Movement Strategy/Recommendations/Iteration 3/Evaluate, Iterate, and Adapt/pt
|
This is an archive for draft recommendations. Visit Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations to read the final recommendations. |
Conexão com outras recomendações
|
|---|
|
This recommendation proposes the idea of underpinning our Movement with continuous processes to analyze our ecosystems, raise awareness on their current state, and plan for our continued growth. It is foundational to all other recommendations, as, without analysis of where we are and how we do things, we cannot adjust and make changes to guarantee our future growth and sustainability. |
Devemos avaliar todas as áreas, inclusive cobertura de conteúdo, comunidade e diversidade e inclusão de governança[1], desenvolvimento de habilidades, impacto da parceria, eficiência tecnológica e usabilidade e acessibilidade das plataformas. Os resultados devem ser comunicados de forma ampla e clara ao longo do movimento, para aumentar a autoconsciência e responsabilidade entre todas as partes interessadas, permitindo-nos adaptar nossas estratégias de acordo.
Por que?
|
|---|
|
As we are planning to create or reorientate new structures and processes to reach our 2030 goals, we must develop comprehensive methods to evaluate whether the path we are taking is leading us in the right direction. Today, the Wikimedia Movement insufficiently evaluates its contents, programs, and processes, making it difficult to identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, preventing stakeholders from advancing towards both efficiency and impact. To date, efforts to map and build capacity for Movement stakeholders have been ad hoc and un-sustained. The strategic direction requires new thinking, skills, and structures to build evidence-based best practices to document, sustain, and evaluate the progress or failures of programs, including for capacity building and skill development programs, over the long term.[2] |
Como?
|
|---|
|
To overcome the current barriers to growth, we recommend an approach based on several actions. We must develop methodologies to account for meaningful learning and sharing of experiences across our Movement. These methodologies involve planning, evaluation, dissemination of results, and iterations of processes to improve our Movement direction. Programmatic and project planning will include systematic evaluation as an integral part of the process, as preconditions to adapting to changing environments, and to the improvement of our overall work. Evaluation needs to be incorporated into decision-making at all institutional levels. Planning for adequate resources, skills development, and capacity needs will be necessary to create meaningful evaluation processes. The evaluation processes should occur at and across all levels, to verify whether our work is making progress toward achieving our strategic goals. Evaluation processes should also be adapted to the capabilities of the different communities (i.e. not be time-consuming, easy to put in place, supported by resources). This process ends with the dissemination of knowledge. Any evaluation, iteration, and change must be stored in the knowledge management system, accessible and communicated to the entire Movement, in order to raise awareness, amplify its effects, and help others avoid duplication of efforts. The results from the evaluation must be disseminated and discussed with all involved stakeholders. For example, verifying that an improvement in the registering process / user page creation has increased user retention in a particular language edition must be communicated to the corresponding language community. The results from the evaluation must provide the necessary data to understand the context and elements involved in the system or part of the system examined[3]. Including the people who may benefit from the change that is evaluated, whether it is the current community, new participants, or other groups of users, allows what was learned to be better understood with potentially greater impact within other projects who can learn from and adapt the results[4]. Every evaluation must be adapted to achieve its intended goals. |
Avaliação:[5]
- Estabelecer critérios de avaliação claros, com base nas nossas metas: impacto, experiência de usuário inclusiva, centralidade nas pessoas e equidade, para facilitar o planejamento e a tomada de decisão em todos os níveis para o nosso crescimento e sustentabilidade. [6]
- Estabelecer mecanismos para esclarecer as responsabilidades mútuas de quaisquer partes interessadas dentro do Movimento Wikimedia. [7]
Iteração:
- Monitorar o progresso com a implementação de equidade no Movimento, avaliando a diversidade [4] e a inclusão [8] do recém-chegado como fundamentos da participação no Movimento.
- Avaliar mudanças estratégicas, para garantir que as comunidades atuais e a diversidade futura de perfis sejam sempre levadas em consideração, à medida que implementamos recomendações estratégicas. [9]
- Fornecer avaliação com recursos e especialistas em qualquer área específica. [10]
- Desenvolver um sistema de avaliação abrangente para o desenvolvimento de capacidade, para permitir que as partes interessadas entendam e valorizem seu progresso e sintam-se apoiadas em sua inclusão. [10]
- Iterar processos que proponham mudanças nas áreas de tecnologia, políticas e sistemas de governança, para promover a validação por meio de pesquisa e testes. [4]
Adaptabilidade:
- Adotar políticas e procedimentos com base nas avaliações do mundo em mudança e no movimento em mudança, para enfrentar situações e desafios novos e alterados.
- Aumentar a flexibilidade e a adaptabilidade das estruturas e abordagens que desenvolvemos. [11]
- Planejar, orçar e investir em pesquisa para fazer ajustes conforme o necessário para melhorias, inovações e impacto. [4]