Stewards/confirm/2009/Thogo

< Stewards‎ | confirm‎ | 2009
Warning The 2009 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

ThogoEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: de, en-3, es-1, fr-1, ru-1, la-1, ar-1, ne-1
  • Personal info: I try to help out where possible (and as long as my schedule allows it).
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: de, en-3, es-1, fr-1, ru-1, la-1, ar-1, ne-1
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich versuche zu helfen, wo es möglich ist (und wie es meine Zeitplanung erlaubt).
español:
  • Idiomas: de, en-3, es-1, fr-1, ru-1, la-1, ar-1, ne-1
  • Información personal: Trato de ayudar, a ser posible (y cuando mi horario me lo permite).
français:
  • Langues: de, en-3, es-1, fr-1, ru-1, la-1, ar-1, ne-1
  • Renseignements personnels: J'essaye d'aider là ou c'est possible (et pour autant que mon emploi du temps me le permette).
日本語:
  • 言語: de, en-3, es-1, fr-1, ru-1, la-1, ar-1, ne-1
  • 候補者の情報: (私のスケジュールを見て)可能な限りお手伝いしようと思います。
português:
  • Línguas: de, en-3, es-1, fr-1, ru-1, la-1, ar-1, ne-1
  • Informações pessoais: Eu tento ajudar quando é possível (e tanto quanto o meu calendário me permite).
русский:
  • Языки: de, en-3, es-1, fr-1, ru-1, la-1, ar-1, ne-1
  • Личная информация: Я пытаюсь помочь там, где это возможно (и до тех пор, пока мое расписание позволяет мне это).


Comments about ThogoEdit

  • Awesome and dedicated. miranda 00:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes, good for me. Majorly talk 00:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Oppose due to blatant abuse of their rights, which I consider entirely inappropriate. — Aitias // discussion 00:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
    Where is the "blatant abuse"? I only looked at the log, which is possible globally for all stewards anyway now. This is not a COI of any kind. --Thogo (talk) 00:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
    It's a blatant abuse per Steward_policy#Avoid_conflicts_of_interest. Changing your own rights on your home wiki is an apparent conflict of interest. — Aitias // discussion 01:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
    Maybe de-arbcom asked for Thogo to check something? That's just like Lar or anyone else CUing people on Commons or En-wiki when CUs are not available. miranda 01:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
    Exactly. Having access to a log where no local users with that user right exist cannot be a COI. And dewiki doesn't have oversighters. If I had oversighted something it would be an issue, but I didn't, as any other steward can confirm. --Thogo (talk) 01:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
    I can confirm that 1. Thogo did never do any oversight action on de.wiki and that 2. all stewards have now log access to cu and os log on all wikis. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 01:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Active in the SWMT-area, doing a great job as a steward, also helped a lot solving account-problems and in bug-finding when SULwas introduced, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Thogo is doing fine. --Kanonkas 01:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • excellent steward. --APPER 01:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Nobody is free of mistakes - but Thogo as Rights-Abuser? That makes me lough. Marcus Cyron 01:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Very active steward. Does a lot of good work. As every human makes mistakes, also a steward can. Please keep up the good work! Romaine 02:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • He has been doing a really good job and that right change on dewiki his homewiki is fine because it related to the removal or private information which I'm told he never did as it was not necessary and the fact that the german wikipedia does not have local oversighters is something the local dewikipedians should discuss about appointing :) ..--Cometstyles 03:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Thogo = good. Prodego talk 03:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Thogo == gooth (technically) which is close enough to "good" for full marks. Seriously, that rights thing is overblown. Thogo is someone I'm always glad to see on IRC, I was consulting him about something just today, and his counsel is always wise. Stewards collaborate... I can think of few stewards I'd rather collaborate with than Thogo. Hard worker. Obvious keep. ++Lar: t/c 04:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • COI - I'm also up for confirmation. Thogo was very kind and helpful when I was trying to fix my global steward account. Seems to be on IRC often doing similar things for others. I say keep. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 05:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Confirm. Good work. MBisanz talk 06:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Confirm, excellent steward --Church of emacs 10:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • good work --Berliner Schildkröte 11:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Excellent, active, helpful. What more? :)--Nick1915 - all you want 13:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. Trustworthy — vvv 14:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Always available and helpful, keep. Cbrown1023 talk 15:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep, he is active and helpful. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 16:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep, he is a good steward. -- Mercy (|) 16:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Full support - does excellent work on a consistent basis.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 17:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep 'im. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 19:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep per everyone else. Razorflame 21:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • OK--Kwj2772 03:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Well, what should I add? We know us pretty well and I can't see a reason not to trust him. A very active, hard-working and nice friend. Keep, of course. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support --Jón 17:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support Useful CU work for us on it.quote. --Nemo 18:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Keep, no reason to worry about his actions. →Na·gy 19:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Coimeád - another one of those stewards I've had to rely upon heavily over the last year. One of the good guys :) - Alison 19:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Endorse. Keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Keep Thogo, very considerate user and steward. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support --oscar 22:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Very useful fellow. DarkoNeko 00:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support.--Jusjih 03:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support ---Zyephyrus 22:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support - Peripitus 10:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Keep, very active steward. ~Innvs: 12:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support Dedicated and good! fr33kman t - c 04:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support - Woudloper 11:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support --Tilla 12:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • support Thanks for the job you're doing. Finn Rindahl 13:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support--Sadik Khalid 16:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Pro good admin german wikipedia. --Linveggie 22:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Keep We need at least one steward with a good beard. –Ejs-80 22:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Mantem, good job. Alex Pereira falaê 16:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support Kylu 21:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • well done up to now - move on the same way ;) --Rax 23:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong   Oppose Ce type, médiocre, est animé par la seule haine. --Budelberger 20:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC) ( ). (Avis donné bien qu'il soit complètement inutile ; cet individu étant un membre éminent – et éminemment représentatif – de la Famille ; maintenant, j'attends les mesures de rétorsion, de ses petits camarades, qu'il serait trop long de citer.)
    Translation: "Strong oppose: This guy, a mediocre, is driven solely by hatred. (Opinion given even though it's completely useless; this individual being an eminent member – and eminently representative – of the Family; now, I await the measures of retaliation, from his little comrades, which would be too long to cite.)" —translated by Pathoschild.
    Taking a good look at that user's talk page [1] will plenty of good reason to just ignore his comments. DarkoNeko 07:55, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support Absolutely supportive and hard worker. --RudolfSimon 22:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support Real hard worker. I'm grad to see him willing to continue. --Aphaia 05:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Keep Very active steward. --Millosh 13:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
  • definitely keep --FiliP × 17:51, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support active and exactly working steward. Thank you! --buecherwuermlein 19:18, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support Obvious keep! --M.L 23:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)