Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/elections 2009/statements/Alexanderps

< Stewards | elections 2009 | statements
Warning The 2009 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Alexanderps

edit

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: pt, en-2, gl-2, es-2, fr-1, it-1
  • Personal info: My name is Alexander Pereira, I am 30 years old and live in Brasília (Brazil). I work in the financial industry. I started my involvement with Wikimedia Foundation projects on the Portuguese Wikipedia in 2006.

    I have these statuses, in these projects:

    In addition to participation in these projects, I contribute files on Commons. This is my cross-wiki contribs, more than 34,000 edits. As steward, I hope I can combat vandalism on small projects and use my experience as checkuser on two projects and bureaucrat in another two projects.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: pt, en-2, gl-2, es-2, fr-1, it-1
  • Informationen zur Person: Mein Name ist Alexander Pereira, ich bin 30 Jahre alt und lebe in Brasília (Brasilien). Ich arbeite in der Finanzbranche. In 2006 begann ich mich an Wikimedia-Foundation-Projekten in der portugiesischen Wikipedia zu beteiligen.

    In folgenden Projekten halte ich folgende Positionen inne:

    Neben meiner Beteiligung in diesen Projekten, steuere ich außerdem Dateien auf Commons bei. Meine globale Aktivität mit mehr als 34.000 Beträgen. Als Steward hoffe ich auf kleinen Projekten den Vandalismus bekämpfen zu können und meine Kenntnisse als Checkuser aus zwei Projekten und als Bürokrat aus zwei weiteren Projekten zu nutzen.
español:
  • Idiomas: pt, en-2, gl-2, es-2, fr-1, it-1
  • Información personal: Me llamo Alexander Pereira, tengo 30 años y vivo en Brasilia, Brasil. Trabajo en el sector financiero. Comencé a involucrarme en los proyectos de la fundación Wikimedia con la Wikipedia en portugués, en 2006.

    Estos son mis estados en los siguientes proyectos:

    Además de mi participación en estos proyectos, contribuyo con archivos en Commons. He aquí mis contribuciones, más de 34,000 ediciones. Como steward, deseo poder combatir el vandalismo con pequeños proyectos y usar mi experiencia como checkuser en dos proyectos y como burócrata en otros dos.
français:
  • Langues: pt, en-2, gl-2, es-2, fr-1, it-1
  • Renseignements personnels: Je m'appelle Alexander Pereira, j'ai 30 ans et j'habite à Brasília (Brésil). Je travaille dans la finance. J'ai commencé à m'impliquer dans les projets de la Wikimedia Fondation en 2006, sur la Wikipédia en portugais.

    Dans ces projets j'ai les statuts suivants :

    Outre la participation à ces projets, j'ai participé sur Commons. Voilà mes contributions, plus de 34 000 éditions. En tant que Steward, j'espère pouvoir combattre le vandalisme sur les petits projets, et mettre à profit mon expérience de checkuser (sur deux projets) et de bureaucrate (sur deux autres).
galego:
  • Idiomas: pt, en-2, gl-2, es-2, fr-1, it-1
  • Informacións persoais: Meu nome é Alexander Pereira, teño 30 anos, e moro en Brasília (Brasil). Traballo no ramo financeiro. Comecei a envolverme nos proxectos da Wikimedia Foundation pola Wikipedia en portugués, en 2006.

    Posúo os seguintes cargos, nos seguintes proxectos:

    Alén de participar destes proxectos, ainda contribuo con arquivos no Commons. Eis as miñas contribucións globais, máis de 34 mil edicións. Como steward, espero poder combater o vandalismo en proxectos menores, usar a miña experiencia como verificador en dous proxectos e como burocrata em outros dous no uso das ferramentas.
Bahasa Indonesia:
  • Bahasa yang dikuasai: pt, en-2, gl-2, es-2, fr-1, it-1
  • Informasi pribadi: Nama saya adalah Alexander Pereira, umur 30 tahun, dan tinggal di Brasília, Brazil. Saya bekerja dalam industri keuangan. Keterlibatan saya di proyek-proyek Wikimedia diawali dari Wikipedia bahasa Portugis pada tahun 2006.

