edit was reverted", "your edit has thanked" and "article reviewed". It maybe useful for any kind of notification like "alerts" and "notices". "Real-Time" notification are not required to refresh an page, those user was blocked without warning may not received an notification and may see a block notice. -Farpen (talk) 02:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Voting

  •   Support --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 20:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I often receive talk page vandalism white reading something. I see it after it's already reverted by someone else. Stryn (talk) 20:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support وهذم مشكلة أعاني منها شخصيًا Nehaoua (talk) 21:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Barcelona (talk) 22:51, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support YFdyh000 (talk) 23:07, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support real time is better to not waste your time while changes you are unaware of have happened Leftowiki (talk) 00:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support NMaia (talk) 03:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Opalzukor (talk) 08:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Samwalton9 (talk) 09:49, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support ‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--6PO (talk) 14:49, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Rafael (stanglavine) msg 18:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Supportputnik 19:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support dwf² (talk) 23:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I can already imagine my additional mobile data charges. H78c67c (talk) 01:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support SunDawn (talk) 03:31, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support 14:22, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   I don't think so. Enjoyer of World (talk) 06:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support BoldLuis (talk) 18:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support That would be great Xnet1234 (talk) 22:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Proposal needed for people who have access to low-speed Internet and can receive notifications in real time. WikiFer msg 17:59, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Useless. If someone is blocked, they'll find out soon enough. We have no need to add features for the benefit of problem users.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  07:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I think it should be an option you can change. Positron832 (talk) 17:05, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Dey.sandip (talk) 15:58, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support S8321414 (talk) 14:33, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Nachtbold (talk) 17:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)