الاستراتيجية/حركة ويكيميديا/2018-20/التوصيات/التقييم والمراجعة والتعديل

This page is a translated version of the page Movement Strategy/Recommendations/Iteration 3/Evaluate, Iterate, and Adapt and the translation is 59% complete.

This is an archive for draft recommendations.

Visit Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations to read the final recommendations.

التالي←

→السابق

التقييم والمراجعة والتعديل

الارتباط بالتوصيات الأخرى

الارتباط بالتوصيات الأخرى
This recommendation proposes the idea of underpinning our Movement with continuous processes to analyze our ecosystems, raise awareness on their current state, and plan for our continued growth. It is foundational to all other recommendations, as, without analysis of where we are and how we do things, we cannot adjust and make changes to guarantee our future growth and sustainability.

ماذا؟

من أجل "أن تصبح حركتنا هي البنية التحتية الأساسية لمنظومة المعرفة الحرة"، نحتاج، كحركة، إلى تقييم التقدم الذي نحرزه باستمرار نحو تحقيق أهدافنا الداخلية والخارجية حتى نتمكن من مراجعة عملياتنا وهياكلنا الاجتماعية - الفنية وتكييفها وترقيتها. سيتيح لنا ذلك أن نبقى مرنين في السياقات الديناميكية ولضمان أن تكون برامجنا وإجراءاتنا جيدة التوجيه وفعالة.

يجب علينا تقييم جميع المجالات، بما في ذلك تغطية المحتوى، وتنوع واندماج المجتمع والحوكمة^[1]، وتنمية المهارات، وتأثير الشراكات، وكفاءة التقنية، وسهولة استخدام المنصات وإمكانية الوصول إليها. يجب الإبلاغ بالنتائج على نطاق واسع وبشكلٍ واضح عبر الحركة لزيادة الوعي الذاتي والمساءلة بين جميع أصحاب المصلحة، مما يتيح لنا تكييف استراتيجياتنا وفقًا لذلك.

لماذا؟

As we are planning to create or reorientate new structures and processes to reach our 2030 goals, we must develop comprehensive methods to evaluate whether the path we are taking is leading us in the right direction. Today, the Wikimedia Movement insufficiently evaluates its contents, programs, and processes, making it difficult to identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, preventing stakeholders from advancing towards both efficiency and impact.

To date, efforts to map and build capacity for Movement stakeholders have been ad hoc and un-sustained. The strategic direction requires new thinking, skills, and structures to build evidence-based best practices to document, sustain, and evaluate the progress or failures of programs, including for capacity building and skill development programs, over the long term.^[2]

كيف؟

To overcome the current barriers to growth, we recommend an approach based on several actions. We must develop methodologies to account for meaningful learning and sharing of experiences across our Movement. These methodologies involve planning, evaluation, dissemination of results, and iterations of processes to improve our Movement direction.

Programmatic and project planning will include systematic evaluation as an integral part of the process, as preconditions to adapting to changing environments, and to the improvement of our overall work. Evaluation needs to be incorporated into decision-making at all institutional levels. Planning for adequate resources, skills development, and capacity needs will be necessary to create meaningful evaluation processes.

The evaluation processes should occur at and across all levels, to verify whether our work is making progress toward achieving our strategic goals. Evaluation processes should also be adapted to the capabilities of the different communities (i.e. not be time-consuming, easy to put in place, supported by resources). This process ends with the dissemination of knowledge. Any evaluation, iteration, and change must be stored in the knowledge management system, accessible and communicated to the entire Movement, in order to raise awareness, amplify its effects, and help others avoid duplication of efforts.

The results from the evaluation must be disseminated and discussed with all involved stakeholders. For example, verifying that an improvement in the registering process / user page creation has increased user retention in a particular language edition must be communicated to the corresponding language community. The results from the evaluation must provide the necessary data to understand the context and elements involved in the system or part of the system examined^[3]. Including the people who may benefit from the change that is evaluated, whether it is the current community, new participants, or other groups of users, allows what was learned to be better understood with potentially greater impact within other projects who can learn from and adapt the results^[4]. Every evaluation must be adapted to achieve its intended goals.

