Meta:Requests for adminship/Wiki13

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Wiki13 edit

Wiki13 (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

Ending 7 January 2016 22:29 UTC

Hello everyone, hereby I would like to request local adminship op Meta-Wiki. Lately I've come across several cases, where a LTA is on a vandalism spree on Meta. When that happens, I can't do a whole lot other than reverting and/or tagging pages (or requesting for a deletion to a current admin on Meta, which I have been doing a lot lately (mostly via IRC) for deletion. I feel I can do this work more efficiently, if I were an admin here.

For people that don't know me yet: I'm Wiki13 and currently a global sysop and global rollbacker. Also I'm an administrator on the Dutch Wikipedia. I have also been active as administrator on Wikidata for its first year of existence, to get it to the point of where it could stand on its own feet. Concluding: I already have quite some experience with the admin tools and how they work and I think I would be an addition to the current team. If you have any questions about me or some action I did, feel free to ask below. Wiki13 _talk 22:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Highly trusted user. --Ochilov (talk) 22:32, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support seems alright. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Base (talk) 00:42, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support eurodyne (talk) 00:51, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose As with several requests here on meta before, countervandalism activities per se are not a sufficient rationale for meta adminship, there is a reason why metawiki is not included in the GS wiki set. Feel welcome to participate here on this wiki (currently 0 edits to meta namespace besides cvn, votes and translations) and I may reconsider my decision to oppose here. Kind regards, --Vogone (talk) 02:47, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I stated in my rationale above I would mostly do just regular cleanup, but that does not neccesarly mean I won't do other things like trying to help with the spam blacklist or requests on Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat. --Wiki13 _talk 10:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Vogone for now I think. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:24, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose What Vogone said. I'd like to see more participation in Meta activity. --Glaisher (talk) 10:27, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:27, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request withdrawn. I'm not going to continue this request for another six days. Apparently I'm not active enough on Meta-Wiki to fill in this request. Next time I will think twice to even consider this. --Wiki13 _talk 15:53, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]