User:Anthere/2001-2008
Some thoughts
editI have been there for so long...
From time to time, I go read back some of the stuff I wrote last year, two years ago, three years ago, four years ago...
- User:Anthere/Année 2005 (my summary of year 2005)
- User:Anthere/retrospective (this, I wrote during the second board elections)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anthere/Values (written sometime in 2004)
- Incivility - early 2004, when I joined the mediation committee. It became a reference...
- About Cliques and Communities (CABAL stuff)
- Disarmament crisis of March 2003 (easy to date... I fled the english wikipedia. A poor place to stay at for a french at that time)
- Listening to our garden (old stuff - 2003 ?)
- Future of international Wikipedias as part of the main community -- Wikipedias and cross-fertilisation (digging... this is 2002....)
- I think of you as a center in a very large collection of inter-connected webs. The webs carry information, and you help direct it where it can create positive changes. Amgine irc 20:41, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Thought : Elles ne pensent qu'à ça:
séduire, pour pouvoir se reproduire.
Les plantes à fleurs, dernière grande innovation du monde végétal, manipulent les insectes, les animaux, et même les hommes, pour assurer leur dissémination.
Other contributions on meta and related topic
systemes -- Reflexions sur la bioethique -- m:WikiWomen -- m:Premier communiqué de presse de Wikimédia -- apology -- Dispute resolution -- Source of conflict -- Open and free -- User:Anthere/logos -- Biz Dev Bible -- Zambia Workshop -- PixelACHE
Anthere's old stuff (2001-2008)
editInterviews/articles
editActually, it was pretty exciting to answer my first interviews and even more exciting to see my name cited. Not to mention pictures being published. Maybe it is routine now ? But I do not really report published articles any more....expect when it raises a special warm memory. In my "press" memories, I think the greatest moment was when we first got a BIG article in Le Monde. I started sending press releases to Le Monde in 2002. With no resultats whatsoever... till they finally contacted us in fall 2005. It really felt enormous. Since then, many articles have been written about us, some good, some terribly bad. It has indeed become a sort of routine. I will nevertheless keep that list as well as all the issues sent to me by snail mails. Maybe to show the kids later ;-).
- + "כדי לתפעל את ויקיפדיה צריך 8 מיליון דולר בשנה" (okay, for the satisfaction of reading the translation :-)) (24 11 2008)
- + Florence Devouard : Dans les coulisses de wikipedia - 23/06/2008
- + Il y aura de la vidéo sur Wikipedia- 01 net fevrier 08
- + Pédagogie sur le CNDP (novembre 07)
- +What the future hold for Wikipedia janvier 08
- +A propos de l'avenir de Wikipedia décembre 07
- +Lire le web participatif (octobre 2007)
- + Partage avec Mme Wikipedia sur AdaOnline (juillet 2007) J'ai passé une excellente journée dans les bureaux de ADA. Une page souvenir
- + Telegraaf (Title: "To make Wikipedia accessible for the blind")
- + ZDNet and ZDNet
- + Portraits - Culture intensive Libération (03 01 2007)
- + Wikipedia : une encyclopédie sur le Net Le Monde (02 12 2006)
- + Nous souhaitons transformer Wikipedia en organisation durable (24 11 2006)
- + Wikipedia ottaa uuden suunnan (30 10 2006) did you get the title right ? The article has been nicely translated now :-))
- + Wikipedia cherche la parade contre les vandales - l'express (6 12 2005)
- + La crédibilité de Wikipedia en question l'expansion (6 12 2005)
- + Wikipedia, une encyclopédie libertaire sur le Net - Le Monde (02 09 2005)
- + Florida Trends (september 2005)
- + 24 ORE (september 2005)
- + Wikipedia ne durcira pas ses regles de publication - 01 Net (août 2005)
- + le wiki à l'école de l'information (24/06/2005)
- + Neteconomie: Les blogs et wikis autorisent ce que nous appelons le journalisme citoyen
- + cité des sciences (april 2005)
- + Les Échos : Le wiki veut libérer le travail collaboratif, article du 16 février 2005, traitant de la galaxie wiki, mais avec comme exemple phare Wikipédia. (article payant) (scan provisoire)
- + Management n° 199 (march 2005)
- + Terra Economica (with login)
- + Journal 24 heures - Suisse
- + SVM - Septembre 2004 : [1] et & [2]
- + sur 01net
- + BFM (archive) (27 nov 2004)
- + libération
- + http://wikimedia.org/media/paris_meeting_2004.ogg
- + docforum
- + Smau
- + Carrefour-education au Québec
- + Journal du Net (12 janvier 2004)
- + notiziaweb
- + Tribune de Genève
Some speeches and presentations
editI try to list here some presentations I do, with the links to the documents themselves, in particular when it covers a new topic. I can not count anymore the presentations made on Wikipedia itself.
- + Wikimania talk, Alexandrina, Egypt, July 2008. Communication issues: musings of a dinosaur
- + opening ceremony of Wikimania 2008, Alexandria, Egypt, July 2008. [3]
- + petit déjeuner CCI Clermont Fd. "Comment se protéger des risques sociaux de la création ?"; Juillet 08
- + DEVCON 2008 - Dassault Systems - Panel sur le "Crowdsourcing". June 08
- + Lyon Infocités Lyon Game; podcast - May 08
- + Cisco - Connected Women - Mai 2008
- +Club des Entrepreneurs du 9ème, Paris, "Wikipedia : nouveau mythe, nouvelles pratiques, nouveaux Entrepreneurs", Mai 2008
- + ARDEP Auvergne - mars 2008
- + Accenture: Journée Internationale de la Femme - « Entretiens Accent sur elles » "Découvrez vos opportunités dans le monde multipolaire" (mars 2008), Blog Report sur le site d'Isabelle Juppé
- + Netexplorateur 2008 (fevrier 2008): [4] - Mars 2008
- + Petits Déjeuners de NetStrategy/JMC (janvier 08): Globalisation, collaboration, personnalisation - quel rôle pour le 2.0 ?
- + Efferve's sciences, dec 07 Wikipédia : point sur un projet d’encyclopédie collaborative et questions ouvertes
- + Cap Digital- Entretiens du Nouveau Monde Industriel - novembre 2007
- + Workshop Cornell. Novembre 2007, Zambia
- + Fed Française du Batiment, Batimat, Paris, 9 nov 2007
- + Séminaire « Economie du numérique dans l'enseignement", Paris, 24-25 oct 2007
- + Wikimedia Netherland Conference, 29 oct, Amsterdam
- + Education Tech Conf, Amsterdam, 13th october
- + E-learning conference, Lisbon, oct 06 ppt
- + ENSAIA, Nancy, septembre 200
- + CCI Universités, Toulouse, septembre 2007
- + Cap Gemini Universities, Paris, aout 2007
- + Wikimania 2007, Taiwan, aout 2007 [5]
- +EBG, Paris, 20 juin
- + Paris Libre, Paris, 13 juin
- + UNESCO, Kromberg meeting, Germany, juin 2007 [6], [7]
- + Club of Rome, Bruxelles. 25 mai 2007.
- + ADA, Bruxelles, 24 mai 2007 [8]
- + CUST, 29 mars, Clermont Ferrand
- + BNF, 15 mars 2007. "Les "Wikis": édition en question"
- + ADBGV, 13 mars 2007, Nice
- + LeadAwards, Hamburg, 28 février. [9]
- + LIFT 2007: rec
- + BM Lyon. 23 janvier. "à l'heure de l'Internet collaboratif, serions-nous tous des lumières?"
- +Open Mind, 24-25 oct 2006: Wikipedia : a sustainable open and free project?
- + Convention UMP : « La nouvelle frontière : la société du savoir - 4 october 2006 - [10]
- + World Public Forum, Dialogue of Civilizations -Presentation of Wikipedia - Rhodes 27 sept-1 oct 2006. [11]
- + Digital World African Conference - Wikipedia: Empowering. Abuja (Nigeria) - 12-13 sept 2006- [12]
- + The Geneva Forum on Health- Geneva 31 august 2006 [13]
- + Wikimedia Foundation: Building in Diversity - Wikimania 2006. Boston, 2-5th august 2006
- + Rencontres Mondiales du Logiciel Libre - Wikinews : le libre au service de l’information - Nancy, Juillet 2006 [14]
- + Gartner Event : Open Source 2006 - june 2006 - Panel.
- + La mondialisation du savoir : Wikipédia, un projet encyclopédique ou rubrique rubrique collection Parole en réseau.- BPI, Centre Pompidou. Paris. May 2006
- + Savoirs ouverts et production de bien communs en réseau. paris 3 décembre 2006 - pdf
- + FLOSS conference sept 2005 : Presentation of WMF and Wikiversity
- + [15] (Video (Wikimania august 2005) presentation : Wikimedia projects in the developing world
- + http://www.pixelache.ac/ (april 2005) : One of the presentations : Wikipedia presentation
- + TIC21, janvier 2005
- + User:Anthere/table ronde (DocForum)
Current issues
edit(a rough digest of what's topical on the mailing list & elsewhere)
- WikiImages.org
- URL Linking Bug
- Cologne Blue skin problems
- Inline Linking
- Logo history
- Link style vote - should links be underlined or not?
