Grants talk:Project/KellyDoyle/Engaging Academic Librarians and Sororities to Address the Gender Gap
Project Grant proposal submissions due today! edit
Thanks for drafting your proposal for a Project Grant. Proposals are due today! In order for this submission to be reviewed, it must be formally proposed. When you have completed filling out the infobox and have fully responded to the questions on your draft, please change status=DRAFT to status=PROPOSED to formally submit your grant proposal. This can be found in the Probox template found on your grant proposal page. If you have already done this, thanks for your submission, and you should be receiving feedback from the Project Grants committee in the coming weeks. Thanks, I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 18:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Eligibility confirmed, round 1 2017 edit
This Project Grants proposal is under review!
We've confirmed your proposal is eligible for round 1 2017 review. Please feel free to ask questions and make changes to this proposal as discussions continue during the community comments period, through 4 April 2017.
The committee's formal review for round 1 2017 begins on 5 April 2017, and grants will be announced 19 May. See the schedule for more details.
--Marti (WMF) (talk) 23:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
A question edit
Sorry, you mentioned that there will be three partner institutions involved. Who are these institutions? Or you have not selected them yet? Ruslik (talk) 18:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for your question, we listed the three partner institutions in the participants section. They are: Ohio State University, American University, and University of Pittsburgh. Please let me know if you have any other questions! KellyDoyle (talk) 14:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- One more question, what is duration of the project? Ruslik (talk) 12:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- This is a one year project, as the maximum term of the grant is for one year. Then we will evaluate next steps at that point. You can see our proposed timeline for the full year in the Project Plan section. KellyDoyle (talk) 14:49, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- One more question, what is duration of the project? Ruslik (talk) 12:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Changes edit
I have updated and added some clarifying information throughout our proposal about the work we intend to do and what we hope to create. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Thank you! KellyDoyle (talk) 14:39, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Round 1 2017 decision edit
Congratulations! Your proposal has been selected for a Project Grant.
The committee has recommended this proposal and WMF has approved funding for the full amount of your request, 52,420.00 USD
Comments regarding this decision:
The committee is glad to continue to support this partnership with West Virginia University Libraries. We appreciate the service of an experienced Wikipedian in Residence this role, and we are looking forward to your work to establish a model that may ignite Wikipedia editing in sororities across the United States.
Prior to finalizing a contract, we ask that you provide a job description specifically outlining the activities of the WiR role (we are now making this request of all WiRs).
Please note that we consider funding for WiR activities to be short-term. Grant funding that the Wikimedia Foundation provides for WiRs is not intended to support ongoing workflows in an organization, but to leverage the partnership to build a sustainable platform that ensures outcomes long after the WiR has completed their service. Your work will be to ensure that every action is taken to secure long-term outcomes that do not depend on ongoing grant funding.
Next steps:
- You will be contacted to sign a grant agreement and setup a monthly check-in schedule.
- Review the information for grantees.
- Use the new buttons on your original proposal to create your project pages.
- Start work on your project!
Upcoming changes to Wikimedia Foundation Grants
Over the last year, the Wikimedia Foundation has been undergoing a community consultation process to launch a new grants strategy. Our proposed programs are posted on Meta here: Grants Strategy Relaunch 2020-2021. If you have suggestions about how we can improve our programs in the future, you can find information about how to give feedback here: Get involved. We are also currently seeking candidates to serve on regional grants committees and we'd appreciate it if you could help us spread the word to strong candidates--you can find out more here. We will launch our new programs in July 2021. If you are interested in submitting future proposals for funding, stay tuned to learn more about our future programs.Aggregated feedback from the committee for Engaging Academic Librarians and Sororities to Address the Gender Gap edit
Scoring rubric | Score | |
(A) Impact potential
|
6.8 | |
(B) Community engagement
|
6.3 | |
(C) Ability to execute
|
6.5 | |
(D) Measures of success
|
6.5 | |
Additional comments from the Committee:
|
Unclear scope edit
It's not quite clear what this project is concretely about. What I understood is that it's certainly not the typical GLAM-focused WIR, rather some kind OER work. The educational resources will be directed to trainers rather than students («lesson plans, assignments, activities, and advocacy materials that are articulated within the framework of information literacy for easier adoption by librarians»), and the WIR may or may not have some direct involvement with some actual teaching intended to bring some users to the Wikimedia projects. Correct?
If so, will the educational resources in question developed on Wikibooks, or some other Wikimedia project? I only see mention of their being finally released on Wikimedia Commons in some static form, which is rarely useful AFAICT. --Nemo 15:56, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- This project is focused on outreach within higher education in the U.S. to students in sororities as well as librarians. The plan is to engage the students to edit articles about women / women's issues in exchange for required service credit. Meanwhile, librarians at these institutions will be engaged as well about Wikipedia editing and serving as outreach liaisons within their campus and professional communities . The events / training conducted will serve as tests and fact finding for the growth and refinement of this model at other institutions and for the created training materials. The expectation is that at the end of the grant term, events and trainings can be hosted in a self sufficient way, at any U.S. college or university through the refined training materials. The training materials will be developed for both trainers hosting events and/or looking for areas of engagement on college campuses and newcomers alike. The materials will most likely reside on Commons in a complete and finished form as the grant term will give us the time to develop and release materials that have been found the most useful throughout the year. KellyDoyle (talk) 14:14, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for reiterating this information, but it seems my questions were not clear enough because you did not address them. I'll try rephrasing.
- When you say "events / training conducted", do you plan some of them to be conducted by you directly or by others, and in either cases how will they be documented (given I can't find almost any information about the events/trainings of the previous year)?
- When you say "tests and fact finding for the growth and refinement", "refined training materials" and "time to develop and release materials that have been found the most useful throughout the year", where do you plan this work of refining and developing to happen? It would be most logical for it to be on a wiki, which is why I suggested Wikibooks. Do you plan to use a wiki? Will the work be collaborative? Will there be a chance to further develop and refine the materials after the "complete and finished form" and if so how?
- Thanks, Nemo 07:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for reiterating this information, but it seems my questions were not clear enough because you did not address them. I'll try rephrasing.