Open main menu

Training modules/dashboard/slides/11011-MEDRS-quiz/pl

This page is a translated version of the page Training modules/dashboard/slides/11011-MEDRS-quiz and the translation is 23% complete.

Other languages:
English • ‎euskara • ‎polski • ‎العربية

MEDRS quiz

Sprawdź się!
Which of the following is NOT a good source for medical statements on Wikipedia?
  1. literature reviews or systematic reviews found in reputable medical journals (kliknij aby rozwinąć lub zwinąć)
    INCORRECT. Literature reviews, and systematic reviews, are great sources for Wikipedia content, because they reflect a broad consensus of the current knowledge in the field.
  2. medical guidelines or position statements from nationally or internationally recognized expert bodies (kliknij aby rozwinąć lub zwinąć)
    INCORRECT.This is a fine source, as long as it reflects consensus in the field.
  3. a study of 1,700 patients published in a reputable medical journal (kliknij aby rozwinąć lub zwinąć)
    CORRECT! While the science may be good, this is a POOR source for medical articles on Wikipedia, because it's a primary source.
  4. academic and professional books written by experts in the relevant field, from a respected publisher (kliknij aby rozwinąć lub zwinąć)
    INCORRECT. Academic and professional texts from reliable publishers are great sources for Wikipedia articles.

(Przedyskutuj to pytanie)