Talk:Communications committee/Subcommittees
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Anonymous Dissident in topic Title
Please leave comments or suggestions here. Aspirant members may be expected to be a local chapter board member or a member of Comcom support groups including ComProj (for presscom etc.), OTRS (for OTRScom) or TCPL (for transcom).
- Press
- I am interested in this subcommittee User:Waerth
- Internal communication
- I could help in Spanish speaking projects. I could also post in non Spanish speaking projects, where most/all its users would understand Spanish: "ladino, gallego, catalán, bable, aragonés, euskera, quechua, aymara,..." --Javier Carro 09:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Press
- I'm interested in this subcommittee. I minored in Communications in college (significantly minored, it was my major for 3 years), majored in political science, and am now a law student. I've done several major print media, TV, and radio interviews, mostly on behalf of my role as a lobbyist, but occasionally for wikipedia. List includes the New York Times, GQ, Palm Beach Post, Chronicle of Higher Education, a broadcast story on Fox news and subsequent documentary, as well as media coordination for a large, national lobbyist organization that receives regular media requests from Fox news, CNN Lou Dobb's Tonight, NPR, Washington Post, New York Times, and quite a few others. I've also testified before a commission of the Florida House of Representatives. I truly believe in the concept of Wikipedia, as well as its execution, and I'd love to help out. Swatjester 12:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, for joining Press committee, maybe you could consider to join Communication Projects Group first. --H.T. Chien ( Talk / Contributions ) 12:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. Joining ComProj is a good idea. We need to update this page, perhaps ...--Aphaia 12:42, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, for joining Press committee, maybe you could consider to join Communication Projects Group first. --H.T. Chien ( Talk / Contributions ) 12:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Title
editIt feels like this page would be better suited to being a subpage of communications committee in the form of communications committee/subcommittees. Am I mistaken? If not, will a move be fine? —Anonymous DissidentTalk 02:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- It seems fine just where it is. "If it ain't broken.. then don't fix it." :-) --Az1568 (talk) 02:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Eh, I hear that a lot. But I never said it was broken. I just said that an improvement would be easy and would take two seconds. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:09, 16 February 2009 (UTC)