    Berikut adalah proyek-proyek di mana saya terlibat:

    • Wikipedia-pt: Opsis (sejak Maret 2007) dan Checkuser (sejak April 2008), dan sebelumnya pernah menjadi Birokrat (November 2007-November 2008);
    • Wikinews-pt: Opsis (sejak Desember 2007), Birokrat (Sejak September 2008), Checkuser (sejak Oktober 2008), editor dan reviewer;
    • Wikiversity-pt: Opsis (sejak Mei 2008);
    • Meta-Wiki: Opsis (sejak Februari 2008) dan Birokrat (sejak Mei 2008);
    • OTRS: sukarelawan dengan akses ke info=pt, info-es, permissions-pt, dan permissions-es. Sebagai tambahan, saya juga menyumbangkan berkas-berkas ke Commons. Kontribusi lintas-wiki saya terdiri lebih dari 34.000 suntingan. Sebagai Steward, saya bertujuan untuk menghalau vandalisme di proyek-proyek ang masih kecil dan menggunakan pengalaman saya sebagai Checkuser dan Birokrat.
italiano:
  • Lingue: pt, en-2, gl-2, es-2, fr-1, it-1
  • Informazioni personali: Mi chiamo Alexander Pereira, ho 30 anni e vivo a Brasilia, in Brasile. Lavoro nel campo finanziario. Il mio interesse per i progetti della Wikimedia Foundation risale al 2006.

    Nei seguenti progetti, svolgo i seguenti compiti:

    Oltre alla partecipazione ai progetti qui riportati, contribuisco con file su Commons. Ecco l'elenco dei contributi sulle diverse wiki, oltre 34.000 edit. Come steward, mi auguro di contribuire a combattere il vandalismo sui progetti minori e di poter mettere al servizio la mia esperienza come checkuser su due progetti e di burocrate in altri due.
日本語:
한국어:
  • 언어 능력: 포르투갈어가 모국어, 영어-중급 수준, 갈리시아어-중급 수준, 스페인어-중급 수준, 프랑스어-초급 수준, 이탈리아어-초급 수준
  • 신상 정보: 제 이름은 Alexander Pereira이고, 나이는 30세이며, 브라질리아 (브라질)에서 살고 있습니다. 저는 금융업을 종사하고 있습니다. 제가 위키미디어 재단 프로젝트에서 활동하게된 계기는 2006년에 포르투갈어 위키백과를 접하면서 입니다.

    저는 아래에 있는 프로젝트들에서 다음과 같은 권한을 가지고 활동하고 있습니다:

    추가적으로 저는 이 프로젝트들에 참가하였고, 위키미디어 공용에서 파일을 기여하였습니다. 이 문서는 저의 전체 위키에 대한 기여 목록이고, 34,000회 이상의 편집을 하였습니다. 저는 사무장으로써 소규모의 프로젝트에서 발생한 문서 훼손 행위를 막고, 두 프로젝트에서 맡았던 체크유저와 뷰로크랫에 대한 경험을 발휘할 것입니다.
polski:
  • Języki: pt, en-2, gl-2, es-2, fr-1, it-1
  • Informacje osobiste: Nazywam się Alexander Pereira, mam 30 lat i mieszkam w stolicy Brazylii - Brasílii. Pracuję w finansach. Mój wkład w projekty Fundacji Wikimedia rozpoczął się w portugalskiej Wikipedii w 2006.

    W innych projektach mój status wygląda następująco:

    W dodatku do uczestnictwa w tych projektach dodaję pliki do Commons [1], ponad 34000 edycji. Jako steward chciałbym zwalczać wandalizmy w małych projektach i wykorzystać moje doświadczenie checkusera i biurokraty.
português:
  • Línguas: pt, en-2, gl-2, es-2, fr-1, it-1
  • Informações pessoais: Meu nome é Alexander Pereira, tenho 30 anos, e moro em Brasília (Brasil). Trabalho no ramo financeiro. Comecei a me envolver nos projetos da Wikimedia Foundation pela Wikipedia em português, em 2006.

