Meta:Requests for adminship/Aphaia temp

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Temporary sysop status granted for 30 days --.snoopy. ✉ 18:54, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aphaia

I'd like to ask for meta adminship for housekeeping translation pages, specially TR/WMF. It can be performed without the mop, but it helps greatly to reset it up (e.g. speedy, set a new page and then undelete the all past things). I could have asked for help to other admins, but it's somehow tedious and there are a lot of pages we at Transcom need to care for. Thanks, --Aphaia 10:53, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Sounds fine --.snoopy. ✉ 12:06, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely. Philippe (WMF) 12:14, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
οk –Juliancolton | ^Talk 12:37, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Of course --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. But why temp? Hadn't you permanent sysopship before already? --თოგო ^(D) 12:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Temp and Support permanent --Mardetanha ^talk 13:16, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support But... Shouldn't be this on a subpage? — Dferg (talk) 13:49, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done --.snoopy. ✉ 13:59, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks .snoopy. I've fixed my comment too to make it clearer. — Dferg (talk) 14:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks folks for your support. Why temp? I'm too inpatient for wait for a week :) And Dferg and .snoopy. thank you so much, I haven't known now all requests are expected to have their own subpage. --Aphaia 14:37, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
former admin, so trusted. Permanent, please--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 21:02, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - seems like it would be fine. Ottava Rima (talk) 21:09, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Definite support; has been quite helpful. Antandrus 21:22, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support--- @lestaty ^discuţie 22:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Sure. Tiptoety ^talk 06:11, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support for perm admin. Pmlineditor ∞ 06:59, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for permanent administratorship till block on Japanese Wikipedia is explained. Neutral for temp adminship. – Kwj2772 (msg) 10:00, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What has jawiki block to do with meta RfA?!? --WizardOfOz ^talk 10:20, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I read the requests for block page using google translation kit, he seems to be blocked due to privacy reason. So I can't sure whether I can give him/her full trust. – Kwj2772 (msg) 15:29, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support for perm admin, Oppose temp per Mardetanha.--WizardOfOz ^talk 10:19, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(+)Hillgentleman 13:50, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, np. —Innv {ru-ws} 01:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC)