User talk:とある白い猫/Archive/2015/08

とある白い猫 A Certain White Cat Bilinen Bir Beyaz Kedi User Page | Talk Page | Bot edits | Sandbox Kullanıcı Sayfası | Mesajlar | Bot edits | Sandbox EN JA TR Commons Hello this is an Archive. Please do not edit. You are welcome to post comments regarding material here at my user talk page. Always believe in yourserf and your dreams, you have a wing!

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2011 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2007 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2012 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2008 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2013 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2009 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2014 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2010 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2015 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12

——————————————— Archive, August 2015 ——————————————— Synchbot request Hello とある白い猫. I deleted user:Cool Cat and user:Cool Cat/* on all wikis as you requested via Synchbot; you can see the list of changes on your archive page. Note that ja:User:とある白い猫/Sidebar has a broken link to one of the deleted pages, but I can't fix it due to a local abuse filter that prevents me from editing others' pages. —Pathoschild 17:03, 02 August 2015 (UTC) Comment about Estonian Wikipedia This proposal hasn't gotten a lot of interest in et wiki. Compared to potential benefits it may require too much input to get that working reasonably well. Reason is both in the number of daily changes, that is still relatively low (people check that manually and bot edits would likely to be checked just as well), and in the fact that the vandalism is still rather rare in Estonian Wikipedia. So it seems as a minor improvement as people don't perceive the vandalism problem to be big. It is also rather challenging to do as 1) we don't have well fixed set of rules and people attend to review the articles in very different ways + if there is some vandalism, then that it is wildly different (it is easy to group it into different categories but the details of edits are so different that is can't be easy to teach a bot). The end of discussion goes to the direction that people are overly critical and some users are never satisfied with the presented text. Kruusamägi (talk) 18:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC) BTW. There are also questions on 1) could that AI tool be able to recoment articles for review based on what user likes to review; 2) could that tool help to find new (potentially) good articles. Kruusamägi (talk) 23:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC) @Kruusamägi:, hi so let me answer your questions. We intend to provide an AI frame work to deal with all sorts of backlogs wikis need assistance in. We merely started with vandalism detection and article quality assessment. :) We do not yet provide recommendations. In the future such a system could very well rely on the AI infrastructure we provide. This is something we are looking to implement in the not too distant future. The tool uses existing assessments - for example a sample of random other good articles - to learn what an Estonian good article looks like. We can provide scores which a tool can determine "good articles" as well as "featured articles" or however other assessments Estonian wiki has. System would merely recommend the community to look at the articles and wouldn't modify the wiki. So if an article has remained assessed as a stub for 5 years (because no body bothered to reassess) while the actual article was improved, our system would recommend that the stub assessment is wrong and the article should be re-assessed. It would suggest if it should be a good article, c-class or whatever but that is merely a suggestion. So the tool would take community consensus as input and base predictions on it. -- とある白い猫 chi? 21:14, 12 August 2015 (UTC) Message Ping :) --Lucas (talk) 15:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC) How can we improve Wikimedia grants to support you better? Hi! The Wikimedia Foundation would like your input on how we can reimagine Wikimedia Foundation grants to better support people and ideas in your Wikimedia project. After reading the Reimagining WMF grants idea, we ask you to complete this survey to help us improve the idea and learn more about your experience. When you complete the survey, you can enter to win one of five Wikimedia globe sweatshirts! In addition to taking the the survey, you are welcome to participate in these ways: Respond to questions on the discussion page of the idea. Join a small group conversation. Learn more about this consultation. This survey is in English, but feedback on the discussion page is welcome in any language. With thanks, I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation. (Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) (talk · contribs) through MediaWiki message delivery. 01:23, 19 August 2015 (UTC) Your request on SRGP Your request is still open, awaiting a reply from you. Otherwise, the request will likely be closed shortly. Savhñ 14:00, 29 August 2015 (UTC)