    Possuo os seguintes cargos, nos seguintes projetos:

    Além de participar destes projetos, ainda contribuo com arquivos no Commons. Eis as minhas contribuições globais, mais de 34 mil edições. Como steward, espero poder combater o vandalismo em projetos menores, usar a minha experiência como verificador em dois projetos e como burocrata em outros dois no uso das ferramentas.
русский:
中文:
  • 可说语言: pt, en-2, gl-2, es-2, fr-1, it-1
  • 个人资料: 我名叫Alexander Pereira，今年30岁，居住在巴西。我是一名金融产业的工作者。2006年，我开始参与维基媒体基金会旗下葡萄牙语维基百科的编辑。下面列出了我在各个维基项目中拥有的权限： 除了参与上述项目外，我还为维基共享资源贡献过文件。这里列出了我所有的跨维基贡献，总量超过34,000次编辑。作为监管员，我希望能在小型项目中与破坏作斗争，充分发挥我作为两个维基项目的用户核查员以及另两个维基项目的行政员所获取的经验。
中文（简体）:
  • 可说语言: pt, en-2, gl-2, es-2, fr-1, it-1
  • 个人资料: 我名叫Alexander Pereira，今年30岁，居住在巴西。我是一名金融产业的工作者。2006年，我开始参与维基媒体基金会旗下葡萄牙语维基百科的编辑。下面列出了我在各个维基项目中拥有的权限： 除了参与上述项目外，我还为维基共享资源贡献过文件。这里列出了我所有的跨维基贡献，总量超过34,000次编辑。作为监管员，我希望能在小型项目中与破坏作斗争，充分发挥我作为两个维基项目的用户核查员以及另两个维基项目的行政员所获取的经验。
中文（繁體）:
  • 可說語言: pt, en-2, gl-2, es-2, fr-1, it-1
  • 個人資料: 我名叫Alexander Pereira，今年30歲，居住在巴西。我是一名金融產業的工作者。2006年，我開始參與維基媒體基金會旗下葡萄牙語維基百科的編輯。下面列出了我在各個維基計畫中擁有的權限： 除了參與上述計畫外，我還為維基共用資源貢獻過文檔。這裡列出了我所有的跨維基貢獻，總量超過34,000次編輯。作為監管員，我希望能在小型計畫中與破壞作鬥爭，充分發揮我作為兩個維基計畫的用戶核查員以及另兩個維基計畫的行政員所獲取的經驗。


  Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

  Yes

edit
  1.   Support —DerHexer (Talk) 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support Computer wh 15:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Support Yes. Razorflame 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Changed to neutral.[reply]
  3.   Support André Teixeira Lima 00:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support NuclearWarfare 00:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Horacewai2 00:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter. Confirmed by AccountEligibility Béria Lima Msg 11:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support I'm happy here. Majorly talk 00:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support Puntori 00:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support Luan 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support Mr.Z-man 00:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Support — vvv 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Support yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Support Epinheiro 00:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC), of course![reply]
  12.   Support --Seha 00:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Udufruduhu 00:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)not eligible to vote--Pediboi 14:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Support Cbrown1023 talk 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support Az1568 (talk) 00:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Support Chick Bowen 00:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Support Yes/Sí/はい. --Taichi - (あ！) 00:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Support Vini 175 01:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Support — neuro(talk) 01:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19.   Support --FollowTheMedia 01:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20.   Support --Ivan Štambuk 01:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21.   Support --Shizhao 01:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Yamaka122 ...:) 02:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)not eligible to vote.--Pediboi 13:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Support bibliomaniac15 03:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Support --Luisfege 03:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24.   Support--1j1z2 03:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25.   Support More workers are needed. --Millosh 03:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Support, of course. Mwaldeck msg 04:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27.   Support GlassCobra 05:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28.   Support --Sir James 05:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29.   Support Avjoska 06:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30.   Support Rubin16 08:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31.   Support Sebleouf 08:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32.   Support Octahedron80 09:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33.   Support Otourly 09:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Item 09:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC) not eligible to vote--Pediboi 13:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34.   Support RafaAzevedo 09:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35.   Support yeaaaaaaaaaaaaa --.snoopy. ✉ 09:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36.   Support --StSasha 09:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC) ДА.[reply]
  37.   Support --Wing 10:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38.   Support sounds fine --Church of emacs 10:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39.   Support Efbé   10:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Samyn97 10:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter. Confirmed by AccountEligibility Béria Lima Msg 11:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40.   Support Béria Lima Msg 10:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Complete support.[reply]
  41.   Support →Na·gy 11:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Nikolia 14:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter: Innexistent account —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 17:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please sign in to vote. →Na·gy 11:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42.   Support Vyk 11:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43.   Support The Helpful One 11:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44.   Support Stealth500
  45.   Support EUDOXIO 11:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46.   Support axpdeHello! 12:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47.   Support --Ahonc 13:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48.   Support -- Nahum 14:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49.   Support Stifle 14:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50.   Support Obelix 14:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51.   Support --Garfieldairlines 15:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52.   Support --Furado 16:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53.   Support iAlex 16:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Good luck! That Thing There 17:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC) I'm sorry, it appears you're ineligible to vote.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 17:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54.   Support SOAD KoRn 17:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55.   Support Saloca 20:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Takkyuu 21:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC) not elligible to vote--Pediboi 12:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56.   Support --buecherwuermlein 06:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Good. Rangond 07:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 19:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57.   Support No objection.--Wikipedian (Activist) 08:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58.   Support Oui --P@d@w@ne 08:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59.   Support Looks about right. --FiliP × 12:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60.   Support   Complete support. Filipe RibeiroMsg 12:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Rui kuhnert 14:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. The Helpful One 14:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61.   Support --Jón 17:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62.   Support Leefeni,de Karik 20:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - Support, Bjoertvedt need to be logged in to vote.--Pediboi 12:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63.   Support-- Bjoertvedt 17:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64.   Support   Pro. QuartierLatin1968 20:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65.   Support --Zeljko 20:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66.   Support 天使 BlackBeast Do you need something? 20:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67.   Support ~ Seb35 22:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Guille.17 Sí not enough contributions--Pediboi 12:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68.   Support everything looks good HBR 23:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69.   Support --Davecrosby uk 00:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70.   Support --Thogo (talk) 01:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --无杨 03:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC) not enough contributions--Pediboi 11:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71.   Support I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 03:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72.   Support -gildemax 09:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73.   Support --Tarantelle 10:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74.   Support--Lighterside 16:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75.   Support --Reynaldo 18:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76.   Support Fred Xavier 19:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77.   Support Knows his way around the Wikimedia Projects. Experience and knowledge is key in a situation like this. Support. Marlith T/C 19:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78.   Support Davidandrade 20:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79.   Support EBY3221 20:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80.   Support --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81.   Support sure --Nick1915 - all you want 01:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82.   Support --Hermógenes Teixeira Pinto Filho 18:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83.   Support--ZERBERUS 05:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84.   Support --Gdgourou 10:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85.   Support Oui Adailton 13:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86.   Support Changed from Neutral to Support based on answers and a closer inspection of the ptwiki issues cited by opposers and questions. John Vandenberg 16:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87.   Support Has some good cross-wiki experience and is trusted.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 18:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88.   Support Thewiikione 03:51, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89.   Support Tumnus 09:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90.   Support Xenus 14:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91.   Support --Baiji --> (Opinión) 16:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92.   Support Burmeister 22:46, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I think that you will do good job. -- A2 supersonique 22:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Unegibile voter --Nice poa 01:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93.   Support Dobau 23:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94.   Support Proofreader77 03:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Snake311 20:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. --Nick1915 - all you want 11:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95.   Support --TNolte 02:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC) (sorry for IP, my 'Unified Login' was wrong)[reply]
