Community Wishlist Survey 2019/Editing/Cross-Platform AutoWikiBrowser

Random proposal ►◄ Editing The survey has concluded. Here are the results!

Cross-Platform AutoWikiBrowser

Problem: As a Apple mac user, I am most concerned that there is no opportunity to utilise AWB when editing
Who would benefit: Apple users who are unable to use AWB
Proposed solution: further development of T157271 to allow for cross-platform usage of AWB
More comments:
Phabricator tickets: T157271
Proposer: :JarrahTree (talk) 10:47, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

@JarrahTree: Have you tried JavaScript Wiki Browser at en:User:Joeytje50/JWB? — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 03:19, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for notification - have applied for permission to use the browser :JarrahTree (talk) 15:29, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree: You're welcome. You can use it on other wikis where you are an Admin at will. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 13:16, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting

Support (as suggestor) :JarrahTree (talk) 00:00, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:02, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:14, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Atsme^📞📧 15:40, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support web-based AWB? yes, please czar 21:31, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support JWB is nice but yes, this would be welcome. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 12:32, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support This would make me a much more effective gnome. Jonesey95 (talk) 20:00, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Viswaprabha (talk) 23:23, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would like to see AWB become web based and perhaps even have some server side actions. Wikidata integration would also be cool ;) ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 10:05, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Courcelles 15:11, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sadads (talk) 18:48, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clump (talk) 23:54, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shmurak (talk) 08:46, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Novak Watchmen (talk) 01:09, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rs chen 7754 01:54, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 13:14, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Balajijagadesh (talk) 09:49, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hmxhmx 10:57, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Also Linux distributions need own version of AWB. Gce (talk) 16:42, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Helder 13:05, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ranjithsiji (talk) 22:44, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support — AfroThundr ^{(u · t · c)} 02:07, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support YFdyh000 (talk) 17:18, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Framawiki (talk) 18:53, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Movses (talk) 14:18, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but not a web-based version, rather making AWB Mono compatible. This way the user interface wouldn’t change in any way (same .exe file on Windows, same config file, same desktop application with own window) and the codebase would require fewer changes, while it would work on Mac and Linux as well. Tacsipacsi (talk) 16:26, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]