Open main menu

Wikipedia is not a convalescent center/ko

Need help? See the Translation FAQ or Meta:Babylon. All translators should also subscribe to translators-l to be kept up-to-date (and to ask questions).

English · العربية · dansk · Deutsch · English · español · français · italiano · 한국어 · русский · српски / srpski · українська · 中文
Noto Emoji Pie 1f4c4.svg This is an essay. It expresses the opinions and ideas of some Wikimedians but may not have wide support. This is not policy on Meta, but it may be a policy or guideline on other Wikimedia projects. Feel free to update this page as needed, or use the discussion page to propose major changes.
Walnut.svg
This page in a nutshell: 위키백과 회복기의 중심이 아니다 소통의 부족을 가진 사람을위하요...
그건 그렇고, 비 전문가의 손에 재활을 맡길 것인지?

Wikipedia의 목표는 인간 문명의 모든 지식을 축적이다. 이러한 목표를 달성하기 위해, 위키백과 그들 각각의 유용 기여를 할 것이라는 희망으로 가능한 한 많은 편집자를 유치하려고합니다. 이것은 무료 백과 사전 모두에게 열려있는 이유입니다. 많은 편집자의 개입 때문에, 위키 피 디아는 또한 다른 것들 간의 커뮤니케이 션을 추구하는 사람들을 유혹하는 복잡한 사회적인 커뮤니티입니다.

위키백도 아주 습관성이다.이러한 측면에서,이 질문이 자주 발생하는: 왜 사람들은 위키 피 디아에서 작동합니까? 그들이 댓가로 무엇을합니까? 이러한 질문에 대한 대답은 간단하지 않지만 및 개인에 매우 의존하고, 일부 극단적인 경우는 호의적이 약관에 명시된 위치 : 조업과 반달 리즘 — 백과 사전 작업과 프로젝트의 사회 공동체 모두에게 파괴적인 행동의 유형.

사람들은 왜 트롤과 크래커 될 수 있습니까? 저자의 주요 목표는 다른 사람들로부터 관심을 얻을 수 있기 때문에 어떤 경우에 발생합니다. 이러한 편집기는 실제 생활에서 충분히 관심을 얻지 못할 수도 있습니다, 그 / 그녀는 사교에 위키 피 디아으로 변합니다 그래서. Perhaps, participating in an online RPG would be more appropriate, but it happens so that such person finds Wikipedia more attractive. 다시 한번 위키 피 디아는 매우 광범위한 청중들에게 인기는 것을 보여줍니다.

Definitely, yes.

  • Do we have to always assume good faith of such editor?

Definitely, no.

When someone is just trying to attract attention no matter whether he produces good or bad impression on people, he quickly realizes that in virtually any social environment the most effective and easy way to accomplish this goal is to make destructive actions rather than positive and useful ones. When it comes to the Wikipedia environment, the editor notices that nominating popular articles for deletion, participating in discussions in an uncivilized way to turn them into quarrels, and other actions of that kind, including even vandalism, easily attract as much attention if not more as good and fair work on articles and support of other people working on them. Some of those editors are smart enough to realize, however, that they also need to do some work on articles, so that they would not be considered pure disruptors by the community and thus would not be simply blocked. They usually switch between those two kinds of activity very often and quickly, and the community continues to assume good faith of them, "because they do have useful contribution".

However, such editors hinder the development of the project, drawing away other editors and wasting their time that would otherwise be spent on useful work on articles. Therefore, their contribution is as disruptive as the contribution of ordinary vandals, and may even be more harmful, because it continues for long time, whereas obvious vandals are blocked quickly.

Wikipedia is not a convalescent center for people with the lack of communication. If an editor spoils the project more than improves it, it might be considered wise and useful to restrict his work on the project to those areas where he can do positive work, and isolate him from other areas. That may include, for example, prohibition to edit pages in the Wikipedia: namespace for a particular editor, or using some kind of mentoring procedure that would narrow down the amount of people drawn away by editor's actions.

It should also be noted that the lack of communication and subnormal socialization are medical problems that require assistance from qualified health professionals. Trying to resolve these problems just by participating in an online project may not help, and may even make the situation worse, because other members of the project are usually not health professionals. Remember that 위키백과 의료 조언을 제공하지 않습니다.

If, at the rare moments when you are able to look at yourself from outside, you notice that currently the primary goal of your activity in Wikipedia is communication and attracting attention, and all other reasons are far less important or even don't turn you on anymore, you probably should:

  • 예를 들어, 통신 다른곳의 부족을 보상하려고 IRC.
  • 자격을 갖춘 의료 전문가의 도움을 받아야한다.

신경 밖으로 회전하고 결정적인 행동을하게 관리할 수 있습니다.


See also: