Meta:Requests for adminship/Wikitanvir

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Successful. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitanvir

Wikitanvir (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)
End date: 15:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi folks! Today I'd like to nominate Wikitanvir for adminship here on meta. He is a very active contributor here on meta and also has requested several quick deletions. I think it's time to make him an admin so he can simply delete pages himself. He is eligible for adminship here as he is admin on bnwiki, bnwiktionary and also on commons. I think he is trustworthy enough. We surely benefit from him having the admin right here. I hope you agree with me here. Good luck! -Barras 15:33, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Barras, adminship will be a great help to do the job, therefore I accept. — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 15:36, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support -Barras 15:33, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support same motive as GR, and with cookies :) Sa vh ^ñ 15:35, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I was thinking about nominating him, but Barras stole the nom. :P Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:37, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Aye Ye got é potential of bein' one :P Hydriz 15:49, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, why not - Hoo man (talk) 16:19, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Béria Lima ^msg 16:49, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course. PeterSymonds (talk) 17:57, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support fr33kman 19:41, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trijnstel 20:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support micki t 20:40, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:39, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I always see him around patrolling recents changes and requesting quick deletions. Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 02:26, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Per above, no reason why not. Ajraddatz (Talk) 03:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support certainly. Grunny (talk) 04:20, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Matanya 07:13, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support –BruTe ^talk 09:38, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --თოგო ^(D) 12:30, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -this prob. justifies a double vote. ;) Theo10011 13:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
sure --Jan eissfeldt 16:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WizardOfOz ^talk 19:45, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support —mc10 (t/c) 03:06, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clueful user. fetchcomms☛ 03:41, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alex Pereira ^falaê 10:59, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jon Harald Søby 12:07, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, trusted on Commons. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 10:45, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 11:19, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Aude 00:52, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Courcelles 19:44, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support yes--^Ομιλία Sahim 13:27, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
support —DerHexer (Talk) 15:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]