You're winningEdit

Just to let you know, your proposal #59 currently has the most votes in the Wiktionary logo vote, according to this page. Logan Talk Contributions 17:58, 30 December 2009 (UTC)


Since your proposed logo is being voted on this month, would you mind making a version of the logo with transparency? I was hoping to show voters how both candidate logos look against the MonoBook and Vector skins' gray background, but your logo is currently opaque. I would add the transparency myself, but I'm uncertain where the dictionary pages end and where the background begins. Thanks for your help. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 02:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

See User talk:mxn.
Good to hear from you, and thanks for taking the time to make an updated version of the logo. It actually looks pretty good, in my opinion. I've already caused enough controversy in helping to manage Round Two of the contest – apparently I'm a vote-rigger – so I'm not inclined to stir things up further by swapping images this late in the game. There's also an updated version of the tiles logo that isn't being displayed on that page for some reason, so you might want to request that both updates be presented to voters at the same time, for the sake of fairness.
Rest assured, pencil on paper is the only medium I'm comfortable creating art with. So adding transparency is about as much as I'm willing to touch the book logo, let alone any logo as divisive as these two. :^)
 – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 05:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)


Hi your logo is a good one, but there is some points that I haven't choose him, the book isn't well detach from the background. There is not an SVG version, I'll wanted to do one, but what is the text on the left page ? Kind regards, Otourly 11:38, 12 January 2010 (UTC)