If it wouldn't be for the empty dates, the os wiki wouldn't have more that 204 articles making it a fifth less articles that what it has now. When i see that just like Bengali and the other bearing the no actual content I am thus putting the no actual content on that page too as I was doing the updates and nobody complained till you came this mention of content was ok. Even if you want your wikipedia to be as full as the other ones, make sure that it is not an empty one but that it has some content thus removing the comment in parenthesis. Thank you. 19:41, 27 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There are no date articles there yet, though the stubs for years 1300-2010 are really there (not all of them empty). As I calculate the number of articles manually (statistics malfunctions) I do substract several hundreds from the actual number of articles considering the newer stubs for years and similar.
Still you can't say that the whole Wikipedia has no actual content, for there are more than 200 real articles, dozens of which are really good. --Slavik IVANOV 00:14, 29 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree with you on the last info you give so you would actually put that your wikipedia has 200 articles rather that 1000 as it shows, the no actual mention shows that there are info on this page but it is rather sparsed and before people get to this page. The main page (www.wikipedia.org) doesn't show any mention about the content or anything like that and it is shown having 1000 articles. When the percentage of non-stub articles will go higher, the mention will be removed as you wish it will be. 01:42, 30 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You are absolutely not right in your crusade against the stubs in os:! Most wikipedias have stub-articles about years — say, uk: or fy: have lots of them (see uk:900, uk:901, etc.) — still nobody would change the number of their articles in the language list. The Os.wiki cannot be called guilty for early acquiring the bot use. - Slavik IVANOV 07:06, 30 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think you by mistake voted against Tamil Eelam at Translation of the week.. [1] /Johan Jönsson 11:25, 23 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please, confirm your vote in Tamil Eelam, for ordering the list.--Taichi - (あ!) 04:52, 25 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh, really! Thank you for your kind attention! - Slavik IVANOV 22:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Dankon ke vi ektradukis la proklamon de Kim Bruning kaj fintradukis la proklamon de AaronSw . Bonvolu aldoni vin al la listo de tradukistoj se vi emas plu traduki. Restas tradukendaj jenaj kandidatproklamoj - mi jam tamen tradukis la bazajn informojn : t.e. ĉion krom la proklamojn :-). Ĉu vi bonvolos fari kelkajn ? Mi jam esperantigis la ceteron de la balota materialo. Dankas Arno Lagrange  07:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nu mi nur havis iom da libera tempo kaj emon helpi vin. Mi ne povas promesi multe da konstanta helpo ĉi-rilate. - Slavik IVANOV
Mi nun fintradukis Election candidates 2006/Arnomane/Eo AL  07:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Final translation needed for creation of Sakha WikipediaEdit

Hello Amikeco. Please see Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Sakha#Final translation. Although the Sakha Wikipedia has been approved, it cannot be created until those translations are provided. —{admin} Pathoschild 07:26:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Superprotect statusEdit

Dear Amikeco, since you are an administrator on a wiki from which no user participated in this discussion, I'd like to make sure you are aware of some recent events which may alter what the Wikimedia Foundation lets you do on your wiki: Superprotect.

Peteforsyth 09:04, 12 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your account will be renamedEdit

04:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Isn't my account Amikeco?.. Amikeco (talk)
Hello Amikeco. This message was probably meant for User talk:Slavik IVANOV, which redirects to this page. Your account is fully unified and will not be renamed. —Pathoschild 23:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)