Meta:Requests for bureaucratship/.anaconda

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

.anaconda edit

As Majorly said above, the RFH page has some rename requests and no bureaucrat seems to be really active. I was thinking on proposing myself a few hours ago, I just came here and noticed Majorly's candidacy - considering that MaxSem requested bureaucrat access because "requests to bureaucrats are delayed sometimes" just 3 months ago, I think that Meta needs more bureaucrats. I noticed sometimes requests for Meta are put in the RFP page, but bureaucrats don't notice them. I'm actively following the RFH page and this page. For these reasons I propose myself as Meta bureaucrat. --.anaconda 02:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support .anaconda is one of the most active admins here, we need more 'crats, and I trust him with the tools. Cbrown1023 talk 02:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support Definitely - one of the most hardworking admins here, so that would reflect well as a bureaucrat. Good luck! Majorly (talk) 02:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support ... I agree that we do need more crats. ++Lar: t/c 02:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support ... thanks for serving. --A. B. ^(talk) 03:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aphaia 04:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support No question at all --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 09:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brownout^(msg) 14:43, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Massimiliano L. 14:45, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --valepert 16:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --M/ 16:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
For Cary Bass ^demandez 17:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I watch him work on the RC list, good job. --Whiteknight (meta) (Books) 17:56, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --birdy geimfyglið _{(:> )=|} 19:56, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thogo (talk) 20:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC) Thank you for volunteering.[reply]
Support sorry....it's too late? :P --dario vet (talk) 20:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well, he can't be more dangerous as buro instead of only sysop :P Filnik 20:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support as Cbrown. Joe 05:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Confident user can be trusted. Adambro 17:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support++ --Paginazero - Ø 20:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
support Helios 20:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. xaosflux ^Talk 04:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Greeves ^{(talk • contribs • Wikipedia)} 18:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would make a good bureaucrat. Besides, we need more of them. Sr 13 18:37, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Roosa _(Talk) 16:10, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, of course! Snowolf 19:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alfreddo 19:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Skyluke 19:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Marbot 20:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bravoooooo --Tooby 23:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jaqen 23:32, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--ChemicalBit 23:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Andre (talk) 23:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gianfranco 05:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Leoman3000 14:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabexplosive The archive man 14:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wim b 14:57, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
support Ooswesthoesbes 15:05, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could use another 'crat on meta. Nom is an active, experienced, and trusted admin here. Is a good choice for this position. FloNight 17:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vote closed, bureaucrat flag granted: --M/ 17:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]