Meta:Requests for bureaucratship/Xaosflux

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Xaosflux

Xaosflux (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.

Not ending before 21 October 2021 13:18 (UTC)

Hi All, since we are down to 2 'crats, I'm throwing my hat in the ring. I'm currently an admin and oversighter here, and have been a crat on enwiki for 5 years. I expect any bureaucrat actions I would take here to be of the "very boring" variety, however that is what I personally expect of bureaucrats. I think I have a good understanding of all of our policies related to this role. Thank you for your consideration, if you have any questions for me, please let me know. --— xaosflux ^Talk 13:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See my >150 local contributions in the last 6 months — xaosflux ^Talk 14:43, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Required endorsements

Our current policy requires 2 existing bureaucrat endorsements, so pings of request to: @MF-Warburg: and @MarcoAurelio:. — xaosflux ^Talk 13:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
1. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:13, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
2. See my comment below. --MF-W 14:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Community Feedback: 24-hour window for initial objections per Meta:Bureaucrats

Same person? But well Support glad to see this, happy they finally decided to run for it. Thanks for stepping up. Although votes doesn't count here right now but will like to voice my endorsement. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
fixed! — xaosflux ^Talk 13:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course. Sgd. —Hasley 13:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, though, how much sense does it make to obtain community feedback before having the required bureaucrat endorsement? --Krd 13:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Follow up on talk. — xaosflux ^Talk 14:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just as a reminder about the process, since requests for bureaucratship are not so frequent currently: WM:B stipulates that candidates need to have 150 edits/log actions (after getting adminship and not including own userspace) in the last six months. As far as I can see, this is the case here. Two current bureaucrats' endorsements are also needed, as is known. In the past, these have not had a separate section, and I don't think they need to. Then, if no objections are raised in 24 hours after the self-nomination, the request can be closed as successful. -- That said, I endorse this request, Xaosflux is, in my opinion, capable for this role. --MF-W 14:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Absolutely --Ameisenigel (talk) 14:20, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rs chen 7754 18:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zabe (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 00:37, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -FASTILY 06:23, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support As Xaosflux is a long-term admin, I see that he/she makes actions in accordance with the policies. Also helping in RFH with comments and actions. Good luck in bureaucratship. --Uncitoyen^talk 06:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The request succeeds. No objections were raised and the request was endorsed by current crats as required. Congrats! --MF-W 13:45, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]