Open main menu

I use the same user name on Wikitravel, Wikivoyage and Wikipedia
--W. Franke-mailtalk 15:12, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Travel Guide Naming ProcessEdit

states that "Affected Travel Community Members" ..." may vote from any one registered account you own on a qualified wiki (you may only vote once, regardless of how many accounts you own). Please provide a backlink to a contribution history with no fewer than 25 edits on an affected travel community site. To qualify, this account must":

  1. not be a bot; and
  2. have made at least 25 edits there.

This is the requisite backlink: http://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/W._Frank --W. Franke-mailtalk 20:23, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia Travel Guide: Naming poll openEdit

Hi there,

You are receiving this message because you edited the initial naming straw poll for the Wikimedia Travel Guide.

The proposed naming poll is now open and you can vote for as many of the proposed names as you wish, if you are eligible. Please see Travel Guide/Naming Process for full details on voting eligibility and how the final name will be selected. Voting will last for 14 days, and will terminate on 16 October at 06:59:59 UTC.

Thanks, Thehelpfulone 23:05, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia Travel Guide: Naming poll openEdit

Hi there,

You are receiving this message because you voiced your opinion at the Request for Comment on the Wikimedia Travel Guide.

The proposed naming poll opened a few days ago and you can vote for as many of the proposed names as you wish, if you are eligible. Please see Travel Guide/Naming Process for full details on voting eligibility and how the final name will be selected. Voting will last for 14 days, and will terminate on 16 October at 06:59:59 UTC.

Thanks, Thehelpfulone 22:11, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Out of lineEdit

this is out of line. First of all, you brought it up, not me, and I'm done letting you simply cast your aspersions without responding to them. Second of all, you owe everyone an explanation of your "your club's personal vendetta" line; either justify it or quit it. LtPowers (talk) 22:38, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

And so is this.
Try not to lose sight of the ball:
State clearly whether the two things I proposed (and others have agreed with) is a "good idea" or a "bad idea" and why, please - and stop doing lazy and sloppy reverts on good faith edits. If there is something you object to, then edit that to change it - and be prepared to justify your edit. --W. Franke-mailtalk 23:45, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Or you could stop using the tactic of interspersing good edits with bad ones so that those of us with better things to do don't have to tediously pick through change-by-change and selectively revert. LtPowers (talk) 12:32, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "W. Frank".