  96.   Support fr33kman t - c 03:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97.   Support --Daniel73480 11:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98.   Support [[User:Mateus RM|Mateus RM]] <sup>[[User talk:Mateus RM|talk]]</sup> 16:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99.   Support --Nice poa 20:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100.   Support IMatthew 20:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101.   Support Rizalninoynapoleon 12:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102.   Support Garavello 19:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103.   Support ok --Rax 22:48, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  104.   Support No problem O. Morand 00:05, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105.   Support Kleiner 14:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    yes. Gustavo Roriz 20:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Uneligible voter. Alex Pereira falaê 23:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106.   Support --João Carvalho 23:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107.   Support --Nevinho 00:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108.   Support Nbarth 02:21, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109.   Support Storkk 03:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110.   Support MOOOOOPS 04:41, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111.   Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 06:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112.   Support -- lucasbfr talk 09:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113.   Support --4wajzkd02 09:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114.   Support--Alborz Fallah 18:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  115.   Support--Thesupermat 09:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  116. --Mayer Bruno 21:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  117.   Support Raafael D 01:37, 14 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]
  118.   Support Gonçalo Veiga 22:23, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Good luck![reply]
  119.   Support Christian Hartmann 15:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]
  120.   Support Talk2lurch 21:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Go on![reply]
  121.   Support Some people say you are already busy with other tasks and conclude that you shouldn't become a Steward. I disagree with them: first, it is you who knows if you can work more or not; second, you are allowed to become a steward, and if it happens, to resign from some other tasks (and you are also allowed to postpone such resignation until you become a steward). Besides, it is great to have a steward from your time zone and with your language skills. Huji 12:32, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  122.   Support --Fabexplosive The archive man 07:46, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  123.   Support André Koehne 19:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  124.   Support --Mardetanha talk 21:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  125.   Support --Meno25 23:45, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1.   Oppose — Aitias // discussion 00:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Oppose Pediboi 01:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Improper behavior as pt.wikipedia CheckUser as explained here[reply]
    Explained in answer to your question. Alex Pereira falaê 14:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Oppose Sorry but No. Jobcolector. How much more? SysOP, Crat, CU - 9 different jobs until here. This is enough. Marcus Cyron 01:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. ptwiki issues. Prodego talk 05:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Caspiax --Caspiax --Caspiax 10:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter: This user don't have an account on Meta with userpage linked to his homewiki —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 17:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Oppose I agree with Marcus Cyron. Jobcolector. - Al Lemos 11:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Oppose Me, too, NoychoH 13:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Oppose --MF-W 14:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Oppose I agree with Marcus Cyron. Enbéká 15:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Oppose No. --RoswithaC 19:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Oppose NonvocalScream 20:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Oppose Njaelkies Lea 21:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC) The Portuguese issues worry me.[reply]
  12.   Oppose No. --Nrainer 23:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Oppose — MrDolomite • Talk 15:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Oppose No. --Andrsvoss 15:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Oppose No. Agree with Marcus Cyron, too many titles to do. Vinhtantran 03:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Oppose Hargau 05:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Oppose Stef48 08:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Oppose Maedin\talk 13:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Avi 14:27, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Moved to neutral upon receipt of satisfactory explanation -- Avi 17:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Avi, because the summary used by any verification, it's possible to compare user with IPs by logs. Many checkusers have a archive (I have, actual checkusers have, former have) of their verifications, because the tool have a limited time of verification. So, when we have a CU, if applicable, we compare with our archive (obvius, nobody discloses that). I hope have answered your question. Alex Pereira falaê 16:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I will take this to e-mail to preserve the privacy of anyone who may be involved. -- Avi 16:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19.   Oppose Evidence of canvassing, borderline misuse of checkuser tools per the questions above. AndrewRT 22:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20.   Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 02:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21.   Oppose I am concerned about the answer to Q6. Kingturtle 17:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Oppose Ozymandias 09:04, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Meekohi 22:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible to vote. --Lucas Nunes 01:24, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Oppose DorisAntony 21:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Oppose Too much access--132.205.110.197 20:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC) IP don't vote. --Lucas Nunes 20:46, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24.   OpposeMizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 15:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC) - Too much "jobs". Take it easy![reply]
  25.   Oppose--Drboisclair 22:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Oppose per Marcus Cyron --Wikikids 02:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Oppose per --User: Valid 02:19, 12 February 2009 sorry, you must to be logged to vote. --Nice poa 08:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27.   Oppose per Marcus Cyron. I think it's almost impossible to hold all of these positions! --OrsolyaVirág 18:26, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28.   Oppose per Marcus Cyron. Khoikhoi 23:41, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1.   Neutral perhaps all OK, but someone mentioned ptwiki issues and I think you have enough roles ... --Smihael 11:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Waiting on answers to questions related to ptwiki. John Vandenberg 14:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Comment - What happneed in pt.wiki? In end of 2008 one of the CheckUsers resign, and only Alex and other user done the CheckUsers, in the same time, pt.wiki have a lot of sock puppets and dispurtives accounts in this time (PédiBoi is one of them), and we have a time whit 5, 6 CheckUsers at the same time. It's complete normal that Alex, whit so lot of work, have put in analissis the wrong CheckUser (He apologise after that). Béria Lima Msg 12:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Neutral Waiting for answers on questions 4-8, will vote opposed if questions are not answered by the last day. Leujohn 09:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Neutral Punx 09:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Neutral I am satisfied with the explanation. Thank you, Alex, and good luck. -- Avi 16:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Neutral ...Aurora... 11:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Neutral Not sure how to vote on this one. Both sides have good arguments. Razorflame 04:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Neutral --Sampi 20:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Neutral Too pt centric Carsrac 23:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2009/statements/Alexanderps&oldid=26366936"