Abstract Wikipedia/Wikifunctions logo concept/Proposal 24

WikifunctionsLogoProposalByAlexanderTanchoco20210223Variation4.svg
  • The inspiration for this logo is the commonly used function call notation of the parentheses (denoted in blue).
  • The red hub and spokes inside the parentheses symbolizes the function parameter which graphically represents WF (wiki functions) blended together, and also denotes the complex nature of what a function may do, as well as it looks like a dancing, joyful human figure.
  • The inner side of the left and right parentheses forms part of the circle. The vertical green "parentheses" completes the circle and symbolically denotes a recursive call.
  • Both sets of parentheses highlights the circle which denotes the globe, that unites all of humanity on this planet.

VotingEdit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Voting has closed.

  •   Support Mahir256 (talk) 00:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Aggregation and allways incomplete structures of Wiki projects Amadalvarez (talk) 05:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Babu (talk) 06:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Teseo (talk) 08:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Pennenetui3000 (talk) 20:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Alex Tanchoco (talk) 15:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Em-mustapha User | talk 00:04, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support The best. It does not include the English letter "f", which should be avoided by a multi language project.--維基小霸王 (talk) 02:21, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support memorable design --Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 10:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support the design is quiet meaningfun and is 'script free', i.e. isin't based on just the latin or greek alphabet but more on the 'concept' of function, hence is more logical and inclusive--    Innocentbunny    TALK  13:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Beauty! ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Daniel Mietchen (talk) 03:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Superchilum(talk to me!) 22:24, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support neat and well-thought. -- টিটো দত্ত (কথা) 02:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Too many f's, w's, and lambdas around where it would be hard to explain to a non-English or non-tech savvy people in a developing country where I am, while this one is more abstract and cool. RXerself (talk) 04:09, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Ziko (talk) 07:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support KPFC💬 09:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Spasimir (talk) 11:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   SupportWikiLucas (🖋️) 17:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support --Camelia (talk) 20:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Ldorfman (talk) 23:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support ThurnerRupert (talk) 11:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Photonoxx (talk) 07:16, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support I like the fact that it doesn't throw a lambda or a W at your face, and go to a more straight forward symbol. A logo which aim to stand for something cross-cultural should not include a letter of some alphabet, and even less rely on academic arcane naming conventions like lambda (that is, anonymous) calculus. Other proposals use human in their description, but this is the unique one which resemble a human face sketch. The hub should be rotated to make this suggestion more clear however. --Psychoslave (talk) 08:04, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Quiddity (talk) 17:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.