Hi Denny. Could you answer a couple quick questions about the what happened around the board approval of Wikilambda?
- When the board resolution approving the project was made on May 22, were you informed of the decision?
- If so, did the board (or WMF staff) specifically instruct you to not publicly reveal this information until the announcement six weeks later?
- yes, I was informed.
- no, WMF did not instruct me to not reveal the decision, but we worked together on how to get the message out. After all it also involved me giving leave at my previous job, etc.
Hello, I think it will be better we continue here rather than there. It's alright, we typically allow users to complain or even talk about topics tangentially relevant to their block. The reason why this is different is that the user in particular is blocked for disruption for discussions on the scowiki RFC, and in the meanwhile, they attempted to cause disruption to other similar discussions in which Abstract Wikipedia conversation is sort of similiar to the "other similiar discussions" they disrupted. In addition, they are taking our indulgence way too excessive, abusing talkapage privileges even more by repeating things they get blocked with. The admin team here on meta is close to revoking talk page access only until their global ban discussion took place, this caused us to be wiling to allow them to only participate in the discussion by their talkpage. I.e. their talkpage should be used only for global ban discussion (responses from them), nothing else. This is an unique situation, so I know it will be hard for you to understand if you didn't follow everything. No worries, sorry for the note (I know can be unpleasant) and thanks for your understanding. Regards,Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:46, 28 September 2020 (UTC)