Meta:Requests for adminship/Wpedzich 2

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Wojciech Pędzich

About 2 years ago I gave up my position as a Wikimedia steward and as a Meta administrator (shortly-held to be more precise). I consider I will be visiting Meta more often, so if I can help with e.g. removing out-of-scope pages, which I now mark with the speedy deletion template, I can take some of the weight off the active admin body. Also, on occasions such as fundraising, I will almost certainly need to edit protected templates, which was the basic ground for my first adminship request on Meta. I will appreciate the granting of the sysop privileges here.

Kind regards, Wojciech Pędzich Talk 08:28, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Trusted, would do well. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 08:30, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Pmlineditor. –BruTe ^talk 08:53, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support No problem --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:00, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mercy 09:02, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --თოგო ^(D) 10:29, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support A fine editor. ⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 10:41, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Airwolf 11:38, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, LeinaD (t) 13:54, 19 January 2011 (UTC) nawet ja tu nie mam admina ;-P[reply]
- Da się temu zaradzić, pisz wniosek. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 13:55, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
SupportMardetanha ^talk 15:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Per above. Ajraddatz (Talk) 16:18, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Avi 17:44, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course. Welcome back & thanks for helping! -- Dferg ^{☎ talk} 18:05, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WizardOfOz ^talk 18:30, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - trusted and would be helpful as an admin. Aude 22:12, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mikołka (talk) 00:30, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Hoo man (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Maximillion Pegasus 15:30, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wutsje 17:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Sokac121 17:16, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awersowy 18:06, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Picus viridis 22:24, 20 January 2011 (UTC) He's proved to be a clever boy ;-)[reply]
Support Grunny (talk) 01:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cekli829 06:35, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. PeterSymonds 17:52, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support – no way I could vote aganist... Abronikowski 21:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cbrown1023 talk 22:17, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:36, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support absolutely--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 19:38, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jan eissfeldt 06:26, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --M/ 20:35, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - without question. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 02:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'Successful' -Barras 08:13, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]