Meta:Requests for adminship/Cabayi

Cabayi edit

Cabayi (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.

Not ending before 5 September 2021 19:22 (UTC)

Hi, I mainly contribute on the English Wikipedia (where I'm a sysop), and the projects that the cross-wiki spam, sockpuppetry & vandalism I encounter lead me to, usually Commons & Wikidata. I am also a global renamer. Those, and better cross-wiki action, are my primary interests in requesting sysop. Thanks for your consideration! --Cabayi (talk) 19:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Looking at [1], the vast majority of your 590 edits (relatively low for adminship) here appear to be global rename actions, followed by SRG reports. Except for one deletion request in your deleted contributions, I can't find any local antiabuse actions, such as vandalism reverts. With this, I would say that your experience on Meta is too low to be an administrator. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:01, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Unfortunately, I don't see any your live or deleted edits to fight against the vandalism on Meta. I would like to thank you for all your edits especially on English Wikipedia, Commons and rename process. But it's too early in here. --Uncitoyen^talk 22:09, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Trust is not an issue here (GR + enwiki adminship is enough to demonstrate trust), but I don't see a need for adminship at this point. Candidate states that they often find vandalism in Commons or Wikidata, but they don't explain how would meta adminship help them with that. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 23:55, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 09:33, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request withdrawn - no point dragging this out and wasting anybody's time. Thanks for the consideration. Cabayi (talk) 09:56, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]