Meta:Requests for bureaucratship/Matiia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Matiia

Matiia (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.

Hello dear community,

as you are probably aware, we currently only have two bureaucrats. While this works, a third one would surely be beneficial as a fallback. Therefore I would like to propose Matiia. As a steward, I got to know Matiia as a very trustworthy and sensible colleague. I am sure that he will be able to fulfill the bureaucrat tasks impeccably as well. He agreed to this candidature by mail. Please take this as a bureaucrat endorsement. --MF-W 21:02, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A very sensible proposal. First Ajraddatz endorse :D – Ajraddatz (talk) 21:37, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trusted and competent user, constantly active in his steward role. It would be an excellent bureaucrat. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 21:43, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rs chen 7754 00:30, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--HakanIST (talk) 05:38, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
support of course. Stryn (talk) 06:14, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is a bit unusual since the policy requires the user to nominate himself. Therefore I have a couple of questions: 1) @Matiia: Do you accept this nomination? 2) @MF-Warburg: Can we count your nomination as an explicit bureaucrat endorsement, so the short 48 24 hours rule apply here? Thanks, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 08:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, as I have written. --MF-W 09:04, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, not enough coffee flowing through my veins apparently. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 09:11, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I accept. Matiia (talk) 09:57, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Valuable contributor who would make a good bureaucrat. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 09:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely. Trijnstel_talk 11:10, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good cross-wiki activity. –Ammarpad (talk) 17:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Eurodyne (talk) 18:45, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Defender (talk) 19:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Platonides (talk) 20:39, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Second bureaucrat endorsement. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 22:56, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Why not? Excellent candidate. --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 23:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Support. RadiX ∞ 04:05, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, everyone, for your support. Matiia (talk) 15:30, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:41, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above request page is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Comments about this page should be made in Meta:Babel or Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.