- Wikitext standard - including Wikipedia DTD
- Wikipedia subtitle translations for the new logos
- Linguistic democracy in a multilingual project
- Why Wikipedia runs slow
- Redirected user pages considered harmful
- About attempts to get maps for Wikipedia
- Please help write Wikimedia's first press release
- SVG whiteboard Draw within an SVG file on WP?
- Help us find a Wikipedia mascot!
- Wikipedia.org is more popular than...
- Persuasion technology anyone to help before it is properly put somewhere ?
- Mysterious wikipedia user subpages ?
- Wikipedia Weekly News -- a proposed weekly newsletter.
- What to do with www.wiktionary.org
- Quality of articles
- permission grant extent - are we allowed to use all content under the GFDL? or just text?
- Inclusionism vs Deletionism
Interlingual issues
edit- Thoughts on language integration - Proposal on language integration: merge of database
- Two Russian WPs
-
Thomas with the little teddy bear offered by Ward Cunningham
-
Gorilla handling a baby (Thomas) at Wikimania 2006
-
NotAGorilla
-
Jimmy Wales and I at Wikimania 2006
-
mon futur régime alimentaire. Wikimania 2007
-
With organizers of Elearning Conf in Lisbon - Oct 2007
Usability and user interface
edit- What to do with www.wikipedia.org
- Move meta.wikipedia.org to wikimedia.org?
- The provisional portal of Wikipedia
- Protected pages considered harmful
- EnlargeSpace. If the conflict is over limited resources, increase resources to an acceptable (satisficing) level.
- SeekThirdParties? as ConflictMediator. When stuck against the thorny bushes, get a third party involved to help end the dispute. Conciliation, consultation, mediation, arbitration, adjudication or authoritative command.
- CompromiseAgreement?. Each party gives up something for the greater good of each other.
- SeekCommonGround?. Different from compromise, seek out the common ground that both sides hold. Deliberately focusing on something that can be agreed upon can break the adversarial cycle. It can also reveal the blindingly obvious solution that is staring you in the face.
- ChangeThePeople?. Train people to deal with others better, and to alter needling attitudes. Deals with PersonalityConflict.
- ChangeTheStructure?. Deal with StructuralConflict by fixing the structure.
- TimeOut?. Take a deep breath, go for a walk, come back later ... and things may look different.
- AgreeToDisagree?. Some conflicts will never be "solved", only abated. Live and let live.
- SurrenderWithGrace?. Agree to let it go their way, not yours. Similar to AgreeToDisagree?, except available even when the conflict isn't totally intractable. You decide that this is not the hill to die on. Surrender the battle, win the war.
- Wiki:RetireGracefully. Even if you've won.
- Wiki:JediMindTrick. Works in the movies. Might work for you too.
- ReFocusCommonGround?. End turns at stating your position by stating something that you do genuinely agree with or respect about the person you are in conflict with. This tends to reduce the SaintsOrSinners? polarisation that otherwise maintains conflict. Be careful not to let this morph into the AntiPattern? of shallow lipservice of agreement -- having the statement of agreement occur at the end of your turn, without embellishment, helps there.
- Vote. Of course, voting should be the last resort. (see VotingIsEvil, WikiVoting)
- TacticalDistraction? -- distract the participants. Popping a balloon or dropping a tray of glasses can work wonders. This is most useful where the conflict has taken on a life of its own, and works best when a non-involved party does the intervention.
- TacticalEngagement? -- Engage one of the parties of the conflict in a discussion/debate, drawing away their energies from the conflict. A key point is that the debate is engaged not to win the debate, but simply to distract and engage the opponent. Similar to TacticalDistraction?, but takes more resources to effect, and occurs over a longer timespan.
- Fork the community -- see RightToFork, ForkingOfOnlineCommunities.
- ShoutThemDown?. Don't let a single point slide, hammer every point, repeat to absurdum.Eventually you will wear down your opponent and they may either AgreeToDisagree?, compromise, or SurrenderWithGrace? (or without). See also Wiki:ConversationalChaff
- EnlistIdiots?. Bolster your side by appealing to the peanut gallery, apply sophistry to appeal to the unwashed masses passing by. Encourage them to add their voice to your side of the debate. Deploy demagogurey.
- Involve more people. The more you spread the conflict, whether by enlisting idiots or just ordinary people, the longer it is likely to go on for and the more damage it is likely to do.
- LieCheatSteal?. Pretend to AgreeToDisagree?, compromise, (etc), but its just a charade. As soon as their back is turned you strike.