النتائج المتوقعة

التقييم:^[5]

وضع معايير واضحة للتقييم استنادًا إلى أهدافنا: التأثير، وتجربة استخدام شاملة للجميع، والتركيز على الأشخاص، والإنصاف لتسهيل التخطيط وصنع القرارات على جميع المستويات لتحقيق النمو والاستدامة^[6].
وضع آليات توضح المسؤوليات المتبادلة لكل المساهمين في داخل حركة ويكيميديا^[7].

المراجعة:

مراقبة التقدم المحرز في تحقيق الإنصاف في الحركة من خلال تقييم التنوع^[4] ودمج الوافدين الجدد^[8] كنقاط أساسية للمشاركة في الحركة.
تقييم التغييرات الاستراتيجية للتأكد من أن كل من المجتمعات الحالية والتنوع المستقبلي للمساهمين مأخوذون دائمًا بعين الاعتبار أثناء تنفيذ التوصيات الاستراتيجية^[9].
.توفير الموارد والخبراء للمساعدة في عمليات التقييم في أي مجال معين^[10]
وضع نظام تقييم شامل لبناء القدرات من أجل السماح لجميع الأطراف بفهم ولمس تقدمهم والإحساس بكونهم مدعومين للاندماج بيننا^[10].
إعادة العمليات التي تقترح تغييرات التقنية وفي السياسات وأنظمة الحوكمة لتعزيز التأكيد من خلال البحث والاختبار^[4].

قابلية التكيف:

تبني سياسات وإجراءات تستند على تغيرات العالم وحركتنا لمواجهة المواقف والتحديات الجديدة والمتغيرة.
زيادة المرونة والقدرة على التكيف في الهياكل والمناهج التي نطورها^[11].
التخطيط ووضع ميزانيات والاستثمار في الأبحاث لإجراء التعديلات والتحسينات المطلوبة والابتكار والتأثير^[4].

المراجع

↑ Capacity Building R6: Evaluating Capacity Building
↑ Tanzania Strategy Salon, June 2019, Resource allocation thematic area, Catalan Strategy Salon, September 2019, Product and technology thematic area
↑ Egypt/Spain Strategy Salon community conversations, June 2019, Capacity Building thematic area
↑ ^a ^b ^c ^d Diversity R2: Reaching a self-aware and dynamic structure
↑ Community Survey Analysis: Resource Allocation: “numerous responses about accountability”.
↑ Partnerships R1: Provide the knowledge needed for understanding and solving global issues, Community Survey Analysis: Product & Technology, Q2, “gentle introduction of changes”, Diversity R2: Reaching a self-aware and dynamic structure, Roles & Responsibilities R1: All of this exists to support our primary purpose
↑ Roles & Responsibilities R6: Wikimedia Movement organisations
↑ Community Health R6: Newcomers are a key indicator to the success of the Movement
↑ Community Survey Analysis: Product & Technology, Q2, “gentle introduction of changes”, Diversity R2: Reaching a self-aware and dynamic structure
↑ ^a ^b Capacity Building R6: Evaluating Capacity Building
↑ Resource Allocation RF: Ensure flexible approach to resource allocation, Advocacy R2: Diversity

[1] Capacity Building R6: Evaluating Capacity Building

[2] Tanzania Strategy Salon, June 2019, Resource allocation thematic area, Catalan Strategy Salon, September 2019, Product and technology thematic area

[3] Egypt/Spain Strategy Salon community conversations, June 2019, Capacity Building thematic area

[d2-4] Diversity R2: Reaching a self-aware and dynamic structure

[5] Community Survey Analysis: Resource Allocation: “numerous responses about accountability”.

[6] Partnerships R1: Provide the knowledge needed for understanding and solving global issues, Community Survey Analysis: Product & Technology, Q2, “gentle introduction of changes”, Diversity R2: Reaching a self-aware and dynamic structure, Roles & Responsibilities R1: All of this exists to support our primary purpose

[7] Roles & Responsibilities R6: Wikimedia Movement organisations

[8] Community Health R6: Newcomers are a key indicator to the success of the Movement

[9] Community Survey Analysis: Product & Technology, Q2, “gentle introduction of changes”, Diversity R2: Reaching a self-aware and dynamic structure

[cb6-10] Capacity Building R6: Evaluating Capacity Building

[11] Resource Allocation RF: Ensure flexible approach to resource allocation, Advocacy R2: Diversity

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]