Meta:Requests for checkuser/Lar

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Lar

The rationale for this nomination is that the rules for Check User rights require there to be two on any Wiki. As I understand it there are no other elected CU's on Meta so Larry would make the 2nd to Pathoschild. In my experience recently there appear to be no other active elected CUs & I fully agree with Aphaia that rules should be respected here as well as on other Wikis.

Larry is a user I have considerable respect for. I have worked with him across projects in a number of ways. He is approachable and responsive. His crosswiki experience is extensive and indicates a committed wikimedian. I nominated him for these rights on Commons and was very pleased that the community there supported him. He has made good use of the rights there & is familiar with the issues involved. I have made a number of nomination on wikis - the one for Larry on Commons I have no regrets about at all and I am sure he would serve here in a valuable way. For those of you not familiar with his work please look here --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:02, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Herby, for your support (it should be noted that Herby and I have worked closely together on a few crosswiki cases he's brought to my attention, and I intend to nom him for CU on Commons fairly soon... if no one beats me to it), and I accept. I think having CUs with access to more than one project is a good thing, as it makes it easier to deal with cross project issues. ++Lar: t/c 14:33, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support. --Afinogenoff 10:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabexplosive 11:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think Lar is a good choice, especially with his experience as a Commons checkuser. Majorly (talk) 11:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thogo (talk) 13:58, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support can't not support really! --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --.anaconda 14:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good choice. --Aphaia
Support, will make a good CU. --Guinnog 15:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support obviously Yonatanh 16:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I fully trust Lar and we need more CUs on meta since the current CUs are not much active. Though I stronly disagree with the rationale: we have current checkusers on meta, we don't *need* to have another one *only because* we elect Pathoschild. guillom 16:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I fully trust Lar, as I trust Pathoschild, and his experience with these tools and other tools on various projects including here, Commons, and Wikipedia, make me sure that he will be a very good meta CU. :) Cbrown1023 talk 16:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Az1568 16:34, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Larsupport--Shanel 16:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --birdy geimfyglið _{(:> )=|} 17:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A. B. ^(talk) 19:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --M/ 20:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, trustworthy, definitely would not misuse CU. --Coredesat (en.wp) 20:23, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support ElinorD 23:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 23:25, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, obviously. Joe 04:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Steel ^en:Steel 11:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mr Lar. No hesitations or concerns about this request. Absolute support. Sarah Ewart 12:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I trust Larry. JzG 13:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Marbot 19:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support xaosflux ^Talk 01:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. WjBscribe 02:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Completely trustworthy fellow who I'm confident will do an excellent job with his added role helping Wikimedia Gaillimh 04:48, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support absolutely. - Tangotango 12:48, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done Jon Harald Søby 18:21, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]