Talk:Requests for comment/2013 issues on Croatian Wikipedia/Evidence
The following request for comments is closed. The information gathering period is over. Please see the main RfC page for more info.
These pages are bilingual, in English and Croatian. Please feel free to start a new topic in either language. Also feel free to discuss in Wikipedia languages closely related to Croatian, using Latin script. | Ove stranice su dvojezične, na engleskom i hrvatskom. Slobodno započnite novu temu na bilo kojem od tih jezika. Također slobodno raspravljajte na Wikipedijinim jezicima blisko srodnima hrvatskom, koristeći latinično pismo. |
The purpose of this section is to keep track of who was notified about these pages, by whom, when, and why. This follows the recommended guideline to prevent canvassing. Please do not archive this section. Miranche (talk) 22:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
Specific canvassing considerations for this page were discussed here. Please feel free to start a new talk topic if you believe there are issues that have not been properly met by this discussion, or if you believe any of the notifications were improper. Miranche (talk) 04:06, 2 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
- sh:Korisnik:Seiya [1] Notified about moving Seiya's premature submissions to the new page format, encouraged to continue contributing. Miranche (talk) 08:00, 27 September 2013 (CEST).
- User:Sj [2] Notified about moving Sj's premature contributions to the new page format, and asked for feedback on the pages. Miranche (talk) 17:34, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
- User:Wikiwind [3] Asked for feedback on this page due to previous involvement on the talk page. Miranche (talk) 17:36, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Meta:AN [4] Notified that the effort is starting, mentioned that the pages are at risk of vandalism, and asked for general advice. Miranche (talk) 23:02, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Bosnian Wikipedia's village pump [5] Invited all interested parties to submit and comment on evidence. GregorB (talk) 23:25, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia's village pump [6] Invited all interested parties to submit and comment on evidence. GregorB (talk) 23:25, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Serbian Wikipedia's village pump [7] Invited all interested parties to submit and comment on evidence. GregorB (talk) 23:25, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Made an additional comment there to address skepticism over whether evidence gathering is pointless or not. Noted meta is a neutral venue, and evidence gathering was explicitly endorsed by Jimbo.[8] GregorB (talk) 13:03, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Followed up. Miranche (talk) 04:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Croatian Wikipedia's village pump [9] Invited all interested parties to submit and comment on evidence. Miranche (talk) 00:06, 30 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Jimbo Wales [10] Notified that the effort is starting, and that there are reservations about it expressed on meta:AN. Miranche (talk) 00:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
- RfC [11] Changed the notice in the original discussion section.
Will later add a new section to RfC noting the page is open.Miranche (talk) 04:46, 30 September 2013 (UTC)Reply - RfC [12] Added bilingual announcement. Miranche (talk) 18:56, 30 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Croatian Wikipedia village pump [13] Re-posted the annoucement after the original was archived with all other discussions in the month of September. Miranche (talk) 21:10, 1 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Participated in a longer discussion that followed the announcement. Miranche (talk) 04:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Invited all interested parties to submit and comment on evidence in the WikiProject Croatia's talk page. [14] GregorB (talk) 20:39, 6 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
- RfC [15] Added a visible announcement on top, after several hr.wiki users remarked on the unilingual nature of the page. Miranche (talk) 23:41, 4 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Bosnian Wikipedia village pump [16] Re-posted the announcement on after the original announcement was archived. Miranche (talk) 22:43, 8 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
- RfC [17], Croatian Wikipedia village pump [18], Stewards' noticeboard [19], Jimbo Wales [20] Notified that the info gathering is closed. Miranche (talk) 08:52, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
- Trijnstel [21] Asked for opinion on how to manage wrapping up the pages. Miranche (talk) 06:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
- Sj [22] Asked for opinion & assistance in wrapping up the pages. Miranche (talk) 04:29, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
- RfC [23] Modified the notification in the original discussion thread to reflect the end of main info gathering. Miranche (talk) 04:40, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
- RfC [24], Croatian Wikipedia village pump [25] Updated announcements to reflect the end of the comment period. Miranche (talk) 23:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
If there are no objections, I will close the evidence pages at 00:00 UTC on 2014-02-26, and these talk pages 24 hours later. Miranche (talk) 18:04, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
- Ok, closing. Miranche (talk) 05:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
- Closed. Please see the archives for past discussions. Miranche (talk) 00:00, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
- Hello Miranche, thank you for this work. Were any conclusions drawn from the RfC? Normally a closure comes with a summary and directions for any followup action. –SJ talk 23:38, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- Sj, you're welcome, and thank you for the kind word. Sorry if it isn't clear from this section: the evidence pages were closed because all the time periods (for submissions, commenting etc.) have expired. There aren't any conclusions but this wasn't the aim, rather it was to gather information relevant to the main RfC, and all the summary, directions etc., if any, should eventually emerge there. Right now the main RfC seems largely inactive. Miranche (talk) 22:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- Ah, that makes sense. Thank you. Who would you expect to close that? –SJ talk 03:25, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- Sj, you're welcome, and thank you for the kind word. Sorry if it isn't clear from this section: the evidence pages were closed because all the time periods (for submissions, commenting etc.) have expired. There aren't any conclusions but this wasn't the aim, rather it was to gather information relevant to the main RfC, and all the summary, directions etc., if any, should eventually emerge there. Right now the main RfC seems largely inactive. Miranche (talk) 22:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- Hello Miranche, thank you for this work. Were any conclusions drawn from the RfC? Normally a closure comes with a summary and directions for any followup action. –SJ talk 23:38, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- Closed. Please see the archives for past discussions. Miranche (talk) 00:00, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply