Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/elections 2009/statements/Erwin

< Stewards | elections 2009 | statements
Warning The 2009 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Erwin

edit

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  • Personal info: I've been involved with Wikimedia since late 2005. Since then, I've become a bureaucrat at the Dutch Wikipedia, my home wiki, an admin at the Dutch Low Saxon Wikipedia, Dutch Wikibooks and at Meta and been granted global rollback (see my matrix). I also have a toolserver account where I host a number of tools and run some bots. I'd like to be a steward on one hand to help me fight cross-wiki spam and vandalism and on the other to help out with requests and maintenance. As a member of the SWMT I've been doing the first for some time. I guess most of my contributions here are related to the spam blacklist. As a steward my cross-wiki focus will still be on current spam and vandalism, but I'd also like to clean up on projects without admins, e.g. speedy deletions (note: this page takes quite some time to load).
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich bin seit Ende 2005 in der Wikimedia aktiv. Seitdem bin ich ein Bürokrat bei der niederländischen Wikipedia, meinem Heimatwiki, geworden, und Admin bei der niedersächischen Wikipedia, den niederländischen Wikibooks und auf Meta, und mir wurde das globale Rollback-Recht verliehen, man siehe auch User:Erwin/Matrix. Ich habe auch einen Toolserver-Account, wo ich eine Reihe von Tools und einige Bots laufen habe. Ich wäre einerseits gerne Steward, um mir die Bekämpfung des Crosswiki-Spams und -Vandalismus zu erleichtern, und andererseits, um bei Anfragen und der Verwaltung zu helfen. Als Mitglied der SWMT mache ich ersteres schon seit einiger Zeit. Ich schätze, die meisten Beiträge von mir hier haben mit der Spam-Blacklist zu tun. Als Steward läge mein Fokus immer noch auf dem aktuellen Spam und Vandalismus, aber ebenso würde ich auf adminlosen Projekten aufräumen, zum Beispiel speedy deletions (beachte: diese Seite braucht einige Zeit zum laden).
français:
  • Langues: nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  • Renseignements personnels: je suis impliqué dans Wikimedia depuis fin 2005. Depuis je suis devenu : bureaucrate sur la Wikipédia en néerlandais (mon wiki d'origine) et administrateur sur Wikipédia en Dutch Low Saxon, Wikibooks en néerlandais et sur Meta. J'ai également le statut de global rollback (voir User:Erwin/Matrix). J'ai un compte sur le toolserver où j'héberge un certain nombre d'outils et où je fais tourner quelques bots. J'aimerais être steward pour d'une part aider à lutter contre le spam et le vandalisme cross-wiki et d'autre part aider à traiter les requêtes et aider à la maintenance. En tant que membre du SWMT je fais déjà parfois le premier point. Je pense que la plupart de mes contributions ici concernent la spam blacklist. Le point de mire de mon action de steward sera toujours d'être sur le spam et le vandalisme, mais j'aimerais aussi faire de la maintenance sur des projets sans admins, comme par exemple traiter les speedy deletions (note : cette page mets un certain temps à se charger).
italiano:
  • Lingue: nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  • Informazioni personali: Sono interessato a Wikimedia dalla fine del 2005. Da allora, sono divenuto burocrate sulla Wikipedia in lingua olandese, la mia home wiki, amministratore sulla Wikipedia Dutch Low Saxon, su Wikibooks in lingua olandese e su Meta. Mi è stato inoltre abilitato il flag di global rollback, vedi User:Erwin/Matrix. Posseggo inoltre un toolserver account su toolserver dove sono residenti un certo numero di tool e girano alcuni bot. Mi piacerebbe diventare uno steward da una parte per rendermi più semplice la lotta allo spam cross-wiki e al vandalismo, dall'altra per dare una mano con le diverse richieste e la manutenzione. Come membro del progetto SWMT ho collaborato per il primo obiettivo per un certo periodo. La maggior parte dei miei contributi su meta è riferita alla blacklist antispam. Come steward il mio obiettivo rimarrà focalizzato sullo spam corrente e sul vandalism, ma mi piacerebbe anche aiutare a fare del lavoro di pulizia anche sui progetti privi di amministratori, quali ad esempio speedy deletions (nota: la pagina richiede del tempo per essere caricata).
日本語:
  • 言語: nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  • 候補者の情報: 2005年末からウィキメディアに参加しています。私が主に利用しているオランダ語版ウィキペディアでビューロクラットとなってから、オランダ低ザクセン語版ウィキペディアとオランダ語版ウィキブックス、およびメタで管理者となり、全ウィキ差し戻しの権限も与えられています。User:Erwin/Matrixをご覧ください。また、多くのツールが置かれているツールサーバのアカウントを持っており、いくつかボットを動かしています。 私はスチュワードになって、一方で複数ウィキにまたがるスパムや荒らしと戦い、また他方では依頼やメンテナンスの手助けをしたいと思っています。SWMTの一員として私は度々初めてのことをしてきました。私のここでの投稿のほとんどはスパムブラックリストに関係したものだと思います。スチュワードとして、私の複数ウィキ間での焦点は現在のスパムと荒らしに当たり続けるとおもいますが、それだけでなく、管理者のいないプロジェクトで例えば即時削除（注意:このページは表示にかなり時間がかかります）をするなどのクリーンアップもしたいと思っています。
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Sinds eind 2005 ben ik betrokken bij Wikimedia. Sindsdien ben ik bureaucraat geworden op de Nederlandstalige Wikipedia, mijn thuisproject, een moderator op de Nedersaksische Wikipedia, Nederlandstalige Wikibooks en op Meta en is mij global rollback toevertrouwd, zie User:Erwin/Matrix. Ik heb een toolserver account waar ik een aantal "tools" aanbiedt en vanwaar ik verschillende bots draai. Ik wil graag steward worden enerzijds om beter te kunnen omgaan met cross-wiki spam en vandalisme en anderzijds om te helpen met verzoeken en onderhoud. Als lid van het SWMT houd ik me al enige tijd bezig met het eerste. Mijn bijdragen op Meta zijn waarschijnlijk grotendeels gerelateerd aan de spam blacklist. Als steward zullen mijn cross-wiki bijdragen nog steeds gericht zijn op recente spam en vandalisme, maar ik wil ook graag schoonmaken op projecten zonder moderatoren, bijvoorbeeld Nuweg-nominaties (NB het duurt vrij lang om die pagina te laden).
polski:
  • Języki: nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  • Informacje osobiste: Biorę udział w prjektach Wikimedia od końca 2005. Od tej pory zostałem biurokratą holenderskeij Wikipedii, mojej rodzimej, administratorem na dolnosakosńskiej holenderskiej, holenderskich Wikibooks i na Meta oraz otrzymałem prawo globalnego rewertowania, patrz User:Erwin/Matrix. Mam również konto na toolserverze gdzie utrzymuję kilka narzędzi i botów. Chciałbym zostać stewardem by z jednej strony łatwiej zwalczać międzyprojektowy spam i wandalizmy, a z drugiej by pomóc w zgłoszeniach i utrzymaniu. Jako członek SWMT robię to pierwsze już od pewnego czasu. Wydaje mi się, że większość mojego wkładu jest związana listami antyspamowymi. Jako steward będę nadal koncentrował się na spamie i wandalizmach ale chciałbym również oczyścić projekty bez administratorów jak na przykład ekspresowe kasowanko (uwaga: ta strona ładuje sie dosyć długo).
português:
  • Línguas: nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  • Informações pessoais: Eu estou envolvido com a Wikimedia desde 2005. Desde então eu recebi o estatuto de burocrata na Wikipédia neerlandesa, minha wiki local, e de administrador na Wikipédia em baixo-saxão neerlandês, meta e wikibooks em neerlandês, vejam por favor User:Erwin/Matrix. Eu também tenho uma conta de usuário no toolserver onde eu desenvolvi uma série de ferramentas e rodei alguns bots. Eu gostaria de ser um steward para, por um lado ajudar no combate ao vandalismo e spam cross-wiki, e por outro ajudar com os pedidos e com a manutenção, que, como um membro do Small Wiki Monitoring Team eu venho fazendo já há algum tempo. Eu acho que a maioria das minhas contribuições aqui estão relacionadas com a spam blacklist. Como steward, meu foco continuará sendo o combate ao vandalismo e spam cross-wiki, mas também gostaria de ajudar na manutenção de projectos que não tem administradores activos, como por exemplo eliminando páginas (nota: esta página demora um certo tempo para carregar).
русский:
  • Языки: nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  • Личная информация: Я участвую в проектах Викимедиа с конца 2005 года. С этого времени я стал бюрократом в нидерландском языковом разделе, моём основном вики, админом в нидерландском вики Нижней Саксонии, нидерландском викиучебнике, а на мете я получил флаг глобального отката, см. User:Erwin/Matrix. Кроме этого, у меня есть аккаунт на тулсервере, с помощью которого я сделал ряд инструментов и запускаю нескольких ботов. Я хочу быть стюардом, с одной стороны, для того, чтобы бороться с кросс-вики-вандализмом и спамом, а с другой, для ответов на запросы и для технического обслуживания. Как член SWMT, я занимался первым некоторое время. Думаю, большая часть моего вклада здесь заключается во внесении сайтов в спам-лист. Как стюард, я буду продолжать заниматься кросс-вики-спамом и вандализмом, а также буду помогать «прибирать» проекты без админов после вандалов, например, с помощью быстрых удалений (примечание: подождите, пока страница догрузится).
中文:
  • 可说语言: nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  • 个人资料: 自从2005年底以来我致力于维基媒体项目。从那时开始我在我的主维基，荷兰语维基，担任一名行政员；在荷兰Low Saxon语维基百科、荷兰语维基教科书和元维基担任管理员。并被授予全局回退权限（见my matrix）。我也拥有一个Toolserver帐户，在那上面我运行着不少工具和一些机器人。 我成为一个监管员后将在一方面来对付跨维基的垃圾内容和破坏行为，另一方面，我希望能协助处理各种请求及帮助维护。作为SWMT的成员，在某些时候我已经开始进行第一项工作。我想，我在这里的大部分贡献将与垃圾内容黑名单有关。作为监管员，我跨维基活动的焦点将仍在垃圾内容和破坏行为，但我同样愿意帮助没有管理员的项目进行清理工作，例如快速删除（注：该页的加载需要一些时间）。
中文（简体）:
  • 可说语言: nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  • 个人资料: 自从2005年底以来我致力于维基媒体项目。从那时开始我在我的主维基，荷兰语维基，担任一名行政员；在荷兰Low Saxon语维基百科、荷兰语维基教科书和元维基担任管理员。并被授予全局回退权限（见my matrix）。我也拥有一个Toolserver帐户，在那上面我运行着不少工具和一些机器人。 我成为一个监管员后将在一方面来对付跨维基的垃圾内容和破坏行为，另一方面，我希望能协助处理各种请求及帮助维护。作为SWMT的成员，在某些时候我已经开始进行第一项工作。我想，我在这里的大部分贡献将与垃圾内容黑名单有关。作为监管员，我跨维基活动的焦点将仍在垃圾内容和破坏行为，但我同样愿意帮助没有管理员的项目进行清理工作，例如快速删除（注：该页的加载需要一些时间）。
中文（繁體）:
  • 可說語言: nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  • 個人資料: 自從2005年底以來我致力於維基媒體項目。從那時開始我在我的主維基，荷蘭語維基，擔任一名行政員；在荷蘭Low Saxon語維基百科、荷蘭語維基教科書和元維基擔任管理員。並被授予全局回退權限（見my matrix）。我也擁有一個Toolserver帳戶，在那上面我運行著不少工具和一些機器人。 我成為一個監管員後將在一方面來對付跨維基的垃圾內容和破壞行為，另一方面，我希望能協助處理各種請求及幫助維護。作為SWMT的成員，在某些時候我已經開始進行第一項工作。我想，我在這裡的大部分貢獻將與垃圾內容黑名單有關。作為監管員，我跨維基活動的焦點將仍在垃圾內容和破壞行為，但我同樣願意幫助沒有管理員的項目進行清理工作，例如快速刪除 （注：該頁的加載需要一些時間）。


  Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

  Yes

edit
ja WOBE3333 11:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 16:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Lolsimon 00:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Experienced global rollbackers should be fine in this role. Majorly talk 00:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. NuclearWarfare 00:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Mr.Z-man 00:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Kanonkas 00:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Cbrown1023 talk 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Az1568 (talk) 00:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Support Udufruduhu 00:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Herr Kriss 00:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Sí/Yes/はい. --Taichi - (あ！) 00:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Yes. Knows where he should use the stewardship for. Romaine 00:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Kalan ? 01:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Yes. Marcus Cyron 01:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Ivan Štambuk 01:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Erwin does excellent work with spam and vandalism, is consistently level-headed, and takes a collaborative approach, which I particularly like.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Nishkid64 (talk) 01:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19.   Support — neuro(talk) 01:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --FollowTheMedia 01:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Shizhao 01:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. bibliomaniac15 03:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Revolus Echo der Stille 03:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. More workers are needed. --Millosh 04:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Wutsje 04:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Sir James 05:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Avjoska 06:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Eddylandzaat 07:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter: The user don't have an account on Meta with userpage linked to his/her homewiki. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 17:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28.   Support Gnangarra 08:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Redlinux 08:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Sebleouf 08:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Vd437 08:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Euku 08:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Kameraad Pjotr 09:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Dr. Gert Blazejewski 09:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. ken123 09:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC) ;-)[reply]
  36. --StSasha 10:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. yeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaa --.snoopy. ✉ 10:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. --Wing 10:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Willemo 10:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Efbé   10:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Ja. Jon Harald Søby 10:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Fruggo 10:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Béria Lima Msg 10:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44.   Support--Konsnos 10:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Lockal 11:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Njaelkies Lea 11:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47.   Support Vyk 11:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. MannMaus 11:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Plenty of experience. feydey 11:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Good candidate. Jóna Þórunn 12:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Adnergje 12:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. oscar 12:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. --Florian Adler 12:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Forrestjunky 12:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. EUDOXIO 12:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. support axpdeHello! 12:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. MoiraMoira 13:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Durdane 13:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 16:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Cenarium (Talk) 13:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Multichill 14:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Annabel 14:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 14:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. --Lucien leGrey ( m | es ) 14:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. --MF-W 14:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64.   Support --Ahonc 14:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65.   Support --Patio 14:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66.   Support - Chrism 14:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67.   Support - Alter Fritz 15:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Obelix 15:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69.   Support - Ulflarsen 15:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70.   Support --Garfieldairlines 15:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. --Fabexplosive The archive man 15:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Erwin is a very experienced candidate and has shown that he is capable of carrying out the duties of the role. Rje 15:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Very competent cross wiki worker, should be fine. --Herby talk thyme 16:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Basvb 16:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75.   Support iAlex 17:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Does fine things We El 17:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter: The user don't have an account on Meta with userpage linked to his/her homewiki. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 17:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Jehochman 17:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Japiot 18:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Tim Q. Wells 18:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. -- Bryan (talk|commons) 18:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. --Jan Luca 18:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Dolledre 19:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Xenus 19:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83.   Support — NickK 19:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Mwpnl 19:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. –Ejs-80 21:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86.   Support - .Koen 22:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87. TheNeon 22:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88.   Support Chris 22:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89. --Jan eissfeldt 22:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90.   Support --Kjetil_r 23:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91.   Support --Nrainer 23:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92.   Support Meursault2004 23:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93. John Vandenberg 00:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. --Thogo (talk) 00:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95.   Support, yepyep. IJzeren Jan 00:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96.   Support Sunray 06:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97.   Support Alefbe 07:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. ~ putnik 08:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. --P@d@w@ne 09:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100. --Uwe Gille 09:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Seems sane->  Support.--Alnokta 10:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Sure --FiliP × 12:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103.   Support Brinkie 12:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC) see userpage for link to other usernames/projects[reply]
  104. Jaranda | wat's sup 14:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Szalakóta 14:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106.   Support --OosWesThoesBes 14:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107. GlassCobra 15:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108.   Support — MrDolomite • Talk 15:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109.   Support Migdejong 16:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110.   Support -- Lychee 16:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Larzzz 16:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112. ZX81 talk 18:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113. --S.Didam 19:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114.   Support. LaraLove (User:Jennavecia on my home wiki.) 19:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  115.   Pro. QuartierLatin1968 20:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  116.   Support --Marvin 101 21:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  117. ~ Seb35 22:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  118.   Support Pharaoh of the Wizards 23:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  119. --Davecrosby uk 00:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Support Timmyishappy 01:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 01:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  120. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 03:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Stef48 08:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  122.   Support - Punx 09:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Alex Pereira falaê 12:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  124.   Support Kingturtle 13:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  125.   Support Lutz Terheyden 15:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  126.   Support --High Contrast 18:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  127.   Support James F. (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Tiptoety talk 20:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  129. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  130.   Support Stewards should be like this.--Cerejota 04:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  131.   Support Of course ! Gonzolito 11:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  132. ...Aurora... 11:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  133.   Support - RobSchop 18:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Support - --Ulanwp 09:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote. Please see Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters. --Meno25 00:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  134.   Support perfect profile :) --Gdgourou 10:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Pjetter 12:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  136.   Support, good admin. ~Innvs: 12:26, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  137.   