Requests for comment/What is the benefit of bureaucrat permission?

The following request for comments is closed. Out of scope for RFC and also inactive.

Hello.What is the benefit of bureaucrat permission?!Why Not only "administrators"?! --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think that this fails the scope of RFC. You could ask such things elsewhere, no need to start a request for comment. And to your question; you can read what 'crats do at Bureaucrat. They have some rights that admins don't have.´--Stryn (talk) 10:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Stryn: I know this.But I think that the best is giving bureaucrat permissions to admins and abolish bureaucrat right --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:41, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Then for example on the Finnish Wikipedia admins could give admin rights to everyone and they could also remove admin rights and remove users from the Arbitration Committee. Sounds like a not good idea. --Stryn (talk) 11:26, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Stryn: Did you mean it's more dangerous right? --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, all of the Icelandic Wikipedia sysops are also bureaucrats. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:31, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what this RFC is intended to solve. If you have something more specific to say, then say it... --Rschen7754 07:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]