Support --Jorunn 12:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Filipe RibeiroMsg 13:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Oui Adailton 13:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  140. --Church of emacs 16:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  141.   Support Absolutely!Prashanthns 18:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Strong   Support based on direct experience of his good work on Meta. --A. B. (talk) 22:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  143.   Support - seems fine to me. Cheers! BD2412 T 05:02, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Support seems good. --Odesub 12:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote. Please see Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters. --Meno25 00:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Toby001 13:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  145.   Support Rosiestep 17:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Art Unbound 23:28, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Proofreader77 02:29, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  148.   SupportYou are the right candidate for Steward,Best wishes!! --Jigesh 09:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  149.   Support Eug 12:04, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  150.   Support EdBever 18:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  151. --Aphaia 18:49, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Support --§ Snake311 (I'm Not Okay!) 20:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. --Nick1915 - all you want 11:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  152.   Support --Daniel73480 11:05, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  153.   Support Poco a poco 11:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  154.   Support --Ziko 12:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  155.   Support. Yes! Looks like you have sufficient experience needed for stewardship. —Jamie☆S93 14:48, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  156.   Support Yes, of course!! Davin 15:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  157. IMatthew 21:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Malinaccier (talk) 00:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  159.   Support --Liangent 10:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Andrzej19 12:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  161. ok --Rax 23:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  162. According to his contributions and purposes, I consider I can be confident in him. O. Morand 00:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  163.   Support Sp5uhe 10:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  164.   Support aleichem 11:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  165.   Support Enormekever 13:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  166.   Support Looks Good! --Captain-tucker 14:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  167. --alexscho 15:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  168.   Support Good luck!--Larno Man 22:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  169.   Support Pevernagie 22:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Nbarth 01:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Storkk 03:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  172.   Support -- lucasbfr talk 09:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Support -- SvonHalenbach 14:07, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote. Please see Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters. --Meno25 00:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thats true. I am sorry, should have read the guidelines before. --SvonHalenbach 11:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  173.   Support --Diligent 19:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  174.   Support - Kaare 19:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  175.   Support - Drboisclair 23:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  176.   Support --4wajzkd02 09:46, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  177.   Support --MarkusZi 19:26, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  178.   Support--Thesupermat 09:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  179.   Support Maedin\talk 20:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  180. --Mayer Bruno 23:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC
  181.   Support --ysangkok 23:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  182.   Support -- Harrywad 23:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  183.   Support --Höyhens 03:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  184.   Support Tjako 16:41, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  185.   Support Yes, sounds perfect for the job.--Sampi 04:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  186.   Support Techman224Talk 01:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  187.   Support [[User:Christian Hartmann|Christian]]<sup>[[User talk:Christian Hartmann|msg]]</sup> 23:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Good candidate.[reply]
  188.   Support --Paul B 23:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  189.   Support Great background! --OrsolyaVirág 17:47, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  190.   Support -- suits the job. Huji 20:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Kwj2772 (論) 14:44, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  192.   Support --Mardetanha talk 21:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. No. Razorflame 00:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Puntori 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I have no idea who you are, and I feel like I should. Prodego talk 05:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. neen. — Albert Krantz¿? 15:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Oppose Guido den Broeder 19:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 01:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Excuse me? Since when is a SUL account obligatory? I have made thousands of edits, and am not blocked here. Guido den Broeder 15:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Restoring my vote in view of [1]. Guido den Broeder 18:18, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. NonvocalScream 20:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. No. Tesi1700 18:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Oppose I think you don't have sufficient experiences to be a steward.--Kwj2772 (論) 12:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]
    Switched--Kwj2772 (論) 14:44, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Neutral --Tauwasser 02:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2009/statements/Erwin&oldid=26366939"